RESUMEN
Healthcare systems must embody equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) and, in the event of unfairness, appropriate policies / countermeasures should be enacted. The healthcare system response to the COVID-19 pandemic not only highlighted how socioeconomic disparities affect mortality risk but also posed significant challenges to the successful practice of EDI in healthcare. In light of this, this article was written to provide an overview of EDI, analyze the international efforts to promote it, and suggest strategies for promoting EDI in infectious disease healthcare using COVID-19 as an example. In healthcare settings, equity centers on ensuring patients receive fair treatment regardless of race, gender, age, or socioeconomic status; diversity centers on healthcare providers understanding the uniqueness of patients from different cultural backgrounds and the health barriers they face; and inclusion centers on ensuring patients are treated with respect and given the attention they deserve. During pandemics, social determinants of health (SDOH) greatly impact patient health outcomes and hinder the practice of EDI. Reflecting on the impact of COVID-19, healthcare systems can actively apply EDI in clinical practice to provide to all patients equitable access to healthcare opportunities and outcomes. Practical strategies include establishing EDI committees within healthcare systems, monitoring relevant data, conducting staff training, and continuously addressing the SDOH and needs of marginalized groups to achieve EDI in healthcare.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diversidad Cultural , Equidad en Salud , Pandemias , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Diversidad, Equidad e InclusiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure (OOPHE) without adequate social protection often translates to inequitable financial burden and utilization of services. Recent publications highlighted Cambodia's progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) with reduced incidence of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and improvements in its distribution. However, departing from standard CHE measurement methods suggests a different storyline on trends and inequality in the country. OBJECTIVE: This study revisits the distribution and impact of OOPHE and its financial burden from 2009-19, employing alternative socio-economic and economic shock metrics. It also identifies determinants of the financial burden and evaluates inequality-contributing and -mitigating factors from 2014-19, including coping mechanisms, free healthcare, and OOPHE financing sources. METHODS: Data from the Cambodian Socio-Economic Surveys of 2009, 2014, and 2019 were utilized. An alternative measure to CHE is proposed: Excessive financial burden (EFB). A household was considered under EFB when its OOPHE surpassed 10% or 25% of total consumption, excluding healthcare costs. A polychoric wealth index was used to rank households and measure EFB inequality using the Erreygers Concentration Index. Inequality shifts from 2014-19 were decomposed using the Recentered Influence Function regression followed by the Oaxaca-Blinder method. Determinants of financial burden levels were assessed through zero-inflated ordered logit regression. RESULTS: Between 2009-19, EFB incidence increased from 10.95% to 17.92% at the 10% threshold, and from 4.41% to 7.29% at the 25% threshold. EFB was systematically concentrated among the poorest households, with inequality sharply rising over time, and nearly a quarter of the poorest households facing EFB at the 10% threshold. The main determinants of financial burden were geographic location, household size, age and education of household head, social health protection coverage, disease prevalence, hospitalization, and coping strategies. Urbanization, biased disease burdens, and preventive care were key in explaining the evolution of inequality. CONCLUSION: More efforts are needed to expand social protection, but monitoring those through standard measures such as CHE has masked inequality and the burden of the poor. The financial burden across the population has risen and become more unequal over the past decade despite expansion and improvements in social health protection schemes. Health Equity funds have, to some extent, mitigated inequality over time. However, their slow expansion and the reduced reliance on coping strategies to finance OOPHE could not outbalance inequality.
Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Cambodia/epidemiología , Humanos , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Financiación Personal/tendencias , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/economía , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Masculino , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: National health systems have different strengths and resilience levels. During the COVID-19 pandemic, resources often had to be reallocated and this impacted the availability of healthcare services in many countries. To date there have been few quantitative contemporary studies of inequalities in access to healthcare within and between countries. In this study, we aim to compare inequality within and between 16 economically diverse countries. METHODS: Online surveys were conducted on 22 150 adults in 16 countries across six continents in 2022. Quota sampling and post-stratification weighting was used to obtain an age, gender, geographically, and educationally representative sample. The study assesses the differences in challenges in access to healthcare during the pandemic (for GP, surgical/clinical and digital GP services) using country-specific expanded health-needs-adjusted Erreygers' concentration indices and compares these values between countries using a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Results show wide variation in income-related challenges in access within countries for different types of care. For example, Erreygers' concentration index for digital services in Colombia exhibited highly regressive inequality at 0·17, compared to Japan with an index of -0·15. Inequalities between countries were also evident, with Spearman rank coefficients of -0·69 and -0·65 (p-values of 0·003 and 0·006) for digital and surgical access, indicating that lower income countries had greater inequality in healthcare access challenges. CONCLUSION: During the pandemic, inequalities in challenges to accessing healthcare were greatest in low and middle-income countries. Digital technologies offer a reasonable means to address some of this inequality if adequate support is provided and accessible digital infrastructure exists.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven , Pandemias , Anciano , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People with end-of-life chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience debilitating physical limitations, with a high mortality rate. Our research has shown health system design and delivery leads to inequitable outcomes. Enabling people with end-of-life COPD, their support people, and health professionals to partner in setting the agenda for resource allocation may inform health service improvement. DESIGN: Qualitative methodology utilising focus groups including patients, family, friends, informal support people, health care workers and professionals. METHODS: The analysis, utilising critical theory and Actor-Network theory, positioned people with severe COPD, their support people and health professionals as experts in end-of-life care. Analyses triangulated these perspectives, and were reviewed by the research investigators and an expert reference group. RESULTS: Participants (n=74) in seven focus groups reported their experiences of inequity within the healthcare system. Equity was an overarching phenomenon identified by participants, with three specific themes being described: policy design, system design, and service design. CONCLUSION: Experiences of patients, their support people and health professionals as experts in end-of-life COPD care can inform health systems and health service design to address current inequities in funding and delivery of care for end-of-life COPD.
Asunto(s)
Grupos Focales , Personal de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Investigación Cualitativa , Cuidado Terminal , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Política de Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , AncianoRESUMEN
Introduction: Evidence suggests that advice from health care professionals (HCP) increases the likelihood of quit attempts and successful quitting of tobacco use. However, previous studies primarily focussed on cigarette smoking and did not include all forms of tobacco products. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and disparities in receiving HCP's advice to quit tobacco use (combustible or noncombustible) in the US adult population. Methods: Using the 2022 National Health Information Survey (NHIS) data, we examined 4,424 adults who reported (i) any tobacco product use within the past 12 months and (ii) having seen an HCP within the past 12 months. The outcome variable included the receipt of advice to quit tobacco use from an HCP, and predictors included sociodemographic variables. Weighted prevalence estimates were calculated, and multivariable regression analyses were conducted. Results: Over 38% of tobacco users who visited an HCP were advised to quit. The odds of receiving such advice were lower among Hispanics (AOR: 0.625; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.464-0.843];p = 0.002), males (AOR: 0.767; 95% CI [0.659-0.893], p = 0.001), those above the poverty level (AOR: 0.795; 95% CI [0.641-0.987];p = 0.037), foreign-born (AOR: 0.664; 95% CI [0.496-0.888]; p = 0.006), those with a bachelor's degree or higher educational level (AOR: 0.477; 95% CI [0.349-0.653]; p < 0.001) and those aged less than 45 years (AOR: 0.404; 95% CI: [0.344-0.473]; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The prevalence of receiving HCP's advice to quit tobacco use remains suboptimal and disparate among sociodemographic groups. Our findings call for strategic implementation of the USPHS's recommendation on treating tobacco use and taking further actions to equip HCPs with the training and resources needed to provide appropriate advice to quit tobacco.
Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiología , Anciano , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas EpidemiológicasRESUMEN
This review explores gender disparities in cardiac electrophysiology, highlighting differences in the electrical activity of the heart between men and women. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these variances for correct diagnosis and effective treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Women show distinct cardiac characteristics influenced by sex hormones, affecting their susceptibility to various arrhythmias. The manuscript covers the classification, mechanisms, and management of arrhythmias in women, considering factors such as pregnancy and menopause. By addressing these gender-specific nuances, it aims to improve healthcare practices and outcomes for female patients with cardiac rhythm disorders.
Esta revisión explora las disparidades de género en la electrofisiología cardiaca, destacando las diferencias en la actividad eléctrica del corazón entre hombres y mujeres. Se enfatiza la importancia de comprender estas variaciones para un diagnóstico correcto y un tratamiento efectivo de las arritmias cardiacas. Las mujeres muestran características cardiacas distintas influenciadas por las hormonas sexuales, lo que afecta su susceptibilidad a diversas arritmias. La revisión abarca la clasificación, los mecanismos y el manejo de las arritmias en las mujeres, considerando factores como el embarazo y la menopausia. Al abordar estos matices específicos de género, el objetivo es mejorar las prácticas de atención médica y los resultados para las pacientes de sexo femenino con trastornos del ritmo cardiaco.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Humanos , Femenino , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Factores Sexuales , Embarazo , Masculino , Hormonas Esteroides Gonadales , Menopausia/fisiología , Disparidades en Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Vaccination remains the most effective strategy to prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), with MenACWY, MenB and MenABCWY recommended for adolescents/young adults in the United States (US). However, vaccination coverage remains suboptimal, which could be related to population inequalities. To understand the impact of IMD risk, prevention and control inequalities, a global systematic literature review (Medline, Embase, 2012-2022) was conducted on individual, socioeconomic, and environmental inequalities associated with IMD risk, prevention and control in all ages. Studies on IMD risk (n = 15) and prevention (n = 14) inequalities were identified. IMD incidence proportions were higher in Medicaid versus commercially insured populations, and IMD mortality was higher in poorer neighborhoods. White adolescents, adolescents from lower income families, and with lower maternal education were more likely to receive MenB vaccination; while Black and Hispanic adolescents, and adolescents with higher family incomes, were more likely to receive MenACWY vaccination. Meningococcal vaccination was associated with being up-to-date with other vaccinations, having multiple healthcare/well child visits, having a pediatrician as healthcare provider (HCP), and attending private facilities; while being uninsured was associated with lower vaccination. States with a MenACWY vaccination mandate and higher pediatrician-to-children ratios had higher vaccination rates. Important inequalities were due to individual differences, socioeconomic, and environmental factors. IMD prevention is suboptimal, especially among adolescents/young adults. To improve health equity, health policy makers could ameliorate meningococcal vaccination coverage across the US, with simplified and stronger meningococcal vaccine recommendations from public health authorities, and initiatives to enhance parental/patient and HCP knowledge of IMD and vaccine recommendations.
(1) What is the context?Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a severe disease with a high risk of death and long-term sequelae in survivors. Three types of vaccines are recommended in the United States (US) to prevent IMD among adolescents and young adults: MenACWY, MenB, and MenABCWY. According to the World Health Organization, access to vaccination, regardless of socioeconomic status, is one of the most important ways to achieve equitable health standards. However, US vaccine coverage is suboptimal, especially among older adolescents and young adults, possibly because of population-based inequalities. This study investigated the impact of inequalities on IMD incidence, mortality, and vaccination in the US.(2) What is new?A systematic literature review identified several studies reporting on inequalities for IMD risk and prevention.IMD cases and deaths were more likely in poorer populations. Vaccination coverage varied according to race/ethnicity, income, and education levels. Vaccination was more likely in people with frequent healthcare visits, those who received other vaccinations, those who visit a pediatrician, and those who go to a non-public/private facility for care. Vaccination was less likely in uninsured people. States with a MenACWY vaccination mandate and with greater access to pediatricians had better vaccination rates.(3) What is the impact?Many inequalities exist in relation to the risk of getting IMD and the chances of getting vaccinated against IMD. To improve IMD prevention, health policy makers need to strengthen and simplify current meningococcal vaccine recommendations, and introduce/support initiatives that increase parental/patient and HCP awareness of IMD and vaccine recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adolescente , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neisseria meningitidis/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Accessibility is one of the crucial criteria for measuring the ease of access to public services in a region. Given China's historical rural-urban dualism and rapid urbanization process, there exist significant disparities in public services within metropolises. This study selects Nanjing as a representative metropolis and employs the Gaussian two-step floating catchment area method and an improved potential model to calculate the accessibility of comprehensive hospitals. Spatial autocorrelation and urban-rural disparities are analyzed, confirming spatial variations in healthcare service equity. The results show that: â The spatial variability of accessibility to comprehensive hospitals is significant. The Gaussian two-step floating catchment method overestimates overall accessibility, and for Nanjing, the improved potential model with ß = 1.5 proves more suitable. â¡Accessibility exhibits pronounced clustering characteristics. Healthcare conditions for residents in the northern part of Liuhe District, eastern part of Qixia District, western part of Pukou District, peripheral areas of Jiangning District, eastern part of Gaochun District, and residents in Lishui District need improvement. â¢Comprehensive healthcare services are relatively lacking in nearly 60% of rural areas. Our research findings provide valuable insights for improving spatial justice in public infrastructure in metropolises of developing countries.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Población Rural , Población Urbana , Humanos , China , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Generales/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Background: In Afghanistan, providing universal health coverage (UHC) in accordance with the principles of the UHC declaration is challenging on two fronts: the geographic topography of the country and the prevailing gender dynamics within the local culture. Methods: We conducted a desk review of underserved areas in the context of health services by gathering and analyzing existing literature, reports, and data using a combination of keywords and phrases such as: "underserved areas," "healthcare disparities," "access to healthcare," and "health services." The primary data were derived from an analysis of underserved populations conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) Afghanistan's Emergency Program, supplemented by information from in-country partners. In addition to other reports, this review focused on analyzing the geographical availability of primary healthcare (PHC) services by employing the guidelines set forth in the SPHERE framework. It also took into account the social dynamics within the Afghan population that may create barriers to equity in terms of demand and access to PHC services. Results: Although there are a significant number of primary healthcare facilities in operation (4,242), they are unevenly distributed across different regions of Afghanistan, resulting in almost 25% of the population being underserved. The underserved population is nearly equally distributed between genders, with the majority residing in rural communities. Women of childbearing age represent 28% of the underserved population. Children under the age of five represent 16-18% of the underserved population in all regions, except in the western region, where they represent between 12 and 13%. Individuals over 60 years of age represent 1-3% of the underserved population across all regions. More than 50% of the population in the Central Highlands of Afghanistan is underserved, followed by the western and southern regions. Ghor province in the western region has the highest proportion of underserved populations, followed by Zabul province in the southern region. Conclusion: Afghanistan is currently experiencing a protracted humanitarian crisis, with millions of people living in poverty and lacking access to healthcare. This situation exposes them to serious risks such as disease epidemics, starvation, and maternal and child mortality. It is crucial to implement alternative strategies to reach the most affected populations and to increase funding for the delivery of healthcare services in Afghanistan.
Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Área sin Atención Médica , Afganistán , Humanos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Equidad en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Organised by the 'Qualitative Long Covid Network', a workshop for qualitative Long COVID (LC) researchers, LC charity representatives and people with LC took place in June 2023, where research on the intersectional inequalities affecting LC prevalence, recognition and care was shared and discussed. METHODS: Five key themes were drawn up from presentations, discussions and reflections during the workshop, which are presented in this study. RESULTS: The following five themes are discussed: the unfairness of LC, difficulties in accessing care, mistrust of the healthcare system, a lack of understanding of LC and experiences of stigma and discrimination. Factors that widen or narrow inequalities related to LC were identified. CONCLUSION: A call to action is proposed to investigate and address inequalities through a robust LC research agenda that speaks with conviction to policy and decision-makers. We argue that there needs to be a strong investment in research and evidence-based policy and practice to mitigate the worst effects of the condition and address the inequalities in experience, treatment and support, which are experienced more often and more acutely by some of society's most vulnerable and disadvantaged individuals. PATIENT AND PUBLIC (PPI) CONTRIBUTION: Projects included in this article had PPI ongoing activity to inform their research. A member of the CONVALESCENCE PPI group presented at the QLC Network 'Long Covid and Health Inequalities' workshop, as did members of Long COVID Kids, Long COVID Support and Long COVID SOS charities. They were all invited to be co-authors of this article.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Política de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Estigma Social , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Inequidades en Salud , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Background: In the United States, Black and Latino children with asthma are more likely than White children with asthma to require emergency department visits or hospitalizations because of an asthma exacerbation. Although many cite patient-level socioeconomic status and access to health care as primary drivers of disparities, there is an emerging focus on a major root cause of disparities-systemic racism. Current conceptual models of asthma disparities depict the historical and current effects of systemic racism as the foundation for unequal exposures to social determinants of health, environmental exposures, epigenetic factors, and differential healthcare access and quality. These ultimately lead to biologic changes over the life course resulting in asthma morbidity and mortality. Methods: At the 2022 American Thoracic Society International Conference, a diverse panel of experts was assembled to identify gaps and opportunities to address systemic racism in childhood asthma research. Panelists found that to examine and address the impacts of systemic racism on children with asthma, researchers and medical systems that support biomedical research will need to 1) address the current gaps in our understanding of how to conceptualize and characterize the impacts of systemic racism on child health, 2) design research studies that leverage diverse disciplines and engage the communities affected by systemic racism in identifying and designing studies to evaluate interventions that address the racialized system that contributes to disparities in asthma health outcomes, and 3) address funding mechanisms and institutional research practices that will be needed to promote antiracism practices in research and its dissemination. Results: A thorough literature review and expert opinion discussion demonstrated that there are few studies in childhood asthma that identify systemic racism as a root cause of many of the disparities seen in children with asthma. Community engagement and participation in research studies is essential to design interventions to address the racialized system in which patients and families live. Dissemination and implementation studies with an equity lens will provide the multilevel evaluations required to understand the impacts of interventions to address systemic racism and the downstream impacts. To address the impacts of systemic racism and childhood asthma, there needs to be increased training for research teams, funding for studies addressing research that evaluates the impacts of racism, funding for diverse and multidisciplinary research teams including community members, and institutional and financial support of advocating for policy changes based on study findings. Conclusions: Innovative study design, new tools to identify the impacts of systemic racism, community engagement, and improved infrastructure and funding are all needed to support research that will address impacts of systemic racism on childhood asthma outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Racismo Sistemático , Humanos , Asma/terapia , Asma/etnología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Niño , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Investigación Biomédica , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Sociedades Médicas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de SaludRESUMEN
This cohort study compares rates of biochemical substance use screening among injured adolescents by sociodemographic characteristics including sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance status.
Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Adolescente , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
In 2021, 28.16% of Brazilians were aged 0-19 years, highlighting the critical need for medical care in diagnosing and treating cerebral palsy (CP). In developing countries, CP prevalence reaches 7/1000 live births, emphasizing the importance of healthcare access, which influences diagnosis and prognosis. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between health infrastructure across different Brazilian regions and its impact on hospitalization and mortality rates among children with CP and other paralytic syndromes. An ecological time-series design was used, analyzing secondary population-based data from DATASUS, covering January 2018 to December 2021. The data included healthcare facilities, physicians, hospitalizations, and deaths for individuals aged 0-19 years, with analysis conducted using Microsoft Excel. The results revealed significant disparities in healthcare infrastructure, particularly in the northern and northeastern regions. A notable correlation was found between healthcare inequalities and hospitalizations and mortality rates, with the northern region showing significant results (p = 0.03 for hospitalizations and p = 0.02 for mortalities). This study underscores significant regional disparities in healthcare access in Brazil, contributing to variations in hospitalization rates for children and adolescents, especially in the northern region.
Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , Parálisis Cerebral/epidemiología , Parálisis Cerebral/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Lactante , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Masculino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Parálisis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Autoimmune diseases are identified by the chronic inflammation and tissue damage resulting from unregulated immune responses throughout the body. Systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and Hashimoto's thyroiditis are among the 80+ characterized conditions, 80% of which are diagnosed in women. The compounded effects of biological sex and hormones; social identities, such as age, race, and gender; and other determinants on health highlight a pressing need for an inclusive approach to address disparities for women living with autoimmune diseases. Such an approach must recognize and incorporate intersectional experiences of diverse populations of women into biomedical research, clinical practice, and policy solutions. Research must prioritize inclusive designs, data collection, and representation of women in clinical studies. Clinical care must focus on developing guidelines and promoting patient-provider interactions that meet a range of demographic needs. Health care policies must support financial investments in research and equitable access to care. This review provides an overview of the impacts of autoimmune diseases on women's health through an intersectional lens, identifies persistent gaps in addressing the unique needs of women, and proposes recommendations for a comprehensive, equity-focused approach to mitigate disparities and better serve all women at risk for or living with autoimmune diseases.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Salud de la Mujer , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de SaludRESUMEN
Early racial disparities in COVID-19 vaccination rates have been attributed primarily to personal vaccine attitudes and behavior. Little attention has been paid to the possibility that inequitable vaccine distribution may have contributed to racial disparities in vaccine uptake when supplies were most scarce. We test the hypothesis that scarce vaccines were distributed inequitably using the shipping addresses of 385,930 COVID-19 vaccine doses distributed in the first 17 weeks of Pennsylvania's Phase 1 rollout (December 14, 2020 through April 12, 2021). All shipments we analyze were allocated via the Federal Retail Pharmacy Program, a public-private partnership coordinated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Overall, White people had an average of 81.4% more retail pharmacy program doses shipped to their neighborhoods than did Black people. Regression models reveal that weekly vaccine allocations determined by pharmacy chains-rather than initial shipment and administration site decisions requiring state and federal approval-drove these effects. All findings remained consistent after controlling for neighborhood differences in income, population density, insurance coverage, number of pharmacies, and other social determinants of health.Our findings suggest that the private distribution of scarce public resources should be assessed for racial impact, regulated as public resources, and monitored continuously.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Características de la Residencia , Humanos , Negro o Afroamericano , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/provisión & distribución , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Pennsylvania , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , BlancoRESUMEN
The introduction of the "da Vinci S HD Surgical System" marked a significant shift towards robotic surgeries in Japan. However, initial high costs and lack of efficacy data posed barriers to its widespread adoption. By 2023, more than 570 da Vinci units were operational in Japan, highlighting the growing acceptance of robotic surgery despite these challenges. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and regional disparities in the adoption of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) across Japan using diagnosis procedure combination data. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 2857 urban and 4184 regional hospitals across 47 prefectures in Japan. The study focused on the number of RALP procedures, da Vinci systems, and certified urological surgery proctors. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify significant factors influencing RALP adoption. Urban areas demonstrated a higher prevalence of RALP procedures and more da Vinci systems compared to regional areas, with urban hospitals performing an average of 937 RALP procedures compared to 195.5 in regional hospitals. The number of certified urological surgeons also showed significant urban-regional disparities, contributing to the overall imbalance. Our findings highlight substantial regional disparities in access to robot-assisted surgery in Japan, with urban areas benefiting from better access to advanced medical technologies and specialist training. Addressing these disparities will require targeted policies to improve the dissemination of robotic surgery systems and enhance training opportunities in regional cities.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Prostatectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Japón/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Masculino , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
This nationwide multidisciplinary survey found dissatisfaction among physicians with current osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture care, revealing significant disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up practices. Issues include poor communication and differing guidelines. Improving interdisciplinary collaboration and standardized care strategies is essential for better patient outcomes. PURPOSE: This survey aims to assess current preferred care practices for symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in the Netherlands, focusing on guideline adherence, identifying knowledge gaps, and clarifying consensus and collaboration across medical disciplines in OVCF treatment. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted via Qualtrics (Provo, UT) using a self-administered online survey distributed to 238 general practitioners and physicians in orthopedics, traumatology, internal medicine, rheumatology, and geriatrics working at 51 hospitals in the Netherlands. The survey, conducted in Dutch, included 36 multiple-choice and two open questions and was accessible via an anonymous email link or QR code. General practitioners received additional questions specific to their role. Data was anonymized, stored securely, and analyzed using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel and SPSS (Version 24). Open-ended responses were coded and categorized. The survey was conducted prior to the publication of the updated Federation of Medical Specialists guidelines in 2024. RESULTS: Physicians across various disciplines uniformly expressed dissatisfaction with current OVCF care. The survey highlighted significant disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up practices. A lack of communication between primary and secondary care providers and differing guidelines further complicate OVCF management. These issues point to considerable variation in clinical practice and gaps in interdisciplinary collaboration. CONCLUSION: Addressing the identified issues requires fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and creating cohesive care strategies. Ensuring access to diagnostic resources in both primary and secondary care and establishing coordinated care models promises more structured and standardized treatment. These steps are crucial for enhancing patient outcomes in OVCF management.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/terapia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Países Bajos , Fracturas por Compresión/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Simulation-based education is a key aspect of health professions education used to aid healthcare providers in developing and maintaining clinical skills. Rural and remote healthcare providers have limited access to skills development opportunities. Training tools such as simulators are primarily limited to university and hospital-based research centers in urban areas. This scoping review aimed to examine current literature to identify a partnership model involving academic institutions and non-profit organizations (NPOs) that focuses on facilitating the wider distribution of simulators. The five-stage Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis was used to guide the scoping review. The search was conducted on five literature databases, three grey literature databases and through manual reference searching with an applied time frame of 2000 to 2022. The search identified 15 articles that met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Analysis of the articles revealed that no partnership model currently exists that facilitates the production and distribution of simulators through a partnership between academic institutions and NPOs. Establishing the partnership, acquiring funding, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and dissemination were identified as key stages of a multi-institutional partnership. Further research is necessary to fill the gaps of the partnership process pertaining to the development and production of simulators to train healthcare providers.
Asunto(s)
Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro , Humanos , Universidades , Empleos en Salud/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Personal de Salud/educación , Disparidades en Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Reducing inequalities in preconception health and care is critical to improving the health and life chances of current and future generations. A hybrid workshop was held at the 2023 UK Preconception Early and Mid-Career Researchers (EMCR) Network conference to co-develop recommendations on ways to address inequalities in preconception health and care. The workshop engaged multi-disciplinary professionals across diverse career stages and people with lived experience (total n = 69). Interactive discussions explored barriers to achieving optimal preconception health, driving influences of inequalities and recommendations. The Socio-Ecological Model framed the identified themes, with recommendations structured at interpersonal (e.g. community engagement), institutional (e.g. integration of preconception care within existing services) and environmental/societal levels (e.g. education in schools). The co-developed recommendations provide a framework for addressing inequalities in preconception health, emphasising the importance of a whole-systems approach. Further research and evidence-based interventions are now needed to advance the advocacy and implementation of our recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Atención Preconceptiva , Humanos , Atención Preconceptiva/métodos , Reino Unido , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Health equity in medicine is critical to improving safety and quality of care for all patients. In order to achieve this, it is important that anesthesiologists understand the social barriers that exist for our patients in receiving high-quality and safe care, also known as social determinants of health. It is also important to understand social vulnerabilities to alleviate their impact on health outcomes in perioperative care. Beyond the social factors that impact the patient experience, it is important to understand, educate, and optimize those factors that impact delivery of high-quality and equitable care within our control as health care professionals.