Game changer: How Janus kinase inhibitors are reshaping the landscape of ulcerative colitis management.

Recent advancements in the treatment landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC) have ushered in a new era of possibilities, particularly with the introduction of Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription inhibitors. These novel agents offer a paradigm shift in UC management by targeting key signaling pathways involved in inflammatory processes. With approved JAK inhibitors (JAKis), such as tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, clinicians now have powerful tools to modulate immune responses and gene expression, potentially revolutionizing the treatment algorithm for UC. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of JAKis in inducing and maintaining remission, presenting viable options for patients who have failed conventional therapies. Real-world data support the use of JAKis not only as first-line treatments but also in subsequent lines of therapy, particularly in patients with aggressive disease phenotypes or refractory to biologic agents. The rapid onset of action and potency of JAKis have broadened the possibilities in the management strategies of UC, offering timely relief for patients with active disease and facilitating personalized treatment approaches. Despite safety concerns, including cardiovascular risks and infections, ongoing research and post-marketing surveillance will continue to refine our understanding of the risk-benefit profile of JAKis in UC management.

Normalized Interferon Signatures and Clinical Improvements by IFNAR1 Blocking Antibody (Anifrolumab) in Patients with Type I Interferonopathies.

PURPOSE: A causal role of type-I interferons (IFN-I) in autoinflammatory type-I interferonopathies such as SAVI (STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy) and CANDLE (chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperatures) is suggested by elevated expression of IFN-I stimulated genes (ISGs). Hitherto, the lack of specific inhibitors of IFN-I signaling has prevented the verification of a causal role for IFN-I in these conditions. Commonly used inhibitors of the JAK/STAT pathway exert broad effects on multiple signaling pathways leading to more general immunosuppression beyond IFN-I signaling. METHODS: Here we show in four patients with SAVI and one patient with CANDLE syndrome that blockade of the IFNAR1 receptor (Anifrolumab) exerts an additive effect over JAK-inhibitor alone. In two patients with SAVI, monotherapy with Anifrolumab is sufficient to retain a suppressed IFN-I signature and clinical improvement. RESULTS: Anifrolumab normalizes IFN-I signature genes and relieves symptoms beyond what is typically achieved by a JAK-inhibitor (Baricitinib) alone in patients with type-I interferonopathies. In two patients Anifrolumab was used successfully as monotherapy. Addition of Anifrolumab enabled steroid tapering and cessation with reduced overall immunosuppression and lower risks of opportunistic infections and improved metabolic states and growth which is highly beneficial in these young patients. CONCLUSION: These results verify a causal role of IFN-I signaling in type-I Interferonopathies SAVI and CANDLE and suggests Anifrolumab as an important new treatment option in autoinflammatory diseases with elevated IFN-I induced gene expression. Genia Kretzschmar, Laura Piñero Páez, and Ziyang Tan are shared-first authors. Sara Alehashemi, AnnaCarin Horne, and Petter Brodin are co-senior author.

Interpreting modern randomized controlled trials of medical therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

Treatment options for the medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded substantially over the past decade. Multiple classes of advanced therapies, including both monoclonal antibodies and novel oral small molecules, are now available for the treatment of moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, highlighted by the approvals of the first IL23p19 antagonists, selective Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. These advances have been accompanied by the identification of novel targets and the rapid growth in both the number and size of IBD clinical trials. Over a dozen landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been completed in the past 5 years, including the first head-to-head biologic trials, the first combination biologic studies, and multiple phase III registrational trials of novel compounds with new co-primary and composite end points that will change the treatment landscape for years to come. Importantly, the methodology of RCTs in IBD has evolved substantially, with new trial designs, evaluation of unique patient populations, and different types of efficacy and safety end points being key innovations. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of how modern RCTs of IBD medical therapies have evolved and the implications for their appraisal that will help guide the application of these data to clinical practice.

Tofacitinib for child-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can cause diverse clinical manifestations in multiple organ systems. Child-onset SLE (cSLE) is associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality than adult-onset SLE. The traditional treatments for SLE (glucocorticoids, antimalarials, conventional and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) often have significant adverse effects and may not fully control disease activity. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that inhibits the JAK-STAT pathway and has the potential to reduce SLE severity. Methods: cSLE patients who received tofacitinib and had at least one follow-up visit were retrospectively examined. Case histories, laboratory test results, and treatment regimens were analyzed at disease onset, initiation of tofacitinib treatment, and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after starting tofacitinib. Results: We examined 9 patients with refractory cSLE. All patients were female and the average age at diagnosis was 10.67 years. At initiation of tofacitinib, the average age was 13.28 years and the average disease duration was 2.62 years. Four patients experienced alleviation of symptoms and reduced their daily prednisone dosages; one of them also discontinued cyclosporine A and two of them also discontinued belimumab. The other 5 patients experienced no apparent benefit. Conclusion: Tofacitinib may provide clinical benefits for some patients with refractory cSLE, and can also allow reduction in the glucocorticoid dosage. Tofacitinib has the potential as an adjunctive treatment for some patients with cSLE.

The ABCs of JAKis: A Clinician's Guide to Safety and Monitoring of the Systemic JAK Inhibitors.

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have recently emerged in the arsenal of tools to treat dermatological conditions. However, there are some concerns regarding these treatments due to their boxed warning. Here we discuss the safe and effective use of JAKs for the treatment of a wide variety of dermatologic conditions. We will also discuss monitoring guidelines. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(10):852-856. doi:10.36849/JDD.8073.

Treatment with oclacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, down-regulates and up-regulates CD25 and Foxp3 expression, respectively, in peripheral blood T cells of dogs with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Oclacitinib (OCL), a Janus kinase inhibitor, is a novel immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive agent which is an approved as the first-line treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) in dogs. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of OCL on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and their selected subsets under clinical conditions, i.e. in dogs suffering from AD, in terms of both safety and immune mechanisms underlying its therapeutic actions. Eight dogs were treated for 28 days with OCL at the recommended dose. Blood samples were taken at day 0, 7, 14 and 28. RESULTS: The study showed that the mean percentage and absolute count of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells on the 14th and 28th day of the treatment with OCL did not differ from the corresponding baseline values, i.e. those before the treatment. On the 7th day of the treatment, the mean absolute count of CD4+ T cells and the mean percentage and absolute count of CD8+ T cells were significantly increased. The research found that on the 14th day of the treatment, the mean percentage and absolute count of CD25+CD4+ and CD25+CD8+ T cells were significantly decreased; the reduction in the percentage of CD25+CD4+ T cells persisted on 28th day of the treatment. A two-week treatment with OCL resulted in an increase in the mean percentage of Foxp3+CD4+ T cells, and this effect was sustained at the last time point. The treatment with OCL decreased the eosinophil level but does not affect the absolute counts of basophils, monocytes and neutrophils. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study strongly suggest that: (a) in terms of the impact of OCL on the number of PB CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, monthly treatment with the drug should be considered as a relatively safe; (b) the eosinophil-reducing effect and the down-regulation of the AD up-regulated CD25 expression on CD4+ Teff cells may constitute significant elements of the mechanism of action underlying the therapeutic effects of the drug in the treatment of canine AD; (c) the generation of inducible Foxp3-expressing CD4+ regulatory T cells - resulting in the shift of the CD4+ Treg cell (i.e. Foxp3+CD4+)/activated Teff (i.e. CD25+CD4+) cell balance toward an increased proportion of Treg cells - may be considered as additional mechanism involved in producing the immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive properties of OCL.

Multicenter observational study on the efficacy of selective Janus Kinase-1 inhibitor upatacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective, reversible Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) approved for the treatment of RA. However, there is still no solid evidence on the long-term efficacy of UPA in treated patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of UPA to obtain remission or low disease activity (LDA) in a series of UPA patients in patients with RA after 6 and 12 months of treatment in a real-world setting. METHODS: A series of 111 consecutive patients treated with UPA in 23 rheumatology centers were enrolled. Personal history, treatment history and disease activity at baseline, after 6 and 12 months were recorded. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses assessed achievement of remission or LDA or defined as DAS28 <2.6 and ≤3.2, respectively. Logistic regression analysis examined the role of several independent factors on the reduction of disease activity after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Of the initial group of 111 subjects at baseline, 86 and 29 participants completed clinical assessments at 6 and 12 months. According to ITT analysis, the rates of remission and LDA were 18% and 18% at 6 months and 31.5% and 12.5% at 12 months, respectively. PP analysis showed higher rates of remission and LDA at 6 (23.3% and 19.8%) and 12 months (55.2% and 20.7%). Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that a low DAS28 score (P=0.045) was the only predictor of achieving remission at 6 months. None of the baseline factors predicted remission/LDA at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients treated with UPA achieved a significant rate of disease remission or LDA in a real-world setting. The 6-month response was found to depend only on the baseline value of DAS28, while it was not influenced by other factors such as disease duration, line of treatment or concomitant therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or corticosteroids.

Biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs improve body composition in rheumatoid arthritis patients more than conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: Results from the PRESENT study.

INTRODUCTION: The effects of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on body composition and muscle function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients requiring treatment enhancement were compared. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study (PRESENT Study) divided RA patients non-randomly into a csDMARD group (n = 100) and a b/tsDMARD group (n = 100). Changes in body composition and muscle function were examined in 80 patients in each group followed for 52 weeks. The percentages of new-onset and improved sarcopenia over 1 year were investigated. Patients in the b/tsDMARD group were divided into three groups by drug type: TNF inhibitors (n = 30), non-TNF inhibitors (n = 23), and JAK inhibitors (n = 27). RESULTS: Baseline median age and disease duration were 70.0 and 4.0 years, respectively. Changes in weight (24 and 52 weeks) and muscle mass (52 weeks) were significantly higher in the b/tsDMARD group (p = .035, p < .001, and p = .002, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, b/tsDMARD treatment (OR 3.21, p = .002), DAS28-ESR (OR 0.65 p = .011), and muscle mass (OR 0.90, p = .023) were independently associated with increased muscle mass at 52 weeks. The percentages of new-onset and improved sarcopenia were almost equal. There were no significant differences in the time-dependent changes (52 weeks) of clinical status, body composition, muscle function, and status of sarcopenia among TNF inhibitors, non-TNF inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Weight and muscle mass increased significantly more with b/tsDMARD than with csDMARD treatment. There were no differences in body composition changes by mode of action with b/tsDMARDs.

Review article: Novel therapies in inflammatory bowel disease - An update for clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Several new treatments including small molecules and biologics have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases in recent years. Clinicians and patients now have a wide variety of therapeutic options to choose from and these novel therapies provide several advantages including oral administration, lower immunogenicity, better selectivity and arguably better safety profiles. An increase in treatment options has increased the complexity of decision-making. Both patients and clinicians have had to become rapidly familiar with efficacy of new medications balanced against a range of pre-initiation requirements, dosing schedules and adverse event profiles. AIMS: To provide a simple guide to practising clinicians on recently approved and emerging therapies and address key challenges around treatment strategies such as optimal sequencing and timing of treatment. METHODS: We comprehensively searched the published literature and major conference abstracts to identify phase III placebo-controlled and active comparator trials for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. RESULTS: Data for recently approved therapies including selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1 receptor modulators and p19 interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors have demonstrated improved patient outcomes in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Further comparative head-to-head studies have improved our understanding of when and how to optimally use newer therapies, specifically for IL-23 inhibitors. Data for emerging treatment options and novel treatment strategies such as early effective treatment, combinations of treatments and implications for sequencing are continuing to transform IBD care continually. CONCLUSIONS: Recently approved novel therapies have expanded the range of medical options available to treat IBD. However, further data from long-term extension studies, real-world studies and head-to-head trials are warranted to better inform the long-term safety and optimal sequencing of treatments for patients living with IBD.

Real-world clinical efficacy of tofacitinib in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

Tofacitinib is an oral small-molecule Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that preferentially inhibits JAK1 and JAK3. Its efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) as well as its safety profile has been demonstrated in multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Additionally, real-world studies evaluating the effectiveness and adverse effects of tofacitinib have been conducted, affirming its clinical efficacy in moderate-to-severe UC.

JAK inhibitors in systemic lupus erythematosus: Translating pathogenesis into therapy.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex multi-organ autoimmune disease marked by the production of autoantibodies against nuclear structures, formation of immune complexes, and chronic inflammation triggered by their tissular deposition. SLE is characterized by alternating periods of relapse and remission and each flare has the potential to cause new organ damage related to either the disease process or the medication toxicity. Despite remarkable progress across its multiple domains, SLE is still an area with many unmet needs, calling for innovative and practical solutions. The efforts of the drug development programme in lupus have led to considerable growth in the last decade, owing to the approval of belimumab, anifrolumab, and voclosporin. The increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease has enabled the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies. New discoveries in the intricate cytokine kaleidoscope of lupus have made the concept of targeted therapy an attractive and promising research focus. JAK inhibitors are oral targeted therapies approved for a wide variety of diseases across the Rheumatology, Gastroenterology, Dermatology, and Haematology fields. Multiple JAKis are currently being investigated in SLE. This paper aims to summarize existing data coming from both clinical trials and case reports regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in SLE.

Th1 and Th2 cytokine expression in hyperkeratotic chronic hand eczema and the role of Tofacitinib a oral JAK inhibitor.

Tissue cytokines in chronic hand eczema (CHE) can predict targeted therapy with novel drugs including JAK inhibitors. Our primary objective was to assess the tissue expression of cytokines of Th1 and Th2 cell lines in CHE patients and to study the efficacy of oral tofacitinib. We recruited patients presenting with recalcitrant CHE. Lesional and non-lesional tissue samples were assessed for Th1(IFN-γ, TNF-α) and Th2 related cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL-2,) using real time PCR. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily was initiated with 4 weekly assessment and we also noted relapses post therapy.Of 21 refractory hyperkeratotic CHE patients, cytokine analysis was performed in 11 patients which showed upregulation of IL-4 [n = 5/11, 1.87-fold increase], TNF-α (n = 5/11, 5.13-fold) and IFN-γ (n = 6/11, 1.98-fold) as compared to uninvolved skin. All patients (100%) had used topical corticosteroids (TCS) and 4/21 (19%) had failed methotrexate and 2/21 (9.5%) had failed acitretin. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily was given in 15/21 patients. The mean time to achieve hand eczema severity index 90 (HECSI 90) was 4 weeks (mean duration of treatment:5.8 months, n = 12). Side effects were observed in 4/12 (33.3%) patients and relapse was noted in 3/12 (25%) patients after a mean duration of 7 months after discontinuation of tofacitinib. Tofacitinib (pan-JAK inhibitor) showed an excellent response in refractory CHE patients with predominant tissue Th1/Th2 cells related cytokine expression.

Nonclinical evaluations of deucravacitinib and Janus kinase inhibitors in homeostatic and inflammatory pathways.

Translational medicine provides insight into novel drugs and predicts unwanted effects. In well-characterized pathways (e.g., cytokine-Janus kinase [JAK]-signal transducers and activators of transcription [STAT]), a variety of in vitro assessments were used to estimate selectivity of effects on different potential targets (i.e., JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2 [TYK2]). Several approved drugs were characterized as selective for the JAK family. These assessments are challenged by a lack of compounds that only inhibit one JAK family member. Deucravacitinib is a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric inhibitor of TYK2, a kinase required for IL-12, IL-23, and Type I interferon signaling. Unlike deucravacitinib, which selectively binds to the TYK2 regulatory domain, JAK1,2,3 inhibitors target the catalytic domain, contributing to nonselective targeting of JAK1,2,3. Cytokines associated with JAK1,2,3 signaling are required for both immune and nonimmune functions. A similar laboratory abnormality profile was observed in clinical trials using JAK1,2,3 inhibitors that has not been observed with deucravacitinib. In vitro testing of JAK1,2,3 inhibitors has relied upon assays of signal transduction, such as those measuring STAT phosphorylation, for estimates of potency and selectivity. These assay systems can be effective in estimating in vivo efficacy; however, they may not provide insight into downstream outcomes of receptor signaling, which may be more relevant for evaluating safety aspects. Assay systems assessing functional outcomes from cells may yield a more useful translational evaluation. Here, deucravacitinib was assessed for potency and selectivity versus three representatives of the JAK inhibitor class (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) based on functional assays. JAK inhibitors had suppressive activity against JAK2-dependent hematopoietic colony-forming assays modeling thrombopoiesis, erythropoiesis, and myelopoiesis; however, deucravacitinib did not. Deucravacitinib had limited potency against NK cells, cytotoxic T cells, T-helper cells, and regulatory T cells activated by JAK1/JAK3-dependent common gamma chain cytokines. These data are consistent with the biologic role of JAK1,2,3 and pharmacodynamic changes in clinical laboratory abnormalities. Against TYK2-dependent cytokines, deucravacitinib selectively inhibited Type I interferon stimulation of monocytes and dendritic cells and was a more potent inhibitor than JAK inhibitors. IL-12 and IL-23 functional outputs were similarly potently inhibited by deucravacitinib. Results are consistent with deucravacitinib selectively inhibiting TYK2.

Humans are unreliable models of mouse disease.

In defying conventional views that dismissed itch as trivial, I persisted in studying basophils and ILC2s in human skin and atopic dermatitis. My research on JAK inhibitors for itch ultimately led to FDA-approved drugs. This is my story of disregarding categories and definitions-a story about an unconventional path in science that emphasizes innovation over conformity.

[JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis: ruxolitinib and momelotinib].

Myelofibrosis should be diagnosed according to the WHO classification (2022, 5th Ed.) and International Consensus Conference 2022 criteria. Testing for driver mutations in the three genes JAK2, CALR, and MPL is recommended to ensure a definitive diagnosis. Ruxolitinib is the only JAK inhibitor currently approved in Japan, but momelotinib is under regulatory review. The MOMENTUM study showed similar spleen volume reduction at 24 weeks and MFSAF-TSS reduction as the COMFORT study of ruxolitinib. Momelotinib acts on ACVR1 and, therefore, improves anemia through suppression of hepcidin. Anemia and/or transfusion dependency are known to be associated with overall survival duration. Consequently, supportive care measures such as ESA and danazol in lieu of transfusion should be considered in addition to JAK inhibitor selection. Mean survival after discontinuation of JAK inhibitors is 11 to 14 months. Pacritinib (not approved in Japan) is suitable for MF patients with thrombocytopenia. JAK inhibitor selection and supportive care by ESA or danazol in lieu of transfusion should be considered. Many classes of drugs other than JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis are under investigation.

Are Small Molecules Effective in Treating Inflammatory Pouch Disorders Following Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis? Here Is Where We Stand.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) management encompasses conventional and advanced treatments, including biological therapy and small molecules. Surgery, particularly in the form of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), is indicated in cases of refractory/severe disease. IPAA can lead to acute complications (e.g., acute pouchitis) as well as late complications, including chronic inflammatory disorders of the pouch. Chronic pouchitis, including the antibiotic-dependent (CADP) and antibiotic-refractory (CARP) forms, represents a significant and current therapeutic challenge due to the substantial need for evidence regarding viable treatment options. Biological therapies have shown promising results, with infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab demonstrating some efficacy in chronic pouchitis; however, robust randomized clinical trials are only available for vedolizumab. This narrative review focuses on the evidence concerning small molecules in chronic pouchitis, specifically Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1P-R) modulators. According to the preliminary studies and reports, Tofacitinib shows a potential effectiveness in CARP. Upadacitinib presents variable outcomes from the case series, necessitating further evaluation. Filgotinib and ozanimod demonstrate anecdotal efficacy. This review underscores the need for high-quality studies and real-world registries to develop robust guidelines for advanced therapies in post-IPAA inflammatory disorders, supported by vigilant clinical monitoring and ongoing education from international IBD specialist societies.

Navigating therapeutic challenges in VEXAS syndrome: exploring IL-6 and JAK inhibitors at the forefront.

VEXAS syndrome, an uncommon yet severe autoimmune disorder stemming from a mutation in the UBA1 gene, is the focus of this paper. The overview encompasses its discovery, epidemiological traits, genetic underpinnings, and clinical presentations. Delving into whether distinct genotypes yield varied clinical phenotypes in VEXAS patients, and the consequent adjustment of treatment strategies based on genotypic and clinical profiles necessitates thorough exploration within the clinical realm. Additionally, the current therapeutic landscape and future outlook are examined, with particular attention to the potential therapeutic roles of IL-6 inhibitors and JAK inhibitors, alongside an elucidation of prevailing limitations and avenues for further research. This study contributes essential theoretical groundwork and clinical insights for both diagnosing and managing VEXAS syndrome.