Case report: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor sargramostim did not rescue the neutrophil phenotype in two patients with JAGN1-mutant severe congenital neutropenia.

Background: Homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in JAGN1 cause severe congenital neutropenia. JAGN1-mutant patients present with severe early-onset bacterial infections and most have been described as low-responders to recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy. In a murine, hematopoietic JAGN1 knockout model, which displays susceptibility to Candida albicans infection in the absence of neutropenia, treatment with granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF) was able to restore the functional defect of neutrophils. Patients: We present two unrelated patients with biallelic JAGN1 mutations, who were both treated with subcutaneous GM-CSF (sargramostim) after treatment failure to G-CSF. The first patient was an 18-year-old pregnant woman who received GM-CSF at 12 weeks of gestation up to a dose of 10 µg/kg/d for 7 days. The second patient was a 5-month-old girl who received GM-CSF for a total of 9 days at a dose of up to 20 µg/kg/d. GM-CSF did not increase neutrophil counts in our patients. Treatment was stopped when neutrophil numbers declined further, no beneficial effect was noticed, and patients presented with infections. No adverse effects were observed in either patient and the fetus. Both patients ultimately underwent successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Discussion: Both patients showed a high recurrence rate of severe infections on G-CSF treatment. GM-CSF therapy did not ameliorate the clinical phenotype, in contrast to the improvement of neutrophil function observed in the JAGN1 mouse model. No major additional extra-hematopoietic manifestations were evident in our patients. Conclusion: In two unrelated patients, GM-CSF did not have any beneficial effect on neutrophil counts. Patients with JAGN1-mutant SCN with reduced G-CSF responsiveness and elevated infection rate should be evaluated early for stem cell transplantation.

Inhaled molgramostim therapy for the treatment of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP): a plain language summary of the IMPALA trial.

What is this summary about? This is a plain language summary of a late-stage clinical trial called IMPALA, originally reported in The New England Journal of Medicine. The IMPALA trial studied a drug called molgramostim nebulizer solution (molgramostim) to see how well it worked and how safe it was in patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP). Normally, tiny air sacs (alveoli) in the lungs are covered by a thin layer of an oily substance called surfactant that helps to keep them open. In aPAP, surfactant builds up and clogs alveoli making it difficult to breathe. Inhaled molgramostim helps to reduce the amount of surfactant clogging the alveoli.What were the results of the trial? After 24 weeks of treatment, patients who received molgramostim every day had better oxygen transfer into blood than patients who received an inactive substance (placebo). Patients' sense of well-being and quality of life was improved more with daily molgramostim than placebo. The amount of surfactant in the lungs measured using scans and the number of whole-lung lavages (lung washes) patients required were lower with daily molgramostim than placebo. The number of medical problems (adverse events) was similar in patients who received molgramostim and placebo except for chest pain, which was more common with molgramostim.What do the results of the trial mean? The IMPALA trial demonstrated that molgramostim is a promising treatment option for people with aPAP.

PD-1 inhibitor combined with SBRT, GM-CSF, and thymosin alpha-1 in metastatic breast cancer: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Triple-negative breast cancer is characterized by a worse prognosis compared with other breast cancer subtypes, especially in the case of pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Because of the limited treatment options and suboptimal response rates, there is a pressing need to explore novel treatment protocols. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 48-year-old female patient diagnosed with mTNBC who had not responded to multiple lines of therapy (including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) but demonstrated significant efficacy and abscopal effects after enrolling in our clinical trial. DIAGNOSES: Triple-negative breast cancer with lung metastases. INTERVENTIONS: The clinical trial combined stereotactic body radiotherapy, immunotherapy, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and thymosin alpha-1 to treat previously treated metastatic solid cancers. OUTCOMES: This combined treatment regimen implemented in this clinical trial yielded the patient's notable efficacy, accompanied by abscopal effects. The target lesion and the 3 observed lesions achieved a partial response according to the RECIST v1.1 criteria. reevaluation scans after 2 cycles of immunotherapy indicated a regression rate of -78.97% for the target lesion and -56.73% for the observed lesions. Hematological indexes were stable, and there was no apparent myelosuppression. Also, the tumor marker CA-199 exhibited a downward trend. During the course of treatment, the patient experienced a grade 2 skin reaction, which improved after receiving antiallergic treatment. No further adverse effects were observed. LESSONS: This treatment regimen may offer a promising treatment strategy for patients with mTNBC and other metastatic solid cancers.

Sintilimab in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: The multicenter SWORD phase 2 trial.

This single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT04106180) investigated the triple combination of sintilimab (anti-PD1 antibody), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With a median follow-up of 32.1 months, 18 (36.7%, 90% CI 25.3%-49.5%) of the 49 evaluable patients had an objective response, meeting the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included out-of-field (abscopal) response rate (ASR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The ASR was 30.6% (95% CI 18.3%-45.4%). The median PFS and OS were 5.9 (95% CI 2.5-9.3) and 18.4 (95% CI 9.7-27.1) months, respectively. Any grade and grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 44 (86.3%) and 6 (11.8%) patients, without grade 4-5 TRAEs. Moreover, in pre-specified biomarker analyses, SBRT-induced increase of follicular helper T cells (Tfh) in unirradiated tumor lesions and patient's blood, as well as of circulating IL-21 levels, was found associated with improved prognosis. Taken together, the triple combination therapy was well tolerated with promising efficacy and Tfh may play a critical role in SBRT-triggered anti-tumor immunity in metastatic NSCLC.

Gemogenovatucel-T (Vigil): bi-shRNA plasmid-based targeted immunotherapy.

We describe in this review the historical evidence leading up to the concept and design of Vigil and subsequent clinical applications including safety and efficacy in a randomized, controlled Phase IIB trial. Vigil (gemogenovatucel-T) is a unique triple function targeted immunotherapy that demonstrates preclinical and clinical systemic anticancer activity. Construction of Vigil involves harvest of autologous malignant tissue for neoantigen targeting (ideally containing clonal neoantigens) followed by a two-day process involving transfection with a plasmid to provide a permissive 'training environment' for the patient's immune system. Transfected plasmid components contain an expressive human GMCSF DNA segment to enhance anticancer immune functional response and a second component expressing bi-shRNAfurin which reduces TGFß isomers (TGFß1 and TGFß2) thereby reducing cancer inhibition of the targeted immune response. Results generated to date justify advancement to confirmatory clinical trials supporting product regulatory approval.

Vigil is an anticancer treatment that employs three methods of enhancing the body's immune system to identify and kill cancer cells. The construction of Vigil involves cancer cells from the same person being treated (personalized therapy) in combination with added anticancer genetic signals to enhance the number and function anti-anticancer immune cells and to guide the immune cells to the cancer and not to normal organs of the body. In this manner, an army of immune cells are created that can move to attacking the cancer using blood vessels to get to the cancer anywhere it tries to grow in the body. One study (Phase I) performed with this product to determine safety and dose range demonstrated an optimal dose and schedule. Another study (Phase IIA) showed initial clinical benefit. A third more complex study (Phase IIB) in patients treated with Vigil compared with standard of care without Vigil demonstrated the ability to prolong the patients life and time without their cancer getting worse without any significant side effects associated with the treatment in a unique subset of ovarian cancer patients, those with the ability to repair their DNA. Based on the composite of these results, Vigil is an attractive targeted immunotherapy justified for late-stage clinical testing.

Vaccination with folate receptor-alpha peptides in patients with ovarian cancer following response to platinum-based therapy: A randomized, multicenter clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is overexpressed on >90% of high-grade epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC). Targeting FRα with antibody-drug conjugates has proven utility in the platinum-resistant setting. It is also a potential therapeutic target for immuno-oncologic agents, such as peptide vaccines that work primarily via adaptive and humoral immunity. We tested the hypothesis that FRα peptide immunization could improve outcomes in patients with EOC following response to platinum-based therapy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TPIV200 (a multi-epitope FRα peptide vaccine admixed with GM-CSF) versus GM-CSF alone in 120 women who did not have disease progression after at least 4 cycles of first-line platinum-based therapy. Patients were vaccinated intradermally once every 4 weeks up to 6 times, followed by a boosting period of 6 vaccinations at 12-week intervals. Primary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: At study termination with a median follow-up of 15.2 months (range 1.2-28.4 months), 68 of 119 intention-to-treat patients had disease progression (55% in TPIV200 + GM-CSF arm and 59% in GM-CSF alone arm). The median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI 8.3-16.6 months) with no significant difference between the treatment groups (10.9 months with TPIV200 + GM-CSF versus 11.1 months with GM-CSF, HR, 0.85; upper 90% CI 1.17]. No patient experienced a ≥ grade 3 drug-related adverse event. CONCLUSION: TPIV200 was well tolerated but was not associated with improved PFS. Additional studies are required to uncover potential synergies using multiepitope vaccines targeting FRα. Trial Registration NLM/NCBI Registry, NCT02978222, https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT02978222.

A First-in-Human Phase I Clinical Study with MVX-ONCO-1, a Personalized Active Immunotherapy, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Over two decades, most cancer vaccines failed clinical development. Key factors may be the lack of efficient priming with tumor-specific antigens and strong immunostimulatory signals. MVX-ONCO-1, a personalized cell-based cancer immunotherapy, addresses these critical steps utilizing clinical-grade material to replicate a successful combination seen in experimental models: inactivated patient's own tumor cells, providing the widest cancer-specific antigen repertoire and a standardized, sustained, local delivery over days of a potent adjuvant achieved by encapsulated cell technology. We conducted an open-label, single-arm, first-in-human phase I study with MVX-ONCO-1 in patients with advanced refractory solid cancer. MVX-ONCO-1 comprises irradiated autologous tumor cells coimplanted with two macrocapsules containing genetically engineered cells producing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Patients received six immunizations over 9 weeks without maintenance therapy. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and feasibility, whereas secondary objectives focused on efficacy and immune monitoring. Data from 34 patients demonstrated safety and feasibility with minor issues. Adverse events included one serious adverse event possibly related to investigational medicinal product and two moderate-related adverse events. More than 50% of the patients with advanced and mainly nonimmunogenic tumors showed clinical benefits, including partial responses, stable diseases, and prolonged survival. In recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, one patient achieved a partial response, whereas another survived for more than 7 years without anticancer therapy for over 5 years. MVX-ONCO-1 is safe, well tolerated, and beneficial across several tumor types. Ongoing phase IIa trials target patients with advanced recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after initial systemic therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: This first-in-human phase I study introduces a groundbreaking approach to personalized cancer immunotherapy, addressing limitations of traditional strategies. By combining autologous irradiated tumor cells as a source of patient-specific antigens and utilizing encapsulated cell technology for localized, sustained delivery of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as an adjuvant, the study shows a very good safety and feasibility profile. This innovative approach holds the promise of addressing tumor heterogeneity by taking advantage of each patient's antigenic repertoire.

Whole lung lavage and GM-CSF use for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in an infant with lysinuric protein intolerance: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Lysinuric protein intolerance (LPI) is a multi-organ metabolic disorder characterized by the imbalance in absorption and excretion of cationic amino acids like lysine, ornithine and arginine. Infants with LPI typically present with recurrent vomiting, poor growth, interstitial lung disease or renal impairment. The early onset of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) has been reported to be associated with a severe form of LPI. Treatment of PAP most commonly consists of whole-lung lavage (WLL) and in autoimmune PAP, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administration. Nevertheless, GM-CSF therapy in LPI-associated PAP has not been scientifically justified. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of an 8-month-old infant presenting with respiratory failure due to LPI associated with PAP, who was twice treated with WLL; firstly, while on veno-venous ECMO assistance and then by the use of a selective bronchial blocker. After the two treatments with WLL, she was weaned from daytime respiratory support while on initially subcutaneous, then on inhaled GM-CSF therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This case supports the notion that GM-CSF therapy might be of benefit in patients with LPI-associated PAP. Further studies are needed to clarify the exact mechanism of GM-CSF in patients with LPI-associated PAP.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor neutralisation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in the UK (NAMASTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a proinflammatory cytokine overproduced in several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, including axial spondyloarthritis. Namilumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal anti-GM-CSF antibody that potently neutralises human GM-CSF. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab in participants with moderate-to-severe active axial spondyloarthritis. METHODS: This proof-of-concept, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2, Bayesian (NAMASTE) trial was done at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants aged 18-75 years with axial spondyloarthritis, meeting the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria and the ASAS-defined MRI criteria, with active disease as defined by a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), were eligible. Those who had inadequately responded or had intolerance to previous treatment with an anti-TNF agent were included. Participants were randomly assigned (6:1) to receive subcutaneous namilumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 10. Participants, site staff (except pharmacy staff), and central study staff were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who had an ASAS ≥20% improvement (ASAS20) clinical response at week 12 in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03622658). FINDINGS: From Sept 6, 2018, to July 25, 2019, 60 patients with moderate-to-severe active axial spondyloarthritis were assessed for eligibility and 42 were randomly assigned to receive namilumab (n=36) or placebo (n=six). The mean age of participants was 39·5 years (SD 13·3), 17 were women, 25 were men, 39 were White, and seven had previously received anti-TNF therapy. The primary endpoint was not met. At week 12, the proportion of patients who had an ASAS20 clinical response was lower in the namilumab group (14 of 36) than in the placebo group (three of six; estimated between-group difference 6·8%). The Bayesian posterior probability η was 0·72 (>0·927 suggests high clinical significance). The rates of any treatment-emergent adverse events in the namilumab group were similar to those in the placebo group (31 vs five). INTERPRETATION: Namilumab did not show efficacy compared with placebo in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis, but the treatment was generally well tolerated. FUNDING: Izana Bioscience, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), NIHR Birmingham BRC, and Clinical Research Facility.

Combination treatment with anti-HER2 therapeutic antibody RC48, PD-1 inhibitor, radiotherapy, and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patient with metastatic gastric cancer: a case report.

HER2 overexpression/amplification is a prevalent driver in various types of cancer, including gastric cancer (GC). Limited options are available for patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer, particularly those who do not respond to the standard therapy of HER2 antibody trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy. Previous research suggests that combining a PD-1 inhibitor with radiotherapy and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (PRaG regimen) may enhance the antitumor effects in patients with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic solid tumors. In this case study, we presented a potential treatment strategy of a patient having HER2-positive and PD-L1-negative gastric adenocarcinoma. The patient showed rapid tumor progression even after surgery and multiple trastuzumab plus chemotherapy treatments. To address this, we employed a novel anti-HER2 antibody called RC48 in combination with PRaG regimen therapy (PRaG3.0). The patient demonstrated a positive response after two treatment cycles and achieved a progression-free survival time of 6.5 months. This case highlights the potential of four-combination therapies for treating refractory, multiorgan, HER2-positive, PD-L1-negative metastatic gastric cancer. Additionally, varying radiation doses in targeting dual foci is critical to enhance tumor immunotherapy.

IGF-1R mediates crosstalk between nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and osteoclasts and promotes tumor bone metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) poses a significant health burden in specific regions of Asia, and some of NPC patients have bone metastases at the time of initial diagnosis. Bone metastasis can cause pathologic fractures and pain, reducing patients' quality of life, and is associated with worse survival. This study aims to unravel the complex role of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) in NPC bone metastasis, offering insights into potential therapeutic targets. METHODS: We assessed IGF-1R expression in NPC cells and explored its correlation with bone metastasis. Experiments investigated the impact of osteoclast-secreted IGF-1 on the IGF-1R/AKT/S6 pathway in promoting NPC cell proliferation within the bone marrow. Additionally, the reciprocal influence of tumor-secreted Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption was examined. The effects of IGF-1 neutralizing antibody, IGF-1R specific inhibitor (NVP-AEW541) and mTORC inhibitor (rapamycin) on nasopharyngeal carcinoma bone metastasis were also explored in animal experiments. RESULTS: Elevated IGF-1R expression in NPC cells correlated with an increased tendency for bone metastasis. IGF-1, secreted by osteoclasts, activated the IGF-1R/AKT/S6 pathway, promoting NPC cell proliferation in the bone marrow. Tumor-secreted GM-CSF further stimulated osteoclast differentiation, exacerbating bone resorption. The IGF-1 neutralizing antibody, NVP-AEW541 and rapamycin were respectively effective in slowing down the rate of bone metastasis and reducing bone destruction. CONCLUSION: The intricate interplay among IGF-1R, IGF-1, and GM-CSF highlights potential therapeutic targets for precise control of NPC bone metastasis, providing valuable insights for developing targeted interventions.

Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: From Graft-versus-Host Disease to the Graft-versus-Tumor Effect.

Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a widely used treatment for a broad range of hematologic malignancies because of its graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect. Unfortunately, allo-HSCT is still associated with morbidity and mortality related to relapse and transplantation complications, namely graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). In an era of therapies specifically targeting molecular pathways, transcription factors, and cytokines, a better understanding of GVHD physiopathology is essential for the development of new therapeutic approaches. In this review, we outline the current knowledge of the role of granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in allo-HSCT. We first discuss the biology of GM-CSF and its signaling pathways, with a focus on the main producing cells, T cells. We discuss recent preclinical studies pointing to a pivotal role of GM-CSF in GVHD, in particular gastrointestinal GVHD. We then summarize the potential role of GM-CSF in the GVT effect, discussing some potential strategies for exploiting GM-CSF in the context of allo-HSCT.

Ten-year experience of whole lung lavage in pediatric Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis (PAP) is extremely rare and can be caused by hereditary dysfunction of the granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (GM-CSF) receptor, autoantibodies against GM-CSF, or other diseases leading to alveolar macrophage (AM) dysfunction. This leads to protein accumulation in the lung and severe dyspnea and hypoxemia. Whole lung lavage (WLL) is the first line treatment strategy. METHODS: Here, we present data from more than ten years of WLL practice in pediatric PAP. WLL performed by the use of a single lumen or double lumen tube (SLT vs. DLT) were compared for technical features, procedure time, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of n=57 procedures in six PAP patients between 3.5 and 14.3 years of age were performed. SLT based WLL in smaller children was associated with comparable rates of adverse events but with longer intervention times and postprocedural intensive care treatment when compared to DLT based procedures. DISCUSSION: Our data shows that WLL is feasible even in small children. DLT based WLL seems to be more effective, and our data supports the notion that it should be considered as early as possible in pediatric PAP. CONCLUSION: WLL lavage is possible in small PAP patients but should performed in close interdisciplinary cooperation and with age appropriate protocols.

OPTIMA: An Open-Label, Noncomparative Pilot Trial of Inhaled Molgramostim in Pulmonary Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infection.

Rationale: Inhaled granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been proposed as a potential immunomodulatory treatment for nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infection.Objectives: This open-label, noncomparative pilot trial investigated the efficacy and safety of inhaled GM-CSF (molgramostim nebulizer solution) in patients with predominantly treatment-refractory pulmonary NTM infection (Mycobacterium avium complex [MAC] and M. abscessus [MABS]), either in combination with ongoing guideline-based therapy (GBT) or as monotherapy in patients who had stopped GBT because of lack of efficacy or intolerability.Methods: Thirty-two adult patients with refractory NTM infection (MAC, n = 24; MABS, n = 8) were recruited into two cohorts: those with (n = 16) and without (n = 16) ongoing GBT. Nebulized molgramostim 300 µg/d was administered over 48 weeks. Sputum cultures and smears and clinical assessments (6-min-walk distance, symptom scores, Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Questionnaire score, and body weight) were collected every 4 weeks during treatment and 12 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was sputum culture conversion, defined as three consecutive monthly negative cultures during the treatment period.Results: Eight patients (25%) achieved culture conversion on treatment (seven [29.2%] patients with MAC infection, one [12.5%] patient with MABS infection); in four patients, this was durable after the end of treatment. Of the 24 patients with MAC infection, an additional 4 patients had a partial response, converting from smear positive at baseline to smear negative at the end of treatment, and time to positivity in liquid culture media increased. Two of these patients sustained negative cultures from the end of treatment. Other clinical endpoints were unchanged. Serious adverse events were mainly pulmonary exacerbations or worsening NTM infection. Three deaths, not treatment related, were reported.Conclusions: In this population of patients with severe NTM disease, molgramostim was safe and well tolerated. Sputum culture conversion rates for patients with MAC infection (29.2%) were greater than reported for similar refractory MAC cohorts managed with GBT alone. Less benefit was seen for MABS infection. No serious safety concerns were identified. Further evaluation in a larger cohort is warranted.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03421743).

Plasma cytokine and growth factor response to acute psychosocial stress in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α are elevated in response to psychosocial stress; however, less is known about other inflammatory markers. METHODS: We explored response to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) of 16 cytokines and growth factors in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD, n = 12) vs. healthy volunteers (HV, n = 16). Outcomes were baseline and post-stress levels estimated by area under the curve (AUCi) and peak change over 3 timepoints. We also explored correlations between biomarkers and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Baseline concentrations were higher in MDD for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AB/BB (p = 0.037, d = 0.70), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, p = 0.033, d = 0.52), and IL-8 (p = 0.046, d = 0.74). After TSST, AUCi was higher in MDD for GM-CSF (p = 0.003, d = 1.21), IL-5 (p = 0.014, d = 1.62), and IL-27 (p = 0.041, d = 0.74). In MDD, depression severity correlated positively with soluble CD40L (sCD40L) for AUCi (Spearman's ρ = 0.76, p = 0.004) and with baseline vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA, r = 0.85, p < 0.001), but negatively with baseline monokine induced by gamma interferon (MIG, aka CXCL9; r = -0.77, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Effect sizes were robust in this exploratory study, although interpretation of the results must be cautious, given small sample size and multiple comparisons. Differential study of stress-induced biomarkers may have important ramifications for MDD treatment.

GM-CSF, G-CSF or no cytokine therapy with anti-GD2 immunotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma.

Colony-stimulating factors have been shown to improve anti-disialoganglioside 2 (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibody response in high-risk neuroblastoma by enhancing antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). A substantial amount of research has focused on recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an adjuvant to anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies. There may be a disparity in care among patients as access to GM-CSF therapy and anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies is not uniform. Only select countries have approved these agents for use, and even with regulatory approvals, access to these agents can be complex and cost prohibitive. This comprehensive review summarizes clinical data regarding efficacy and safety of GM-CSF, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or no cytokine in combination with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (ie, dinutuximab, dinutuximab beta or naxitamab) for immunotherapy of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. A substantial body of clinical data support the immunotherapy combination of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies and GM-CSF. In contrast, clinical data supporting the use of G-CSF are limited. No formal comparison between GM-CSF, G-CSF and no cytokine has been identified. The treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with anti-GD2 therapy plus GM-CSF is well established. Suboptimal efficacy outcomes with G-CSF raise concerns about its suitability as an alternative to GM-CSF as an adjuvant in immunotherapy for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. While programs exist to facilitate obtaining GM-CSF and anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies in regions where they are not commercially available, continued work is needed to ensure equitable therapeutic options are available globally.

The efficacy and safety assessment of oncolytic virotherapies in the treatment of advanced melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of oncolytic virotherapies in the treatment of advanced melanoma still remains controversal. It is necessary to conduct quantitative evaluation on the basis of preclinical trial reports. METHODS: Publicly available databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library.) and register (Clinicaltrials.gov) were searched to collect treatment outcomes of oncolytic virotherapies (including herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV), coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21), adenovirus, poxvirus and reovirus) for advanced/unresectable melanoma. Comparisons of treatment response, adverse events (AEs) and survival analyses for different virotherapies were performed by R software based on the extracted data from eligible studies. RESULTS: Finally, thirty-four eligible studies were analysed and HSV virotherapy had the highest average complete response (CR, 24.8%) and HSV had a slightly higher average overall response rate (ORR) than CVA21 (43.8% vs 42.6%). In the pooled results of comparing talimogene laherparepve (T-VEC) with or without GM-CSF/ICIs (immune checkpoint inhibitors) to GM-CSF/ICIs monotherapy suggested virotherapy was more efficient in subgroups CR (RR = 1.80, 95% CI [1.30; 2.51], P < 0.01), ORR (RR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.02; 1.34], P < 0.05), and DCR (RR = 1.27, 95% CI [1.15; 1.40], P < 0.01). In patients treated with T-VEC+ICIs, 2-year overall survival (12.1 ± 6.9 months) and progression-free survival (9.9 ± 6.9) were significantly longer than those treated with T-VEC alone. Furthermore, we found that AEs occurred frequently in virotherapy but decreased in a large cohort of enrolled patients, some of which, such as abdominal distension/pain, injection site pain and pruritus, were found to be positively associated with disease progression in patients treated with T-VEC monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Given the relative safety and tolerability of oncolytic viruses, and the lack of reports of dose-limiting-dependent toxicities, more patients treated with T-VEC with or without ICIs should be added to future assessment analyses. There is still a long way to go before it can be used as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced or unresectable melanoma.

Evidence for an association of serum microanalytes and myofascial pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) is a common pain disorder. Diagnostic criteria include physical findings which are often unreliable or not universally accepted. A precise biosignature may improve diagnosis and treatment effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to assess whether microanalytic assays significantly correlate with characteristic clinical findings in people with MPS. METHODS: This descriptive, prospective study included 38 participants (25 women) with greater than 3 months of myofascial pain in the upper trapezius. Assessments were performed at a university laboratory. The main outcome measures were the Beighton Index, shoulder range of motion, strength asymmetries and microanalytes: DHEA, Kynurenine, VEGF, interleukins (IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-7, IL-8, IL-13), growth factors (IGF-1, IGF2, G-CSF, GM-CSF), MCP-1, MIP-1b, BDNF, Dopamine, Noradrenaline, NPY, and Acetylcholine. Mann-Whitney test and Spearman's multivariate correlation were applied for all variables. The Spearman's analysis results were used to generate a standard correlation matrix and heat map matrix. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 32 years (20-61). Eight (21%) had widespread pain (Widespread Pain Index ≥ 7). Thirteen (34%) had MPS for 1-3 years, 14 (37%) 3-10 years, and 11 (29%) for > 10 years. The following showed strong correlations: IL1b,2,4,5,7,8; GM-CSF and IL 2,4,5,7; between DHEA and BDNF and between BDNF and Kynurenine, NPY and acetylcholine. The heat map analysis demonstrated strong correlations between the Beighton Index and IL 5,7, GM-CSF, DHEA. Asymmetries of shoulder and cervical spine motion and strength associated with select microanalytes. CONCLUSION: Cytokine levels significantly correlate with selected clinical assessments. This indirectly suggests possible biological relevance for understanding MPS. Correlations among some cytokine clusters; and DHEA, BDNF kynurenine, NPY, and acetylcholine may act together in MPS. These findings should be further investigated for confirmation that link these microanalytes with select clinical findings in people with MPS.