Spinal aneurysmal bone cysts - case series.

Aneurysmal bone cysts are benign neoplastic lesions that are extensively vascularized and can occasionally exhibit destructive and expanding activity. They typically affect young people, with a small predilection toward females, and most frequently arise during the second decade of life. Aneurysmal bone cysts account for about 1% of all bone tumors and usually develop in long tubular bones, with the spine being much less commonly affected.

Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction approach for enhanced visualization in lumbar spine MR bone imaging.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which leverages k-space data, on the image quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) bone imaging using a 3D multi-echo in-phase sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 29 patients who underwent lumbar spine MRI, including an MR bone imaging sequence between January and April 2023, were analyzed. Images were reconstructed with and without SR-DLR (Matrix sizes: 960 × 960 and 320 × 320, respectively). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the vertebral body and spinal canal and the contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the vertebral body and spinal canal were quantitatively evaluated. Furthermore, the slope at half-peak points of the profile curve drawn across the posterior border of the vertebral body was calculated. Two radiologists independently assessed image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality of both image types using a 4-point scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using weighted kappa coefficients, and quantitative and qualitative scores were compared via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: SNRs of the vertebral body and spinal canal were notably improved in images with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Contrast and CNR were significantly enhanced with SR-DLR compared to those without SR-DLR (p = 0.023 and p = 0.022, respectively). The slope of the profile curve at half-peak points across the posterior border of the vertebral body and spinal canal was markedly higher with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Qualitative scores (noise: p < 0.001, contrast: p < 0.001, artifact p = 0.042, sharpness: p < 0.001, overall image quality: p < 0.001) were superior in images with SR-DLR compared to those without. Kappa analysis indicated moderate to good agreement (noise: κ = 0.56, contrast: κ = 0.51, artifact: κ = 0.46, sharpness: κ = 0.76, overall image quality: κ = 0.44). CONCLUSION: SR-DLR, which is based on k-space data, has the potential to enhance the image quality of lumbar spine MR bone imaging utilizing a 3D gradient echo in-phase sequence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The application of SR-DLR can lead to improvements in lumbar spine MR bone imaging quality.

Deep learning reconstructed T2-weighted Dixon imaging of the spine: Impact on acquisition time and image quality.

PURPOSE: To assess the image quality and impact on acquisition time of a novel deep learning based T2 Dixon sequence (T2DL) of the spine. METHODS: This prospective, single center study included n = 44 consecutive patients with a clinical indication for lumbar MRI at our university radiology department between September 2022 and March 2023. MRI examinations were performed on 1.5-T and 3-T scanners (MAGNETOM Aera and Vida; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using dedicated spine coils. The MR study protocol consisted of our standard clinical protocol, including a T2 weighted standard Dixon sequence (T2std) and an additional T2DL acquisition. The latter used a conventional sampling pattern with a higher parallel acceleration factor. The individual contrasts acquired for Dixon water-fat separation were then reconstructed using a dedicated research application. After reconstruction of the contrast images from k-space data, a conventional water-fat separation was performed to provide derived water images. Two readers with 6 and 4 years of experience in interpreting MSK imaging, respectively, analyzed the images in a randomized fashion. Regarding overall image quality, banding artifacts, artifacts, sharpness, noise, and diagnostic confidence were analyzed using a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = non-diagnostic to 5 = excellent image quality). Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (mean age 53 years (±18), male sex: 39 %) were prospectively included. Thirty-one examinations were performed on 1.5 T and 13 examinations on 3 T scanners. A sequence was successfully acquired in all patients. The total acquisition time of T2DL was 93 s at 1.5-T and 86 s at 3-T, compared to 235 s, and 257 s, respectively for T2std (reduction of acquisition time: 60.4 % at 1.5-T, and 66.5 % at 3-T; p < 0.01). Overall image quality was rated equal for both sequences (median T2DL: 5[3 -5], and median T2std: 5 [2 -5]; p = 0.57). T2DL showed significantly reduced noise levels compared to T2std (5 [4 -5] versus 4 [3 -4]; p < 0.001). In addition, sharpness was rated to be significantly higher in T2DL (5 [4 -5] versus 4 [3 -5]; p < 0.001). Although T2DL displayed significantly more banding artifacts (5 [2 -5] versus 5 [4 -5]; p < 0.001), no significant impact on readers diagnostic confidence between sequences was noted (T2std: 5 [2 -5], and T2DL: 5 [3 -5]; p = 0.61). Substantial inter-reader and intrareader agreement was observed for T2DL overall image quality (κ: 0.77, and κ: 0.8, respectively). CONCLUSION: T2DL is feasible, yields an image quality comparable to the reference standard while substantially reducing the acquisition time.

Automated detection, labelling and radiological grading of clinical spinal MRIs.

Spinal magnetic resonance (MR) scans are a vital tool for diagnosing the cause of back pain for many diseases and conditions. However, interpreting clinically useful information from these scans can be challenging, time-consuming and hard to reproduce across different radiologists. In this paper, we alleviate these problems by introducing a multi-stage automated pipeline for analysing spinal MR scans. This pipeline first detects and labels vertebral bodies across several commonly used sequences (e.g. T1w, T2w and STIR) and fields of view (e.g. lumbar, cervical, whole spine). Using these detections it then performs automated diagnosis for several spinal disorders, including intervertebral disc degenerative changes in T1w and T2w lumbar scans, and spinal metastases, cord compression and vertebral fractures. To achieve this, we propose a new method of vertebrae detection and labelling, using vector fields to group together detected vertebral landmarks and a language-modelling inspired beam search to determine the corresponding levels of the detections. We also employ a new transformer-based architecture to perform radiological grading which incorporates context from multiple vertebrae and sequences, as a real radiologist would. The performance of each stage of the pipeline is tested in isolation on several clinical datasets, each consisting of 66 to 421 scans. The outputs are compared to manual annotations of expert radiologists, demonstrating accurate vertebrae detection across a range of scan parameters. Similarly, the model's grading predictions for various types of disc degeneration and detection of spinal metastases closely match those of an expert radiologist. To aid future research, our code and trained models are made publicly available.

Fatty Infiltration in Paraspinal Muscles: Predicting the Outcome of Lumbar Surgery and Postoperative Complications.

Lumbar spine disorders often cause lower back pain, lower limb radiating pain, restricted movement, and neurological dysfunction, which seriously affect the quality of life of middle-aged and older people. It has been found that pathological changes in the spine often cause changes in the morphology and function of the paraspinal muscles (PSMs). Fatty infiltration (FI) in PSMs is closely associated with disc degeneration and Modic changes. And FI causes inflammatory responses that exacerbate the progression of lumbar spine disease and disrupt postoperative recovery. Magnetic resonance imaging can better distinguish between fat and muscle tissue with the threshold technique. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging multi-echo imaging techniques such as water-fat separation and proton density are currently popular for studying FI. Muscle fat content obtained based on these imaging sequences has greater accuracy, visualization, acquisition speed, and utility. The proton density fat fraction calculated from these techniques has been shown to evaluate more subtle changes in PSMs. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy can accurately reflect the relationship between FI and the degeneration of PSMs by measuring intracellular and extracellular lipid values to quantify muscle fat. We have pooled and analyzed published studies and found that patients with spinal disorders often exhibit FI in PSMs. Some studies suggest an association between FI and adverse surgical outcomes, although conflicting results exist. These suggest that clinicians should consider FI when assessing surgical risks and outcomes. Future studies should focus on understanding the biological mechanisms underlying FI and its predictive value in spinal surgery, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Spine Involvement and Vertebral Deformity in Patients Diagnosed with Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is an inflammatory disorder of bone, typically arising adjacent to the physes of long bones but also seen throughout the skeleton. For patients with spinal involvement, CRMO lesions can cause compression deformities with a range of severity from minimal anterior wedging to circumferential height loss, known as vertebra plana. This study examines a large cohort of CRMO patients to determine the prevalence of spine involvement and vertebral deformity. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of CRMO seen at our institution between January 2003 and December 2020. These patients were identified through a prospectively maintained database of all CRMO patients seen at the institution. A retrospective review was undertaken to identify all patients with spinal involvement and determine the prevalence of CRMO in the spine and its effects on vertebral height and deformity. RESULTS: Of 170 patients included in this study, 48 (28.2%) were found to have spinal involvement. Among patients with spinal involvement, vertebral body lesions were identified in 27 (56.3%) patients. The remaining lesions were in the sacrum or posterior elements. Radiographic evidence of the vertebral body height loss was noted in 23 of these 27 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of CRMO patients demonstrates that 28% of patients have spinal involvement, and 48% of those patients have vertebral body height loss. While the ideal treatment for spinal CRMO has yet to be determined, imaging studies, including whole-body MRI and spine-specific MRI, are useful in identifying vertebral lesions and deformities. Identification and surveillance of these lesions are important as the disorder has a relapsing and remitting course, and patients can develop significant vertebral body height loss. Once deformity has developed, we have seen no evidence of reconstitution of the height of the collapsed vertebra. Bisphosphonates have been successful in preventing the progression of vertebral body height loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II: Retrospective study investigating spinal involvement and prevalence of vertebral body deformity in patients diagnosed with CRMO.

Deep learning reconstruction for lumbar spine MRI acceleration: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: We compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) turbo spin-echo images reconstructed using a deep learning technique (TSE-DL) with standard turbo spin-echo (TSE-SD) images of the lumbar spine regarding image quality and detection performance of common degenerative pathologies. METHODS: This prospective, single-center study included 31 patients (15 males and 16 females; aged 51 ± 16 years (mean ± standard deviation)) who underwent lumbar spine exams with both TSE-SD and TSE-DL acquisitions for degenerative spine diseases. Images were analyzed by two radiologists and assessed for qualitative image quality using a 4-point Likert scale, quantitative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of anatomic landmarks, and detection of common pathologies. Paired-sample t, Wilcoxon, and McNemar tests, unweighted/linearly weighted Cohen κ statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used. RESULTS: Scan time for TSE-DL and TSE-SD protocols was 2:55 and 5:17 min:s, respectively. The overall image quality was either significantly higher for TSE-DL or not significantly different between TSE-SD and TSE-DL. TSE-DL demonstrated higher SNR and subject noise scores than TSE-SD. For pathology detection, the interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect for TSE-DL, with κ values ranging from 0.61 to 1.00; the interprotocol agreement was almost perfect for both readers, with κ values ranging from 0.84 to 1.00. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic confidence or detection rate of common pathologies between the two sequences (p ≥ 0.081). CONCLUSIONS: TSE-DL allowed for a 45% reduction in scan time over TSE-SD in lumbar spine MRI without compromising the overall image quality and showed comparable detection performance of common pathologies in the evaluation of degenerative lumbar spine changes. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning-reconstructed lumbar spine MRI protocol enabled a 45% reduction in scan time compared with conventional reconstruction, with comparable image quality and detection performance of common degenerative pathologies. KEY POINTS: • Lumbar spine MRI with deep learning reconstruction has broad application prospects. • Deep learning reconstruction of lumbar spine MRI saved 45% scan time without compromising overall image quality. • When compared with standard sequences, deep learning reconstruction showed similar detection performance of common degenerative lumbar spine pathologies.

Chiropractors' perceptions on the use of spinal radiographs in clinical practice: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Radiography is commonly used in the assessment of spinal disorders, despite a lack of high-quality evidence demonstrating improved clinical outcomes or additional benefit to the patient. There is disagreement amongst chiropractors regarding the appropriate use of radiography for clinical management. This study aims to qualitatively explore chiropractors' perceptions on the use of spinal radiographs in clinical practice with respect to how they determine when to order radiographs; and how they use radiographs to inform clinical management. METHODS: Online qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 Australian chiropractors who currently manage patients with spinal disorders. Convienence, snowball, and purposive sampling strategies were used to ensure an appropriate breadth and depth of participant characterisitcs and beliefs. Interview data were recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were developed to describe how chiropractors determined when to order radiographs. These themes included specific findings from the clinical encounter that may inform clinical management, their perceptions of radiation risk, and the influence of clinical experience/intuition. Three themes and four subthemes were developed for how chiropractors use radiographs to inform their management. These themes explored the use of radiography for the application of chiropractic technique, as well as the role of radiographs in predicting patient prognosis, and as an educational tool to provide reassurance. CONCLUSION: Australian chiropractors' decision-making around spinal radiography is diverse and can be influenced by a number of clinical and external factors. Previously unexplored uses of spinal radiography in clinical practice were highlighted. Some chiropractors reported potential benefits of radiography that are currently not supported by research evidence. Future research should address how radiographic findings are reported to patients with spinal disorders and how this could be optimised to improve patient outcomes.

Do Hounsfield Units From Intraoperative CT Scans Correlate With Preoperative Values?

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in forecasting postoperative complications using bone density metrics. Vertebral Hounsfield unit measurements obtained from CT scans performed for surgical planning or other purposes, known as opportunistic CTs, have shown promise for their ease of measurement and the ability to target density measurement to a particular region of interest. Concomitant with the rising interest in prognostic bone density measurement use has been the increasing adoption of intraoperative advanced imaging techniques. Despite the interest in both outcome prognostication and intraoperative advanced imaging, there is little information regarding the use of CT-based intraoperative imaging as a means to measure bone density. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Can vertebral Hounsfield units be reliably measured by physician reviewers from CT scans obtained intraoperatively? (2) Do Hounsfield units measured from intraoperative studies correlate with values measured from preoperative CT scans? METHODS: To be eligible for this retrospective study, patients had to have been treated with the use of an intraoperative CT scan for instrumented spinal fusion for either degenerative conditions or traumatic injuries between January 2015 and December 2022. Importantly, patients without a preoperative CT scan of the fused levels within 180 days before surgery or who were indicated for surgery because of infection, metastatic disease, or who were having revision surgery after prior instrumentation were excluded from the query. Of the 285 patients meeting these inclusion criteria, 53% (151) were initially excluded for the following reasons: 36% (102) had intraoperative CT scans obtained after placement of instrumentation, 16% (47) had undergone intraoperative CT scans but the studies were not accessible for Hounsfield unit measurement, and 0.7% (2) had prior kyphoplasty wherein the cement prevented Hounsfield unit measurement. Finally, an additional 19% (53) of patients were excluded because the preoperative CT and intraoperative CT were obtained at different peak voltages, which can influence Hounsfield unit measurement. This yielded a final population of 81 patients from whom 276 preoperative and 276 intraoperative vertebral Hounsfield unit measurements were taken. Hounsfield unit data were abstracted from the same vertebra(e) from both preoperative and intraoperative studies by two physician reviewers (one PGY3 and one PGY5 orthopaedic surgery resident, both pursuing spine surgery fellowships). For a small, representative subset of patients, measurements were taken by both reviewers. The feasibility and reliability of Hounsfield unit measurement were then assessed with interrater reliability of values measured from the same vertebra by the two different reviewers. To compare Hounsfield unit values from intraoperative CT scans with preoperative CT studies, an intraclass correlation using a two-way random effects, absolute agreement testing technique was employed. Because the data were formatted as multiple measurements from the same vertebra at different times, a repeated measures correlation was used to assess the relationship between preoperative and intraoperative Hounsfield unit values. Finally, a linear mixed model with patients handled as a random effect was used to control for different patient and clinical factors (age, BMI, use of bone density modifying agents, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification, smoking status, and total Charlson comorbidity index [CCI] score). RESULTS: We found that Hounsfield units can be reliably measured from intraoperative CT scans by human raters with good concordance. Hounsfield unit measurements of 31 vertebrae from a representative sample of 10 patients, measured by both reviewers, demonstrated a correlation value of 0.82 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.91), indicating good correlation. With regard to the relationship between preoperative and intraoperative measurements of the same vertebra, repeated measures correlation testing demonstrated no correlation between preoperative and intraoperative measurements (r = 0.01 [95% CI -0.13 to 0.15]; p = 0.84). When controlling for patient and clinical factors, we continued to observe no relationship between preoperative and intraoperative Hounsfield unit measurements. CONCLUSION: As intraoperative CT and measurement of vertebral Hounsfield units both become increasingly popular, it would be a natural extension for spine surgeons to try to extract Hounsfield unit data from intraoperative CTs. However, we found that although it is feasible to measure Hounsfield data from intraoperative CT scans, the obtained values do not have any predictable relationship with values obtained from preoperative studies, and thus, these values should not be used interchangeably. With this knowledge, future studies should explore the prognostic value of intraoperative Hounsfield unit measurements as a distinct entity from preoperative measurements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Baastrup's disease prevalence across various age groups and its association with degenerative changes: insights from STIR sequence in MRI.

PURPOSE: Baastrup's disease is characterized by abnormal contact between adjacent spinous processes. Our study is the first to systematically incorporate the STIR sequence, recognized for its heightened sensitivity to fluid and edema, into the MRI protocol for diagnosing Baastrup's disease in symptomatic individuals. The objective is to determine its prevalence and association with lumbar spinal degenerative changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lumbar spinal MRI examinations of 375 patients performed between January 2021 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists. Baastrup's disease was diagnosed based on meeting any of the following criteria: lumbar interspinous bursitis, hyperintense signal changes in adjacent spinous processes, and ligaments on the STIR sequence. The study also investigated the presence of degenerative changes and interreader agreement among radiologists. RESULTS: Baastrup's disease was found in 141 of 375 individuals (37.8%). It correlated significantly with degenerative lumbar changes such as bulging (P = 0.0012), herniation (P = 0.0033), disc degeneration (P = 0.0013), Modic changes (P = 0.034), facet osteoarthritis (P = 0.0041), spinal stenosis (P = 0.005), and anterolisthesis (P = 0.0049). No significant associations were observed with gender (P = 0.468) or retrolisthesis (P = 0.167). Its occurrence increased gradually, peaking at 87.5% in individuals aged 80 and above. Radiologists showed complete agreement with Baastrup's diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Baastrup's disease is more commonly observed than being considered rare, displaying an incremental occurrence with increasing age in symptomatic individuals notably discernible on the STIR sequence. Using the STIR sequence seems to promote a consensus among radiologists, irrespective of their experience levels.

Comparison of image quality and diagnostic efficacy of routine clinical lumbar spine imaging at 0.55T and 1.5/3T.

PURPOSE: To compare image quality, assess inter-reader variability, and evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of routine clinical lumbar spine sequences at 0.55T compared with those collected at 1.5/3T to assess common spine pathology. METHODS: 665 image series across 70 studies, collected at 0.55T and 1.5/3T, were assessed by two neuroradiology fellows for overall imaging quality (OIQ), artifacts, and accurate visualization of anatomical features (intervertebral discs, neural foramina, spinal cord, bone marrow, and conus / cauda equina nerve roots) using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic to 4 = excellent). For the 0.55T scans, the most appropriate diagnosis(es) from a picklist of common spine pathologies was selected. The mean ± SD of all scores for all features for each sequence and reader at 0.55T and 1.5/3T were calculated. Paired t-tests (p ≤ 0.05) were used to compare ratings between field strengths. The inter-reader agreement was calculated using linear-weighted Cohen's Kappa coefficient (p ≤ 0.05). Unpaired VCG analysis for OIQ was additionally employed to represent differences between 0.55T and 1.5/3T (95 % CI). RESULTS: All sequences at 0.55T were rated as acceptable (≥2) for diagnostic use by both readers despite significantly lower scores for some compared to those at 1.5/3T. While there was low inter-reader agreement on individual scores, the agreement on the diagnosis was high, demonstrating the potential of this system for detecting routine spine pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical lumbar spine imaging at 0.55T produces diagnostic-quality images demonstrating the feasibility of its use in diagnosing spinal pathology, including osteomyelitis/discitis, post-surgical changes with complications, and metastatic disease.

Butterfly Vertebra: A Retrospective Study of 30 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Butterfly vertebra (BV) is a rare congenital spinal anomaly for which there is a paucity of large-scale retrospective studies and established guidelines for treatment. The objective of this study was to elucidate the clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and therapeutic approaches for BV. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 patients diagnosed with BV at our hospital from 2009 to 2023, examining clinical data, imaging findings, and clinical interventions. RESULTS: The analysis comprised a cohort of 30 patients, consisting of 15 males and 15 females, with a mean age of 27.63 ± 19.84 years. Imaging studies indicated that the majority of vertebral bodies affected by BV were single-segmented (63.3%, 19/30) and less commonly multi-segmented (36.7%, 11/30). These findings frequently coexisted with other medical conditions, most notably spinal scoliosis (76.7%, 23/30). Furthermore, the study identified a range of spinal abnormalities among patients, including hemivertebral deformity (30.0%, 9/30), spinal cleft (10.0%, 3/30), lumbar disc protrusion or herniation (10.0%, 3/30), vertebral slippage (10.0%, 3/30), thoracic kyphosis deformity (6.67%, 2/30), vertebral fusion deformity (6.67%, 2/30), compressive fractures (3.3%, 1/30), and vertebral developmental anomalies (3.3%, 1/30). Clinical intervention resulted in symptom relief for 23 nonsurgical patients through lifestyle modifications, analgesic use, and physical therapy. Seven surgical patients underwent appropriate surgical procedures, leading to satisfaction and adherence to regular postoperative follow-up appointments. CONCLUSIONS: BV is a rare vertebral anomaly that can be easily misdiagnosed due to its similarity to other diseases. Consequently, it is imperative to enhance vigilance in the differential diagnosis process in order to promptly recognize BV. Furthermore, in cases where patients present with additional associated radiographic findings, a thorough evaluation is typically warranted and timely measures should be taken for treatment.

Fast and accurate 3-D spine MRI segmentation using FastCleverSeg.

Accurate and efficient segmenting of vertebral bodies, muscles, and discs is crucial for analyzing various spinal diseases. However, traditional methods are either laborious and time-consuming (manual segmentation) or require extensive training data (fully automatic segmentation). FastCleverSeg, our proposed semi-automatic segmentation approach, addresses those limitations by significantly reducing user interaction while maintaining high accuracy. First, we reduce user interaction by requiring the manual annotation of only two or three slices. Next, we automatically Estimate the Annotation on Intermediary Slices (EANIS) using traditional computer vision/graphics concepts. Finally, our proposed method leverages improved voxel weight balancing to achieve fast and precise volumetric segmentation in the segmentation process. Experimental evaluations on our assembled diverse MRI databases comprising 179 patients (60 male, 119 female), demonstrate a remarkable 25 ms (30 ms standard deviation) processing time and a significant reduction in user interaction compared to existing approaches. Importantly, FastCleverSeg maintains or surpasses the segmentation quality of competing methods, achieving a Dice score of 94%. This invaluable tool empowers physicians to efficiently generate reliable ground truths, expediting the segmentation process and paving the way for future integration with deep learning approaches. In turn, this opens exciting possibilities for future fully automated spine segmentation.

Imaging review of the atypical spinal epidural space pathologies.

Pathologies affecting the spinal epidural space (SES) comprise various abnormalities. However, they all have the potential to cause thecal sac narrowing or spinal cord compression. In this review, we group these pathologies into degenerative, infective, neoplastic, vascular, traumatic, and others, focusing on their imaging features. Degenerative pathologies of the SES range from disc to facet disease, with a particular emphasis on the less common degenerative pathologies in this review. Infective pathologies affecting the epidural space include spondylodiscitis and associated epidural phlegmon and abscess. Neoplasms arising from typical SES components include neurofibroma, hemangioma, and liposarcoma. MRI is the best modality to assess the anatomy and abnormalities of the epidural space. MRI, combined with computed tomography, or a radiograph, is useful for the evaluation of bones or radiopaque foreign bodies.

Diagnostic evaluation of deep learning accelerated lumbar spine MRI.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning (DL) accelerated MR techniques have emerged as a promising approach to accelerate routine MR exams. While prior studies explored DL acceleration for specific lumbar MRI sequences, a gap remains in comprehending the impact of a fully DL-based MRI protocol on scan time and diagnostic quality for routine lumbar spine MRI. To address this, we assessed the image quality and diagnostic performance of a DL-accelerated lumbar spine MRI protocol in comparison to a conventional protocol. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 36 consecutive outpatients undergoing non-contrast enhanced lumbar spine MRIs. Both protocols included sagittal T1, T2, STIR, and axial T2-weighted images. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently reviewed images for foraminal stenosis, spinal canal stenosis, nerve root compression, and facet arthropathy. Grading comparison employed the Wilcoxon signed rank test. For the head-to-head comparison, a 5-point Likert scale to assess image quality, considering artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), anatomical structure visualization, and overall diagnostic quality. We applied a 15% noninferiority margin to determine whether the DL-accelerated protocol was noninferior. RESULTS: No significant differences existed between protocols when evaluating foraminal and spinal canal stenosis, nerve compression, or facet arthropathy (all p > .05). The DL-spine protocol was noninferior for overall diagnostic quality and visualization of the cord, CSF, intervertebral disc, and nerve roots. However, it exhibited reduced SNR and increased artifact perception. Interobserver reproducibility ranged from moderate to substantial (κ = 0.50-0.76). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that DL reconstruction in spine imaging effectively reduces acquisition times while maintaining comparable diagnostic quality to conventional MRI.

Surgical management of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian: a narrative review.

Optimal management paradigms of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian population are controversial given the higher incidence of comorbidities with concern for poor prognosis and fear of increased complications associated with surgical management. In this narrative review, we aim to detail the complex clinical considerations when approaching odontoid screw fixation/instrumented fusion, spinal decompression, and spinal fusion in the octogenarian. Literature review was conducted via Google Scholar and PubMed databases, with literature selected based on statistical power and clinical relevance to the following pathologies/surgical techniques: odontoid fracture, surgical decompression, and surgical fusion in the octogenarian. The aforementioned pathologies were selected based on prevalence in the advanced-age population in which surgical screening techniques and management remain nonuniform. Preoperative evaluation of the octogenarian patient increasingly includes frailty, sarcopenia, and osteopenia/osteoporosis assessments. In cases of odontoid fracture, conservative management appears to provide beneficial clinical outcomes with lower rates of complication compared to surgery; however, rates of radiographic odontoid fusion are far lower in conservatively managed patients. Regarding surgical decompression and fusion, the presence of comorbidities may be more predictive of outcome rather than age status, with the advent of minimally invasive techniques providing safety and efficacy in the surgical management of this age cohort. Age status may be less pertinent than previously thought in the decision to pursue spinal surgery for odontoid fracture, spinal decompression, or spinal fusion; however, each of these procedures has respective risks and benefits that must be considered within the context of each patient's comorbidity profile.