Beating Heart Validation of Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Pericardiotomy Tool.

INTRODUCTION: Epicardial procedures frequently require pericardial manipulation. We aimed to develop a nonsurgical percutaneous pericardial modification tool that may (1) facilitate epicardial-based procedures by enabling adhesiolysis or (2) attenuate the myocardial constraining effect of the pericardium. METHODS: Three novel devices were developed to enable pericardiotomy, all of which can be deployed in over-the-wire fashion following percutaneous epicardial access. The grasper permits us to seize the pericardial membrane providing leverage for incision. The scissors enables anterograde cutting maneuvers. The reverse-slitter allows retrograde incisions; in addition, this device has a deflectable tip that increases the potential cutting area. We optimized these tools for safety by including electrodes to test for phrenic nerve stimulation as well as myocardial stimulation to determine directionality of the cutting devices. The base of the scissors and reverse-slitter are also blunt ensuring that the cutting element is always away from the myocardium. RESULTS: Following 5 nonbeating heart bench test experiments for prototype development, 11 animal (9 canine, 2 swine) studies were performed. Of these 2 were proof-of-concept open chest studies; the remaining 9 were entirely closed-chest, percutaneous procedures allowing for remodification of the prototypes. The tools successfully permitted incision of the pericardium in all studies. Hemodynamic measurements were assessed postincision and showed no compromise of systolic function. No coronary artery or phrenic nerve damage was seen in any study. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous pericardiotomy is feasible and appears to be safe. It may provide leverage in epicardial-based procedures and offer treatment options in disease processes characterized by pericardial restraint.

Robotic Endoscopic Off-Pump Total Pericardiectomy in Constrictive Pericarditis.

OBJECTIVE: Although rare, constrictive pericarditis is a serious condition with debilitating symptoms and often severe heart failure. Total pericardiectomy is the most effective treatment and is traditionally performed via median sternotomy. With the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques, there have been reports of partial pericardiectomy via thoracoscopy but with suboptimal exposure and difficulty identifying both phrenic nerves. Robotic surgery offers both small incisions and enhanced visualization. We present four cases of robotic endoscopic off-pump total pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. METHODS: Four patients underwent off-pump total pericardiectomy with robotic assistance for constrictive pericarditis. All had constrictive physiology demonstrated by right heart catheterization and/or echocardiogram. One was also found to have coronary artery disease and underwent concurrent totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery. Ports were placed in the left second, fourth, and sixth intercostal spaces. The left lung was isolated and deflated with CO2 insufflation, aiding in exposure. With the use of electrocautery, the pericardium was removed first posterior to the left phrenic nerve, then anteriorly all the way to the right phrenic nerve, and caudally from the diaphragmatic reflection to the great vessel cephalad. A stabilizer in the subcostal fourth robotic arm was used to assist in the dissection. RESULTS: Two of four patients were extubated within 6 hours after surgery and transferred to the floor on postoperative day 1. Both were discharged home by postoperative day 5. Two of four patients had preoperative sequelae from chronic constriction and necessitated longer hospital and intensive care unit stays but had improvement in symptoms and were discharged home within 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Total pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis can be performed using a robotic approach. In contrast to thoracoscopy, it offers better visualization of both phrenic nerves, avoids injury, and allows a thorough pericardial dissection. In our experience, the robotic left chest approach has proven more efficacious in removing the posterior pericardium than is allowed with median sternotomy.

Evaluation of Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy in Hemodynamically Significant Pericardial Effusion (Review of 10-Years Experience in Single Center).

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (PBP) has been successful in managing large pericardial effusions, particularly in patients with malignant conditions. The objective of this study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of this procedure (PBP) in patients who had recurrent life threatening pericardial effusion at West Virginia University Hospital (WVUH). METHODS: This is retrospective review of consecutive series of pericardial windows by PBP. This report entails our experience of 36 procedures performed from November 2002 to November 2012 by PBP. RESULTS: Thirty-six percutaneous balloon pericardiotomies were performed (20 males and 16 females) with a mean age of 58 ± 15 years. Lung cancer (50%) was the most common diagnosis with small cell type (29%) being most frequent. Other causes of pericardial effusion requiring PBP procedure included breast cancer (13.2%) and gastrointestinal cancer (15.7). Five patients had previously required pericardiocentesis in the past, and 31 patients had PBP as the first treatment for the pericardial effusion. There were no acute complications. The procedures were successful and well tolerated. Technical success of procedure was 100%. The 30-day survival was 81 percent and there were no infectious complications during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy is safe and effective technique for the management of patients with severe recurrent life threatening pericardial effusion.

[Surgical Repair of Severely Calcific Constrictive Pericarditis;Report of a Case].

A 74-year-old male presented with exertional dyspnea and leg edema. Chest X-ray and computed tomography demonstrated dense calcification of the pericardium. Based on a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis, pericardiectomy was performed without the use of extracorporeal circulation. During the operation, we employed a Harmonic Scalpel (Naginata-type) to peel off the calcified pericardium around the right and left ventricles. The calcified pericardium around the right atrium was found to be so firmly adhered to the atrial wall that peeling off the calcified tissue was difficult. Therefore, we used a Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) to break down the calcification. After the surgery, the patient's dyspnea on exertion and leg edema resolved, and he recovered without any complications. Regarding the surgical treatment of severely calcific constrictive pericarditis, Naginata-type Harmonic Scalpel and CUSA are very useful for peeling off the calcified tissue of the pericardium and/or breaking down the calcification.

[Pericardiectomy of effusive constrictive pericarditis with an ultrasonic scalpel; report of a case].

Effusive constrictive pericarditis is a rare clinical entity characterized by concurrent pericardial effusion and visceral pericardial constriction. The most effective therapy for this state is pericardiectomy with complete removal of the parietal and visceral membranes, although the perioperative mortality and morbidity can be high. We presented a case of a 45-year-old man in whom a visceral pericardiectomy with waffle procedure was successfully performed using an ultrasonic scalpel without use of cardiopulmonary bypass. His postoperative course was uneventful and cardiac hemodynamics restored to normal. There were no signs or symptoms of recurrence in 2 years of follow-up.

Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy using the Inoue balloon for patients with recurrent pericardial tamponade.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent pericardial effusion is often caused by pericardial metastases of extra-cardiac tumours. These effusions may be moderate to severe, leading to cardiac tamponade. The treatment is emergency pericardiocentesis but in spite of the initial success of that treatment, the effusions have high recurrence rates. Here we describe our experience of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (PBP) using the Inoue balloon for the management of three patients with malignant pericardial effusions secondary to lung cancer. METHODS: In our clinic, three patients with recurrent pericardial effusion secondary to lung cancer were treated with percutaneous pericardiotomy with an Inoue valvuloplasty balloon catheter through the subxiphoid approach. RESULTS: Successful drainage with balloon pericardiotomy was achieved in all patients without severe complications. In all cases, only one pericardial site was dilated at least three times. During the four to six months of follow up, there were no recurrences of the effusion or tamponade. All patients were still alive. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, PBP with the Inoue balloon appears to be a simple and safe procedure with a high success rate. PBP is an effective method for the management of patients with recurrent, large, malignant pericardial effusions.

Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy as the initial and definitive treatment for malignant pericardial effusion.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Malignant pericardial effusion has a high recurrence rate after pericardiocentesis. We sought to confirm the efficacy of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy as the initial treatment of choice for these effusions. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the clinical, echocardiographic, and follow-up characteristics of a consecutive series of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomies carried out in a single center in patients with advanced cancer. RESULTS: Seventeen percutaneous balloon pericardiotomies were performed in 16 patients with a mean age of 66.2 (15.2) years. Fourteen patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic neoplastic disease, 3 had previously required pericardiocentesis, and in the remaining patients percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy was the first treatment for the effusion. All patients had a severe circumferential effusion, and most presented evidence of hemodynamic compromise on echocardiography. In all cases, the procedure was successful, there were no acute complications, and it was well tolerated at the first attempt. There were no infectious complications during follow-up (median, 44 [interquartile range, 36-225] days). One patient developed a large pleural effusion that did not require treatment. Three patients needed a new pericardial procedure: 2 had elective pericardial window surgeries and 1 had a second percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy is a simple, safe technique that can be effective in the prevention of recurrence in many patients with severe malignant pericardial effusion. The characteristics of this procedure make it particularly useful in this group of patients to avoid more aggressive, poorly tolerated approaches.

Pericardium reconstruction with the starfish heart positioner after extended thymectomy with combined left side pericardium resection.

We describe the use of the Starfish 2 heart positioning device as an aid to pericardium reconstruction after en bloc resection of mediastinal tumors of the left pericardium by use of median sternotomy with anterolateral thoracotomy. The Starfish device, which is a tool for off-pump coronary artery procedures, allows excellent cardiac positioning and hemodynamic stability during pericardium reconstruction through a median sternotomy with anterolateral thoracotomy.

Video-assisted pericardioscopic surgery: refinement of a new technique for implanting epimyocardial pacemaker leads.

OBJECTIVE: Current alternative approaches for pacemaker lead implantation imply the breach of the pleural space. Recently, the feasibility of experimental lead implantation by rigid endoscopy has been described. The use of flexible endoscopes and a standardised application has not been realised yet. Our main goal was to compare rigid and flexible endoscopy and to establish a standardised protocol for the implementation of a closed-chest subxiphoid approach for epimyocardial lead implantation. METHODS: Rigid and flexible endoscopes were used for placement of screw-in pacing leads (4-F). A total of 17 adult pigs (80 kg) were anaesthetised and a 10-mm subxiphoid axial incision performed. The pericardium was opened and entered under endoscopic vision. Epimyocardial electrodes were implanted through the endoscope onto all four chambers. Standard haemodynamic measurements and pacing measurements were carried out. RESULTS: Both methods were deployed in the first three individuals. Superior endorsement of rigid endoscopy, due to better orientation and stability, led to its exclusive deployment in the remaining 14 individuals. Access to the implantation sites was quick (<10 min). A plastic cover had to be applied to reduce arrhythmia (VentricularExtraSystoles(bare): 17 ± 2.2 min(-1) vs VentricularExtraSystoles(cover): 5 ± 1.9 min(-1); n = 4). Measured pacing parameters were comparable with classic endocardial-derived thresholds. Post-mortem examination revealed no relevant damage/injury and/or bleeding in the heart and circumjacent tissue. There was no evidence of injury at the implantation sites and the corresponding pericardium. The electrodes showed excellent anchorage inside the myocardial tissue (penetration depths: 3 ± 0.2mm) and resisted high tractive forces. CONCLUSION: Flexible endoscopy is not suitable for exclusive deployment inside the pericardial space, whereas rigid endoscopy presented itself as a safe, fast and simple approach for epimyocardial lead implantation using an insulating trocar. Without cover, malignant arrhythmia constrains the implementation of video-assisted pericardioscopic surgery (VAPS). Subxiphoid VAPS permits optimal lead positioning under direct vision without fluoroscopy, without the breach of the pleural space and with a short procedural duration (<60 min). Our standardised minimal-invasive approach allows visualisation and intervention, potentially of all intrapericardial structures.

Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy in a patient with end stage renal disease with recurrent pericardial effusion & pericardial tamponade.

A case report of 37-year-old female with end stage renal disease presented with recurrent pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, who underwent percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy using an Inoue balloon dilating catheter, to create a non-surgical pericardial window. The procedure of non-surgical pericardial window is safe and effective alternative to conventional more invasive surgical pericardial window. It is concluded that percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy is helpful in the management of massive pericardial effusions particularly in patients with chronic renal failure and poor clinical condition.

One-lung ventilation using a wire-guided endobronchial blocker for thoracoscopic pericardial fenestration in a dog.

Instead of a conventional double lumen tube, an Arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker was used to achieve one-lung ventilation in a dog undergoing thoracoscopic pericardiectomy. Overall, lung separation was easy to perform and surgical conditions for the creation of a pericardial window were adequate. Special ventilation strategies were applied.

Case report: Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy using Inoue balloon for patients with massive pericardial effusion.

Two patients presenting with huge pericardial effusion were treated with pericardiotomy, using an Inoue balloon dilating catheter, to prevent recurrences and achieve symptoms relief. The procedure is a modification of an original technique reported by Palacios et al. gaining advantage of the Inoue balloon self positioning abilities and low profile. No early recurrence was observed. In both cases the effect was excellent and lead to quick ambulation sparing the patients the risk of more aggressive surgical procedure and general anesthesia. It is concluded that percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy supported by the Inoue balloon unique versatility is a simple and safe way to drain massive pericardial effusions.

CT-guided tube pericardiostomy: a safe and effective technique in the management of postsurgical pericardial effusion.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy and examine the competitive cost of CT-guided tube pericardiostomy in the management of symptomatic postsurgical pericardial effusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 36 patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion were treated with CT-guided percutaneous placement of an indwelling pericardial catheter, for a total of 39 CT-guided tube pericardiostomy procedures. Thirty-three patients (92%) had undergone major cardiothoracic surgery, and three patients (8%) had undergone minimally invasive procedures. The medical records were retrospectively reviewed for clinical presentation, surgical history, imaging studies performed, procedural details, fluid characterization, and outcome. Charge comparison was performed with the American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology codes and information acquired from the billing department at our facility. RESULTS: All 39 CT-guided tube pericardiostomy procedures were performed successfully without clinically significant complications. After 33 of the 39 procedures (85%), symptoms did not recur after the catheter was removed. Three of 36 patients (8%) had a recurrence of pericardial effusion. Comparison of procedure charges showed an 89% saving over intraoperative pericardial window procedures and no significant difference compared with ultrasound-guided tube pericardiostomy. Eight patients (21% of procedures) needed pleural drainage procedures, all of which were performed in the CT suite immediately after the tube pericardiostomy procedure. CONCLUSION: CT-guided tube pericardiostomy is a safe and effective alternative to surgical drainage in the care of patients with clinically significant pericardial effusion after cardiothoracic surgery and has the additional benefit of substantial cost savings.

Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy in a patient with advanced case of malignant pericardial effusion and tamponade.

Surgical creation of a pericardial window has been a standard procedure for relieving symptoms of patients presenting with recurrent pericardial effusion. In this report we describe the application of Multitrack balloon catheter for creating a pericardial window in a patient who had recurrent pericardial effusion with tamponade as a result of advance malignant disease of breast.

Surgical procedures of the thorax.

Thoracic disease is common in cattle and is a significant cause for economic losses in the stocker and feedlot industries. In most cases, economic constraints limit diagnostic investigation and affect treatment options. Although medical management is, by far, the most appropriate therapeutic intervention in such cases, surgical management of some respiratory diseases can allow for profitable return to productivity. Surgical procedures of the thorax most often involve thoracotomy or pericardiotomy. Tracheal reconstruction and invasion of the mediastinum are rarely indicated in cattle.

Off-pump pericardiectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel and a heart positioner.

The surgical treatment of constrictive pericarditis often requires extensive pericardial dissection under cardiopulmonary bypass. We performed a pericardiectomy in a patient with constrictive pericarditis without cardiopulmonary bypass, with assistance of a sternal retractor and a suction heart positioner. The severely calcified pericardium, which adhered tightly to the epicardium, was dissected with an ultrasonic scalpel. The operation was completed without blood transfusion. There was no malignant arrhythmia.

Pericardiectomy using the starfish heart positioner.

We describe the use of the Starfish 2 heart positioning device as an aid to performing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Whilst mainly a tool for off-pump coronary artery surgery, the Starfish device allows excellent cardiac positioning and haemodynamic stability during pericadiectomy via median sternotomy, without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass.