Radiation dose analysis in interventional neuroradiology of unruptured aneurysm cases.

This study aimed to evaluate the radiation doses (peak skin dose (PSD) and bilateral lens dose) for each interventional neuroradiology procedure. A direct measurement system consisting of small radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter chips and a dosimetry cap made of thin stretchable polyester was used for radiation dosimetry. The mean PSDs for each procedure were 1565 ± 590 mGy (simple technique coil embolization (STCE) cases), 1851 ± 825 mGy (balloon-assisted coil embolization (BACE) cases), 2583 ± 967 mGy (stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) cases), 1690 ± 597 mGy (simple flow-diverter stenting (FDS) cases), and 2214 ± 726 mGy (FDS + coiling cases). The mean PSD was higher in SACE cases than in STCE, BACE, and simple FDS cases. Moreover, the PSD exceeded 2000 mGy and 3000 mGy in 46 (67.6%) and 19 (27.9%) SACE cases, respectively. The left lens doses for each procedure were 126 ± 111 mGy (STCE cases), 163 ± 152 mGy (BACE cases), 184 ± 148 mGy (SACE cases), 144 ± 60 mGy (simple FDS cases), and 242 ± 178 mGy (FDS + coiling cases). The left lens dose in SACE cases was higher than that in STCE cases and exceeded 500 mGy in 3 (4.4%) patients. In FDS + coiling cases, the mean PSD and left lens dose were 2214 ± 726 mGy and 242 ± 178 mGy, respectively. The left lens dose was higher than that in the STCE and BACE cases, with two (15.4%) patients receiving doses >500 mGy in FDS + coiling cases. The detailed data obtained in this study are expected to contribute to the promotion of radiation dose optimization.

Analysis of Requirements within Neuroradiology Job Advertisements in a Specific Timeframe.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The neuroradiology job market is constantly changing along with the skill sets needed by fellowship graduates to participate successfully in the job market. This study aimed to establish a baseline of employer requirements in the neuroradiology job market within the study timeframe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American Society of Neuroradiology and American College of Radiology job boards were queried for neuroradiology positions between August 12, 2022, and December 31, 2022. The positions and requirements were categorized into academic versus private practice, general diagnostic radiology, full-subspecialized neuroradiology, hybrid remote/onsite, outpatient, inpatient/emergency, general interventional radiology procedures, and neuroradiology procedures. Exclusion criteria included neurointerventional only, remote-only, pediatric-only, no preference for neuroradiology, and duplicate posts within and between the job boards. RESULTS: Of 1777 total job posts, 179 were neuroradiology-specific and the remainder were general. Of the 179 neuroradiology-specific jobs, 55 neuroradiology jobs were academic and 124 jobs were private practice. A higher proportion of private practice jobs required general diagnostic interpretations (83% versus 26%), a higher proportion of academic jobs required neuroradiology procedures (56% versus 31%), and a higher proportion of private practice jobs required general interventional radiology procedures (22% versus 0%). Thirty-nine percent of all neuroradiology-specific onsite jobs required neuroradiology procedures, and 15% required general interventional radiology procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Because there was a sizable difference between general radiology and procedure requirements between academic and private practice positions, tailoring fellowship training for career aspirations of neuroradiology fellows should be considered to adapt to the skills needed for the evolving job market. In the queried timeframe, 61% of neuroradiology-specific onsite jobs did not have a specific procedure skill requirement for job applicants. This article serves as a single snapshot of the job market and its requirements for neuroradiologists, to aid in planning training to meet the needs of employers.

Representation of International Medical Graduates Among Diagnostic Radiology Chairs, Neuroradiology Chiefs, and Program Directors.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The number of international medical graduates (IMGs) entering radiology residencies and neuroradiology fellowships averaged 9.7% and 20.9% from 2021 to 2023, respectively. We aimed to determine whether IMG graduates are populating leadership roles at a proportionate rate in diagnostic radiology (DR) and neuroradiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We surveyed 191 DR program directors, 94 neuroradiology program directors (PDs), 192 chairs of radiology, and 91 directors of neuroradiology inquiring about their original citizenship and medical school (American Medical Graduates [AMG] vs IMG). We reviewed institutional websites to obtain missing data and recorded H indices for each person using Scopus. RESULTS: We confirmed the original citizenship and medical school location in 61-75% and 93-98% of each leadership group. We found that 16.2% of DR program directors, 43.7% of neuroradiology PDs, 28.5% of Chairs, and 40.6% of neuroradiology directors were not originally US citizens. The IMG rate was 18/188 (9.6%), 20/90 (22.2%), 26/186 (14.0%), and 19/85 (22.4%) for the same groups respectively. The most common country of origin and medical school cited was India for all leadership groups. IMGs had a median H index of 14 while AMG 10, significantly different (p = 0.021) CONCLUSION: Compared to the rate of diagnostic and neuroradiology trainees entering from 2021 to 2023, IMGs are proportionately represented at the leadership positions studied. The H index of the IMGs was higher than AMG. We conclude that IMGs have made substantial and proportionate inroads in radiology and neuroradiology leadership.

Clinical diagnostic reference levels in neuroradiology based on clinical indication.

This study focuses on patient radiation exposure in interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures, a field that has advanced significantly since its inception in the 1980s. INR employs minimally invasive techniques to treat complex cerebrovascular diseases in the head, neck, and spine. The study establishes diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for three clinical indications (CIs): stroke (S), brain aneurysms (ANs), and brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Data from 209 adult patients were analyzed, and DRLs were determined in terms of various dosimetric and technical quantities. For stroke, the established DRLs median values were found to be 78 Gy cm2, 378 mGy, 118 mGy, 12 min, 442 images, and 15 runs. Similarly, DRLs for brain AN are 85 Gy cm2, 611 mGy, 95.5 mGy, 19.5, 717 images, and 26 runs. For brain AVM, the DRL's are 180 Gy cm2, 1144 mGy, 537 mGy, 36 min, 1375 images, and 31 runs. Notably, this study is unique in reporting DRLs for specific CIs within INR procedures, providing valuable insights for optimizing patient safety and radiation exposure management.

The ASNR International Collaborations Committee: Cultivating a Global Learning Community.

The American Society of Neuroradiology has expanded its global presence, driven by the efforts of the International Collaborations Committee. This committee is actively involved in training radiologists and fostering collaborations worldwide in the fields of education, research, and community service. This article explores key initiatives of the committee, such as the Anne G. Osborn ASNR International Outreach Professor Program, the International Imaging Series, and Virtual Reading Rooms. Additionally, we provide insight into recent developments related to the pandemic and outline future opportunities.

Can large language models pass official high-grade exams of the European Society of Neuroradiology courses? A direct comparison between OpenAI chatGPT 3.5, OpenAI GPT4 and Google Bard.

We compared different LLMs, notably chatGPT, GPT4, and Google Bard and we tested whether their performance differs in subspeciality domains, in executing examinations from four different courses of the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) notably anatomy/embryology, neuro-oncology, head and neck and pediatrics. Written exams of ESNR were used as input data, related to anatomy/embryology (30 questions), neuro-oncology (50 questions), head and neck (50 questions), and pediatrics (50 questions). All exams together, and each exam separately were introduced to the three LLMs: chatGPT 3.5, GPT4, and Google Bard. Statistical analyses included a group-wise Friedman test followed by a pair-wise Wilcoxon test with multiple comparison corrections. Overall, there was a significant difference between the 3 LLMs (p < 0.0001), with GPT4 having the highest accuracy (70%), followed by chatGPT 3.5 (54%) and Google Bard (36%). The pair-wise comparison showed significant differences between chatGPT vs GPT 4 (p < 0.0001), chatGPT vs Bard (p < 0. 0023), and GPT4 vs Bard (p < 0.0001). Analyses per subspecialty showed the highest difference between the best LLM (GPT4, 70%) versus the worst LLM (Google Bard, 24%) in the head and neck exam, while the difference was least pronounced in neuro-oncology (GPT4, 62% vs Google Bard, 48%). We observed significant differences in the performance of the three different LLMs in the running of official exams organized by ESNR. Overall GPT 4 performed best, and Google Bard performed worst. This difference varied depending on subspeciality and was most pronounced in head and neck subspeciality.

[Neuroradiology for the Ophthalmologist - Part 2 Efference]. / Neuroradiologie für den Augenarzt. Teil 2: Efferenz.

Eye movements are a complex task requiring a large number of structures coordinated by three cranial nerves and their centres in the brainstem. Various pathologies may affect any part of the pathway controlling the eye movements and their diagnosis is often based on history and clinical examination. Modern advances in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have recently added a valuable tool in the diagnosis of oculo-motor-related diseases.

Diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology training in the UK: a national trainee survey.

AIM: Training structure in neuroradiology can be variable, nationally and internationally. Globally, there is a trend towards standardised training pathways, curricula and targeted competencies. Currently, there is limited understanding of the structure of neuroradiology training in the UK. This survey aims to: [1] identify different contemporary models of neuroradiology training in the UK, [2] compare UK trainees' commitments against national and international standards, and [3] understand whether career expectations match the predicted future demands of neuroradiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was developed after consultation with BSNR and UKNG representatives. The eligibility criteria included current neuroradiology trainees in the UK with at least 3 months of experience or had recently completed neuroradiology training, but less than 18 months had elapsed since achieving a certificate of completion of training. RESULTS: A total of 50 trainees responded to the survey; 26 (52%) diagnostic neuroradiologists (DNRs) and 24 (48%) interventional neuroradiologists (INRs) with an overall mean age of 33 years. The mean duration of training at the time of survey was 18 months. The survey details trainee demographics, experience at work, research and teaching commitments and future goals. CONCLUSION: Most respondents are satisfied with their training and 90% want to remain in the UK after completion of training. There is room for improvement but the future of training and working in neuroradiology seems promising internationally, with ever-evolving techniques and developments. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Advances in knowledge: This study evaluates neuroradiology training in the UK to enhance the training of future neuroradiologists, and safeguard the future of the speciality.