Surgical Repair vs Splenectomy in Patients With Severe Traumatic Spleen Injuries.

Importance: The spleen is often removed in laparotomy after traumatic abdominal injury, with little effort made to preserve the spleen. Objective: To explore the association of surgical management (splenic repair vs splenectomy) with outcomes in patients with traumatic splenic injuries undergoing laparotomy and to determine whether splenic repair is associated with lower mortality compared with splenectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a trauma registry-based cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from January 2013 to December 2019. Participants included adult patients with severe splenic injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] grades 3-5) undergoing laparotomy after traumatic injury within 6 hours of admission. Data analysis was performed from April to August 2023. Exposures: Splenic repair vs splenectomy in patients with severe traumatic splenic injury. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were compared using different statistical approaches, including 1:1 exact matching with consecutive conditional logistic regression analysis as the primary analysis and multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and inverse-probability weighting as sensitivity analyses. Results: A total of 11 247 patients (median [IQR] age, 35 [24-52] years; 8179 men [72.7%]) with a severe traumatic splenic injury undergoing laparotomy were identified. Of these, 10 820 patients (96.2%) underwent splenectomy, and 427 (3.8%) underwent splenic repair. Among patients who underwent an initial splenic salvage procedure, 23 (5.3%) required a splenectomy during the subsequent hospital stay; 400 patients with splenic preservation were matched with 400 patients who underwent splenectomy (matched for age, sex, hypotension, trauma mechanism, AIS spleen grade, and AIS groups [0-2, 3, and 4-5] for head, face, neck, thorax, spine, and lower and upper extremity). Mortality was significantly lower in the splenic repair group vs the splenectomy group (26 patients [6.5%] vs 51 patients [12.8%]). The association of splenic repair with lower mortality was subsequently verified by conditional regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; P = .03). Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and inverse-probability weighting confirmed this association. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study, splenic repair was independently associated with lower mortality compared with splenectomy during laparotomy after traumatic splenic injury. These findings suggest that efforts to preserve the spleen might be indicated in selected cases of severe splenic injuries.

Clinical Outcomes of Splenic Artery Embolization Versus Splenectomy in the Management of Hemodynamically Stable High-Grade Blunt Splenic Injuries: A National Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE) versus splenectomy in adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) compared SAE versus splenectomy in adults with blunt high-grade splenic injuries (grade ≥ IV). Patients were stratified first by hemodynamic status then splenic injury grade. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and transfusion requirements at four and 24 h from arrival. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred nine hemodynamically stable patients were analyzed, with 2975 (95.7%) undergoing splenectomy and 134 (4.3%) with SAE. One thousand eight hundred sixty five patients had grade IV splenic injuries, and 1244 had grade V. Patients managed with SAE had 72% lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; P = 0.002), significantly shorter ICU-LOS (7 versus 9 d, 95%, P = 0.028), and received a mean of 1606 mL less packed red blood cells at four h compared to those undergoing splenectomy. Patients with grade IV or V injuries both had significantly lower odds of mortality (IV: OR 0.153, P < 0.001; V: OR 0.365, P = 0.041) and were given less packed red blood cells within four h when treated with SAE (2056 mL versus 405 mL, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SAE may be a safer and more effective management approach for hemodynamically stable adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries, as demonstrated by its association with significantly lower rates of in-hospital mortality, shorter ICU-LOS, and lower transfusion requirements compared to splenectomy.

A Systematic Review of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive (MI) and open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search and meta-analyses were performed focusing on short-term surgical oncology of MI- and open-RAMPS. RESULTS: A total of seven studies with 423 patients were included in this review. The equivalent short-term and long-term outcomes of the groups were confirmed. The results of meta-analyses found no significant difference in R0 resection rates (OR=1.78, 95%CI=0.76-4.15, p=0.18), although MI-RAMPS was associated with a smaller number of dissected lymph nodes (MD=-3.14, 95%CI=-4.75 - -1.53, p<0.001) and lymph node metastases (OR=0.55, 95%CI=0.31-0.97, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: MI-RAMPS could provide surgically and oncologically feasible outcomes for well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer as compared to open-RAMPS. However, further high-level evidence should be needed to confirm survival benefits following MI-RAMPS.

Lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: Establishment of D2 and the current position of splenectomy in Europe and Japan.

Two European phase III trials comparing D1 and D2 demonstrated that D2 did not improve the overall survival and was associated with a high mortality related to splenectomy. However, a long-term follow-up study showed that the gastric cancer-related death rate was significantly higher in D1 than D2. Based on these findings, the standard surgery in Europe became D2 without pancreatico-splenectomy to prevent mortality. In contrast, the JCOG9501 phase III comparing D2 and D2 plus para-aortic nodal dissection did not showed a survival efficacy of extended lymphadenectomy, but the mortality rate was quite low in both surgeries. Subsequently, the JCOG0110 phase III study comparing D2 and spleen-preserving D2 for upper gastric cancer not invading the greater curvature clearly showed the non-inferiority of spleen preservation. Thus, spleen-preserving D2 was made the standard surgery for these tumors in Japan. However, splenectomy is often selected for complete dissection of the splenic-hilar nodes, a frequent metastatic site for upper gastric tumors invading the greater curvature. Recently, an approach involving splenic hilar nodal dissection without splenectomy has been developed.

Short- and long-term outcomes after concurrent splenectomy during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Splenectomy is often performed during open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair, because capsular tears are common and can be associated with significant bleeding. It is unknown whether splenectomy affects the short- or long-term outcomes after TAAA repair. METHODS: All open type I to IV TAAA repairs performed from 1987 to June 2015 were evaluated using a single institutional database. The primary endpoints were in-hospital death, major adverse events (MAE) and long-term survival. The secondary endpoint was hospital length of stay (LOS). All repairs performed for aneurysm rupture were excluded. Univariate analysis was conducted using the Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Logistic and linear multivariable regression were used for the in-hospital endpoints, and survival analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling and Kaplan-Meier techniques. RESULTS: A total of 649 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Of the 649 patients, 150 (23%) underwent concurrent splenectomy (CS) and six required emergency splenectomy secondary to bleeding postoperatively, leading to 156 cases of total in-hospital splenectomy. The perioperative mortality rate was 5.2% in the CS group and 5.2% in the non-CS group (P = 1.0). MAE were experienced by 48% of the CS patients compared with 34% of the non-CS patients (P = .003). Multivariable analysis revealed splenectomy was not independently predictive of perioperative death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-2.23; P = .9). However, splenectomy was independently associated with any MAE (adjusted odds ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.19-2.65; P = .005). Splenectomy was also associated with a longer length of stay (+5.39 days; 95% CI, 1.86-8.92; P = .003). No survival difference was found between the cohorts in the total splenectomy cohort in the unadjusted (log-rank P = 1.0) or adjusted (splenectomy adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.35; P = .9). CONCLUSIONS: CS during open TAAA repair did not lead to increased perioperative mortality but did lead to significantly increased perioperative morbidity and longer hospital lengths of stay. We found no difference in long-term survival outcomes when CS was performed. Splenectomy during TAAA repair did not affect long-term survival.

Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Perioperative COVID-19 Infection: Prospective Cohort in General, Gastroesophagic, Hepatobiliary, and Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome due to coronavirus 2 has rapidly spread worldwide in an unprecedented pandemic. Patients with an ongoing COVID-19 infection requiring surgery have higher risk of mortality and complications. This study describes the mortality and morbidity in patients with perioperative COVID-19 infection undergoing elective and emergency surgeries. METHODS: Prospective cohort of consecutive patients who required a general, gastroesophageal, hepatobiliary, colorectal, or emergency surgery during COVID-19 pandemic at an academic teaching hospital. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and major complications. Secondary outcomes were specific respiratory mortality and complications. RESULTS: A total of 701 patients underwent surgery, 39 (5.6%) with a perioperative COVID-19 infection. 30-day mortality was 12.8% and 1.4% in patients with and without COVID-19 infection, respectively (p < 0.001). Major surgical complications occurred in 25.6% and 6.8% in patients with and without COVID-19 infection, respectively (p < 0.001). Respiratory complications occurred in 30.8% and 1.4% in patients with and without COVID-19 infection, respectively (p < 0.001). Mortality due to a respiratory complication was 100% and 11.1% in patients with and without COVID-19 infection, respectively (p < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: 30-day mortality and surgical complications are higher in patients with perioperative COVID-19 infection. Indications for elective surgery need to be reserved for non-deferrable procedures in order to avoid unnecessary risks of non-urgent procedures.

Contemporary Management of Pediatric Blunt Splenic Trauma: A National Trauma Databank Analysis.

PURPOSE: To quantify changes in the management of pediatric patients with isolated splenic injury from 2007 to 2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients under 18 years old with registered splenic injury in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2015) were identified. Splenic injuries were categorized into 5 management types: nonoperative management (NOM), embolization, splenic repair, splenectomy, or a combination therapy. Linear mixed models accounting for confounding variables were used to examine the direct impact of management on length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) days, and ventilator days. RESULTS: Of included patients (n = 24,128), 90.3% (n = 21,789), 5.6% (n = 1,361), and 2.7% (n = 640) had NOM, splenectomy, and embolization, respectively. From 2007 to 2015, the rate of embolization increased from 1.5% to 3.5%, and the rate of splenectomy decreased from 6.9% to 4.4%. Combining injury grades, NOM was associated with the shortest LOS (5.1 days), ICU days (1.9 days), and ventilator days (0.5 day). Moreover, splenectomy was associated with longer LOS (10.1 days), ICU days (4.5 days), and ventilator days (2.1 days) than NOM. The average failure rate of NOM was 1.5% (180 failures/12,378 cases). Average embolization failure was 1.3% (6 failures/456 cases). Splenic artery embolization was associated with lower mortality than splenectomy (OR: 0.10, P <.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in mortality between embolization and NOM (OR: 0.96, P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric splenic injury, NOM is the most utilized and associated with favorable outcomes, most notably in grades III to V pediatric splenic injury. If intervention is needed, embolization is effective and increasingly utilized most significantly in lower grade injuries.

Splenectomy before hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hypersplenism: A retrospective study.

ABSTRACT: The spleen plays an important role in tumor progression and the curative effects of splenectomy before hepatectomy for hypersplenism and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not clear. We investigated whether splenectomy before hepatectomy increases survival rate among patients with HCC and hypersplenism compared with that of patients who underwent synchronous hepatectomy and splenectomy or hepatectomy alone.Between January 2011 and December 2016, 266 patients who underwent hepatectomy as a result of HCC and portal hypertension secondary to hepatitis were retrospectively analyzed. Their perioperative complications and survival outcome were evaluated.Patients underwent synchronous hepatectomy and splenectomy (H-S group) and underwent splenectomy before hepatectomy (H-preS group) exhibited significantly higher disease-free survival (DFS) rates than those of patients underwent hepatectomy alone (H-O group). The DFS rates for patients in the H-S group, H-preS group, and H-O group were 74.6%, 48.4%, 39.8%, and 80.1%, 54.2%, 40.1%, and 60.5%, 30.3%, 13.3%, at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery, respectively. Tumor size, tumors number, and levels of alpha fetoprotein (AFP) were independent risk factors for DFS. Gender and tumor size were independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). The preoperative white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT) counts were significantly higher in the H-preS group than in those of the H-S group and the H-O group. After operation, the WBC and PLT counts in the H-S group and H-preS groups were significantly higher compared to those of the H-O group.No matter splenectomy before hepatectomy or synchronous hepatectomy and splenectomy, hepatectomy with splenectomy may improve DFS rates in patients with HCC and hypersplenism, and splenectomy before hepatectomy alleviates hypersplenism without an increased surgical risk.

Cytoreductive surgery including distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy in advanced stage ovarian cancer: Two centers analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Complex procedures such as distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy (DPS) may be required for R0 resection in patients with ovarian cancer (OC). These procedures can increase survival and cause serious morbidity. We aimed to present our experience in this field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients who underwent DPS for OC between January 2004 and July 2018 in two centers (Hacettepe University Hospital, Etlik Hospital) were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 310 min (220-570 min). None of the patients required transfusion. No perioperative mortality was observed. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 12 days (ranging from 8 to 33 days). The number of patients with early postoperative complications was four (30.7%). One of these patients was complicated by intestinal perforation, one with pancreatic fistula, one with pneumonia and the other with atelectasis. Other complications were observed conservatively. Ten patients underwent 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy postoperatively. The median value of the postoperative chemotherapy period was 20 days (range 11-47 days). The median follow-up period was 46 months (2-144 months). Ten patients had recurrence. Eleven patients died of disease. Two patients are stil alive. Disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were 16 and 63 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: DPS for cytoreductive surgery is a procedure that increases morbidity, but most of the complications can be treated conservatively. Considering the increase in survival, it is considered to be a valuable procedure in upper abdominal disease.

Non-Pharmacologic Management of Splenomegaly for Patients with Myelofibrosis: Is There Any Role for Splenectomy or Splenic Radiation in 2020?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myelofibrosis is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm which can lead to massive splenomegaly. Currently approved medical therapies do not improve splenomegaly in all patients and effects are not sustained. Thus, spleen-directed therapies (i.e., splenectomy and splenic irradiation) have been used in some cases to palliate the signs and symptoms of the disease. Here, we critically review the literature regarding palliative splenectomy and splenic irradiation in myelofibrosis, and discuss their position in the current treatment landscape. RECENT FINDINGS: Retrospective studies have demonstrated that splenectomy improves symptoms of splenomegaly, decreases complications of portal hypertension, and decreases transfusion dependence. However, it carries a significant peri-operative and long-term morbidity and mortality rate. Splenic irradiation reduces splenic size but is limited by duration of response and myelosuppression. Spleen-directed therapies in myelofibrosis may be considered for refractory symptoms and complications of massive splenomegaly after carefully weighing the associated risks, though overall survival may not be impacted. Development of medical therapies that target and reverse the underlying disease pathophysiology is required in order to have a significant impact on the natural history of the disease process.

100 Robotic Distal Pancreatectomies: The Future at Hand.

INTRODUCTION: This study was undertaken to examine 100 consecutive robotic distal pancreatectomies with splenectomies, and to compare our outcomes to predicted outcomes as calculated using the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program (ACS NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator and to the outcomes contained within NSQIP. METHODS: Outcomes were compared with predicted outcomes, calculated using the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator, and with outcomes documented in NSQIP for distal pancreatectomy. For illustrative purposes, data are presented as median (mean ± SD). RESULTS: Patients who underwent robotic distal pancreatectomy were of age 67 (63 ± 13.4) years with a BMI of 29 (29 ± 6.3) kg/m2, with 49% being women. Operative duration was 242 (265 ± 112.2) minutes and estimated blood loss was 110 (211 ± 233.9) mL. Predicted outcomes were similar to those reported in NSQIP. Our actual outcomes were significantly superior to the predicted outcomes for serious complication, any complication, surgical site infection, sepsis, and length of stay. Compared to NSQIP outcomes, our actual outcomes for serious complication, any complication, surgical site infection, sepsis, and delayed gastric emptying were significantly superior. Twelve percent of operations were converted to "open." There were 3 deaths within 30 days, similar to predicted outcomes. Deaths were due to sepsis (2) and respiratory failure (1). CONCLUSION: Our patients' predicted outcomes were the same as national outcomes; our patients were not a select group. However, their actual outcomes were like or significantly superior than those predicted by NSQIP or reported in NSQIP. We believe that the robot has the future of distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy.

Therapeutic value of splenectomy to dissect splenic hilar lymph nodes for type 4 gastric cancer involving the greater curvature, compared with other types.

BACKGROUND: Whether splenectomy for splenic hilar lymph node (No. 10) dissection in type 4 gastric cancer involving the greater curvature is necessary is not established. Patients with type 4 gastric cancer often experience peritoneal relapse, despite curative surgery, and total gastrectomy with splenectomy is frequently associated with infectious complications. METHOD: Patients with cT2-T4 gastric cancer in the upper or middle third of the stomach, or both, involving the greater curvature who underwent R0 total gastrectomy with splenectomy between 2006 and 2016 were selected. Clinicopathological findings, postoperative complications, the incidence of lymph node metastasis, and the therapeutic value index of each station were compared between type 4 and non-type 4 gastric cancer. RESULTS: We enrolled 50 patients with type 4 and 60 with non-type 4. The former had a significantly higher proportion of the undifferentiated type and larger and deeper tumors. The overall incidence of Grade III or higher complications was 20.9%. The incidence of No. 10 metastasis was 26.0% in type 4 and 31.7% in non-type 4. Although the therapeutic value index of the No. 10 was 13.7 in type 4 and 15.0 in non-type 4, the index of type 4 ranked just below several peri-gastric stations and seventh, while that in non-type 4 ranked second. CONCLUSION: Splenectomy for No. 10 dissection may be oncologically valid for type 4 gastric cancer involving the greater curvature. A safer procedure for No. 10 dissection should be established.

Report of a 'consensus' on the lines of therapy for primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults, promoted by the Italian Gruppo di Studio delle Piastrine.

Despite the publication in 2009 of a paper on 'terms and definitions of immune thrombocytopenia' (ITP), some unresolved issues remain and are reflected by the disagreement in the treatment suggested for primary ITP in adults. Considering that these disagreements could be ascribed to non-shared goals, we generated a 'consensus' on some terms, definitions, and assertions useful for classifying the different lines of treatment for primary ITP in adults according to their indications and goals. Agreement on the appropriateness of the single assertions was obtained by consensus for the following indicators: 1. classification of four 'lines of therapy'; 2. acceptance of the expression 'sequences of disease' for the indications of the respective four lines of treatment; 3I . practicability of splenectomy; 3Ib . acceptance, with only some exceptions, of a 'timing for elective splenectomy of 12 months'; and 4a-d . 'goals of the four lines of therapy.' On the basis of the consensus, a classification of four lines of treatment for primary ITP in adults was produced. In our opinion, this classification, whose validity is not influenced by the recently published new guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and reviews, could reduce the disagreement that still exists regarding the treatment of the disease.

Is splenectomy for dissecting splenic hilar lymph nodes justified for scirrhous gastric cancer?

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy for dissecting splenic hilar lymph nodes (#10) should be avoided for most gastric cancer, considering the high morbidity and lack of any survival benefit, but it is often selected for scirrhous gastric cancer because this type frequently invades the whole stomach and lymph nodes. Splenectomy is necessary for dissecting #10; however, the survival benefit of dissecting #10 is unclear. METHODS: Patients who had scirrhous gastric cancer and underwent D2 total gastrectomy with splenectomy at National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan, between 2000 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The therapeutic value index was calculated by multiplying the metastatic rate of each nodal station and the 5-year survival of patients who had metastasis to each node. RESULTS: In total, 137 patients were eligible for the present study. The most frequent metastatic node was #3(58%), followed by #4d(46%), #1(35%), #4sb(23%), #6(22%), #7(21%), #4sa(18%), #10(15%), #2(14%), #11p(14%), #11d(13%), #9(13%), and #8a(11%). These lymph nodes had a metastatic rate of more than 10%. The node station with the highest index was #3(18.9), followed by #4d(14.1), #1(10.8), #4sa(6.11), #4sb(6.06), #10(5.09), #7(4.39), #11d(4.36), #11p(4.06), #2(2.93), #8a(2.18), and #9(1.45). The index of #10 exceeded that of #2, #7, #8a, and #9, which are the key nodes dissected in D2. CONCLUSION: The metastatic rate of the splenic hilar lymph nodes was relatively high, and the therapeutic index was the sixth highest among the 15 regional lymph nodes included in D2 dissection. Splenectomy for dissecting splenic hilar lymph nodes would be justified for scirrhous gastric cancer.

High-Dimensional Analysis of Postsplenectomy Peripheral Immune Cell Changes.

Although the consequences of splenectomy are well understood in mice, much less is known about the immunologic changes that occur following splenectomy in humans. We sought to characterize the circulating immune cell populations of patients before and after elective splenectomy to determine if these changes are related to postsplenectomy survival outcomes. Retrospective clinical information was collected from 95 patients undergoing elective splenectomy compared with 91 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure). We further analyzed peripheral blood from five patients in the splenectomy group, collected before and after surgery, using single-cell cytometry by time-of-flight mass spectrometry. We compared pre- and postsplenectomy data to characterize both the major and minor immune cell populations in significantly greater detail. Compared with patients undergoing a Whipple procedure, splenectomized patients had significant and long-lasting elevated counts of lymphocytes, monocytes, and basophils. Cytometry by time-of-flight mass spectroscopy analysis demonstrated that the elevated lymphocytes primarily consisted of naive CD4+ T cells and a population of activated CD25+CD56+CD4+ T cells, whereas the elevated monocyte counts were mainly mature, activated monocytes. We also observed a significant increase in the expression of the chemokine receptors CCR6 and CCR4 on several cellular populations. Taken together, these data indicate that significant immunological changes take place following splenectomy. Whereas other groups have compared splenectomized patients to healthy controls, this study compared patients undergoing elective splenectomy to those undergoing a similar major abdominal surgery. Overall, we found that splenectomy results in significant long-lasting changes in circulating immune cell populations and function.

Is incidental splenectomy during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair associated with reduced survival?

OBJECTIVE: The effect of incidental splenectomy during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair is unknown. We hypothesized incidental splenectomy was associated with decreased late survival. METHODS: We studied 1056 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs from 2006 to 2016. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years (n = 9), prior splenectomy (n = 2), and intraoperative death (n = 3). This left 1042 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs for analysis (median age, 65 years; interquartile range, 56-72), including 221 (21%) that were reoperations. Multivariable modeling identified predictors of operative mortality in the total cohort. Moreover, to adjust for baseline differences, propensity score matching was performed to examine the frequency of these outcomes in the total cohort (n = 132 pairs) and the early survivors (n = 110 pairs). Late survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk of late mortality was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Incidental splenectomy was performed in 135 patients (13%), 36% of whom underwent reoperation. Operative mortality rates of the incidental splenectomy and nonincidental splenectomy groups were 16% versus 8% in both the overall study (P = .005) and the propensity score-matched (P = .07) cohorts. In multivariable analysis, incidental splenectomy independently predicted operative mortality (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.94; P = .008). For early survivors, incidental splenectomy did not increase the risk of late mortality. Survival estimates of matched early survivors did not differ between the incidental splenectomy and nonincidental splenectomy groups (P = .29). CONCLUSIONS: Incidental splenectomy during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair was associated with increased operative mortality but not reduced late survival. Splenic preservation is encouraged when feasible.

Place for elective cholecystectomy for patients with severe thalassaemia: a retrospective case control study.

OBJECTIVE: At present, cholecystectomy is carried out for thalassaemia patients with gall stone disease only if they develop symptoms of cholecystitis, except in the rare instance where an un-inflammed gall bladder is removed simultaneously with splenectomy. We carried out this retrospective analysis of case records to examine if patients with thalassaemia have a higher rate of peri operative complications compared to non-thalassaemics with gall stone disease, warranting a change of policy to justify elective cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Case records of 540 patients with thalassaemia were retrospectively analysed of which 98 were found to have gallstones. Records of 62 patients without thalassaemia with gall stone disease too were used for comparison. 19 of patients with thalassaemia and 52 of non-thalassaemic who had gallstones had undergone cholecystectomy. In all but 5 patients with thalassaemia cholecystectomy was done following attacks of acute cholecystitis as was the case in the non-thalassaemic controls. A significantly higher proportion of early and late complications had occurred in thalassaemia patients compared to non-thalassaemic patients post operatively. Six deaths related to sepsis following acute cholecystitis in the peri operative period were reported among 19 thalassaemia patients whereas no deaths were reported among 55 non-thalassaemic patients who underwent cholecystectomy for gallstones.

In Patients with Localized and Resectable Gastric Cancer, What is the Optimal Extent of Lymph Node Dissection-D1 Versus D2 Versus D3?

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer, the debate over the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy continues. METHOD: A review of the classification, rationale for, and boundaries of lymphadenectomy is presented. A review of the available literature comparing D1 versus D2 versus D3 lymphadenectomy was performed and included randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative and non-comparative studies. RESULTS: Earlier studies demonstrated increased morbidity with D2 compared with D1 lymphadenectomy, with no significant survival benefit. More recent studies have demonstrated survival benefit of a pancreas and spleen-sparing D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced, node-positive tumors. Para-aortic/D3 dissections contribute to increased morbidity, with no survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma, a D2 lymph node dissection preserving the pancreas and spleen should be considered standard for optimal staging and treatment, provided it is performed by surgeons with sufficient expertise. Extended lymph node dissections beyond D2 should not be routinely performed as it has been shown to have increased morbidity, with no improvement in outcomes. While systemic chemotherapy should be considered standard in patients undergoing D2 lymphadenectomy, the role of adjuvant radiation continues to evolve.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Anterior Versus Lateral Approach for Laparoscopic Splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: As the experience grew with laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) more surgeons appreciate the advantages of lateral approach compared with conventional anterior approach. In view of this we aimed to compare anterior approach and lateral approach in LS. METHODS: We conducted a search of electronic information sources to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing anterior and lateral approach in patients undergoing LS. Primary outcomes included need for blood transfusion, intraoperative blood loss, and conversion to open surgery. The secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity, operative time, time to oral intake, length of hospital stay, need for reoperation, and mortality. Random or fixed-effects modeling were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. RESULTS: We identified 1 RCT and 4 retrospective observational studies, enrolling 728 patients. The baseline characteristics included populations in both groups were comparable. Anterior approach was associated with higher need for blood transfusion [odds ratio (OR), 4.83, 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.31-10.97; P=0.0001]; higher risks of intraoperative blood loss [mean difference (MD), 101.06, 95% CI, 52.05-150.06; P=0.0001], conversion to open surgery (OR, 3.33, 95% CI, -1.32 to 8.43; P=0.01), postoperative morbidity (OR, 3.86, 95% CI, -2.23 to 6.67; P=0.00001) and need for reoperation (OR, 6.91, 95% CI, -1.07 to 44.6; P=0.04); longer operative time (MD, 2.51, 95% CI, -1.43 to 3.59; P=0.00001), time to oral intake (MD, 0.60, 95% CI, -0.14 to -1.07; P=0.01), and length of stay (MD, 2.52, 95% CI, -1.43 to 3.59; P=0.00001) compared with lateral approach. There was no difference in the risk of mortality between the 2 groups (risk difference, 0.00, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.02; P=0.61). CONCLUSIONS: The best available evidence suggests that the lateral approach is superior to anterior approach in LS as indicated by better access, more secure hemostasis, less conversion to open surgery, less morbidity, earlier recovery, and shorter length of hospital stay. The quality of the available evidence is moderate; high-quality RCTs are required to provide more robust basis for definite conclusions.

The Therapeutic Survival Benefit of Splenic Hilar Nodal Dissection for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Invading the Greater Curvature.

BACKGROUND: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group phase 3 study confirmed the survival non-inferiority of spleen-preserving surgery against splenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer not invading the greater curvature. However, the efficacy of #10 lymph node (LN) dissection for tumors that involve the greater curvature remains unclear. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent D2-total gastrectomy with splenectomy between January 2000 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The study included 593 patients. The patients were split into two groups, with 212 patients in the tumor invasion of the greater curvature (Gre) group and 381 patients in the non-Gre group. Survival curves and the state of LN metastasis and the index of estimated benefit from LN dissection of each station were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of #10 LN metastasis was 8.1% (48/593): 15.1% in the Gre group and 4.2% in the non-Gre group. The 5-year overall survival rates for the patients with and without #10 metastasis were respectively 46.9 and 50.2% (P = 0.829) in the Gre group and 49.6 and 62.3% (P = 0.074) in the non-Gre group. The indices for #10 LN dissection were 7.1 in the Gre group and 2.3 in the non-Gre group. In the Gre group, the node station with the highest index was #3, followed by #4d, #1, #4sb, #4sa, #7, #2, #10 (index > 7). CONCLUSION: The splenic hilar nodes should be prioritized as a component of D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer invading the greater curvature based on its high metastatic rate and index.