Efficacy and safety of different pharmacological interventions in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to indirectly compare and rank the different drugs that have been studied in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with tardive dyskinesia (TD) in terms of their efficacy in ameliorating the symptoms of TD and safety. DESIGN: A network meta-analysis and a systematic review were registered prospectively on PROSPERO under the ID: CRD42023407823 and were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-NMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Sciences, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched to identify relevant records. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Any parallel randomized blinded controlled clinical trials that studied the use of any medications in treating TD and assessed the symptoms using a functional scale that has been previously validated. DATA EXTRACTION: The standardized mean difference of improvement along with the reported adverse events for each drug was extracted from each trial, and a network meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred seventeen patients in 33 RCTs were included in the analysis. Twenty-three different drugs were compared to placebo in terms of reduction in TD symptoms. Among these, valbenazine 80 mg (SMD = - 1.66, 95%CI = [- 2.55; - 0.78]), valbenazine 40 mg (- 1.00, [- 1.89; - 0.11]), and vitamin E (- 0.77, [- 1.45; - 0.1]) significantly reduced TD symptoms in comparison to placebo, while deutetrabenazine 36 mg (- 1.00, [- 2.12; 0.11]) and reserpine (- 0.54, [- 1.09; 0.02]) did not significantly reduce symptoms. Some serious adverse events were reported for valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, which included mainly psychiatric symptoms such as depression, worsening of schizophrenia, and suicidal ideation, while mild adverse events were reported for other drugs, and their incidence in the treatment arms was comparable to those in the placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS: Valbenazine (80 and 40 mg) and vitamin E demonstrated efficacy in treating tardive dyskinesia. However, the significant side effects of valbenazine should prompt further investigation of alternative treatment modalities.

Mining of neurological adverse events associated with valbenazine: A post-marketing analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system.

PURPOSE: Valbenazine is commonly used to treat tardive dyskinesia, and we conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to evaluate neurological safety signals associated with valbenazine. METHODS: Data was collected in FAERS from the second quarter of 2017 to the fourth quarter of 2023 for data cleaning. Neurological adverse event (AE) signals of valbenazine were mined by calculating reporting odds ratios (ROR), information component (IC) and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). The serious and non-serious cases and signals were prioritized using a rating scale. RESULTS: The number of neurological AE reports where the primary suspect (PS) drug was 8981 for valbenazine. Significant AE signals were identified by the preferred term (PT) analysis for valbenazine, including somnolence (ROR 19.69), tremor (ROR 15.17), and tardive dyskinesia (ROR 236.91), among which 18 AEs were identified as new signals. Patient age (p < 0.009) and sex (p = 0.197) might be associated with an increased risk of neurological AE severity. Notably, the association between valbenazine and neurological disorders remained when stratified by sex, age, and reporter type. AE timing analysis was performed for the drug and four moderate clinical priority signals [i.e., somnolence, balance disorder, parkinsonism, and akathisia (priorities 7)], showing the same early failure type profiles. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in neurological safety signals is identified in the post-marketing research of valbenazine. Clinicians need to pay attention to not only common AEs but also be alert to new neurological AE signals when using valbenazine.

Sustained Treatment Response and Global Improvements With Long-term Valbenazine in Patients With Tardive Dyskinesia.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Using data from KINECT® 4, a phase 3, 48-week study of valbenazine, post hoc analyses were conducted to assess long-term outcomes that are relevant to the real-world management of tardive dyskinesia (TD). METHODS/PROCEDURES: Post hoc analyses of the participants of the KINECT 4 study who completed 48 weeks of open-label valbenazine (40 or 80 mg) treatment were conducted. Valbenazine effects on TD were evaluated using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Clinical Global Impression of Change-TD (CGI-TD), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). FINDINGS/RESULTS: Of 103 participants completing 48 weeks of treatment, 55% experienced clinically meaningful improvement (defined as ≥2-point reduction in AIMS total score [sum of items 1 - 7, evaluated by site raters]) by week 4; at week 48, 97% met this threshold. The percentage of completers who achieved AIMS total score response thresholds of ≥10% to ≥90% increased over time, with 86% of completers reaching ≥50% improvement. Of the 40 (39%) completers with AIMS ≥50% response at week 8, 38 (95%) sustained this response at week 48; 81% of those who did not meet this threshold at week 8 had achieved it by week 48. At week 48, more than 85% of completers achieved CGI-TD and PGIC ratings of "much improved" or "very much improved." IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants who completed 48 weeks of treatment with once-daily valbenazine experienced substantial clinically meaningful and sustained TD improvements. These findings indicate that valbenazine can be a highly effective long-term treatment in patients with TD.

Mining and analysis of security alert signals of valbenazine based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.

BACKGROUND: Valbenazine is used for tardive movement disorders in adults. Current studies on its safety are mostly from clinical trials and small case reports, limiting information on rare adverse reactions. This study investigated valbenazine-related adverse event (AE) risk signals using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: Valbenazine AEs data were collected from the FAERS database from 2017 Q2 to 2023 Q1, employing methods like reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean. RESULTS: After data cleaning and drug screening, there were 20,837 AEs primarily suspecting valbenazine, involving 26 system organ classes and 125 AEs related to valbenazine at the preferred terms level. AEs related to valbenazine were mainly concentrated in nervous system disorders, general disorders and administration site conditions, and psychiatric disorders. Eye disorders and gastrointestinal disorders are new AEs not labeled in the valbenazine instructions. In addition, some new potential AE signals were found, such as Tardive dyskinesia and eyelid function disorder. CONCLUSION: The common AEs of valbenazine in the real world are consistent with the instructions, but there are some newly discovered suspicious AEs.

Signal mining study of severe cutaneous adverse events of valaciclovir or acyclovir based on the FAERS database.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore a comprehensive empirical investigation and assess SCARs related to valaciclovir or acyclovir based on FAERS database from FDA, thus providing a theoretical foundation for the rational application of drugs in clinic. METHODS: SCARs reports relevant to valaciclovir or acyclovir were searched in FAERS database from the 2004 Q1 to 2023 Q2. These data were further mined by a proportional analysis and Bayesian approach to detect signals of SCARs caused by two drugs. Meanwhile, the clinical characteristics, onset time, correlation, and stratification analysis of the two drugs in SCARs were analyzed. RESULTS: Both drugs exhibited positive signals for drug reaction with DRESS, AGEP, TEN, SJS-TEN overlap and SJS. The median onset time of SCARs caused by valaciclovir or acyclovir was 30 days vs 10 day for DRESS, 11 days vs 9 days for AGEP, 17 days vs 12 days (TEN) and 12 days vs 8 days (SJS). Excluding the effect of combinational drugs, there was an association between the two antiviral drugs and SCARs. CONCLUSION: By analyzing the FAERS database, the risk trends of SCARs caused by valaciclovir or acyclovir have been identified, providing valuable insights to recognize various types of SCARs in clinics.

Low-Molecular-Weight Fish Collagen Peptide (Valine-Glycine-Proline-Hydroxyproline-Glycine-Proline-Alanine-Glycine) Prevents Osteoarthritis Symptoms in Chondrocytes and Monoiodoacetate-Injected Rats.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of low-molecular-weight fish collagen (valine-glycine-proline-hydroxyproline-glycine-proline-alanine-glycine; LMWCP) on H2O2- or LPS-treated primary chondrocytes and monoiodoacetate (MIA)-induced osteoarthritis rat models. Our findings indicated that LMWCP treatment exhibited protective effects by preventing chondrocyte death and reducing matrix degradation in both H2O2-treated primary chondrocytes and cartilage tissue from MIA-induced osteoarthritis rats. This was achieved by increasing the levels of aggrecan, collagen type I, collagen type II, TIMP-1, and TIMP-3, while simultaneously decreasing catabolic factors such as phosphorylation of Smad, MMP-3, and MMP-13. Additionally, LMWCP treatment effectively suppressed the activation of inflammation and apoptosis pathways in both LPS-treated primary chondrocytes and cartilage tissue from MIA-induced osteoarthritis rats. These results suggest that LMWCP supplementation ameliorates the progression of osteoarthritis through its direct impact on inflammation and apoptosis in chondrocytes.

Efficacy of single-pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single-pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science collected only randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs in people with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The search period is from the establishment of the database to July 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manage 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software. This review ultimately included 32 references involving 16 273 patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that a total of 11 single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs were included, namely: Amlodipine/valsartan, Telmisartan/amlodipine, Losartan/HCTZ, Candesartan/HCTZ, Amlodipine/benazepril, Telmisartan/HCTZ, Valsartan/HCTZ, Irbesartan/amlodipine, Amlodipine/losartan, Irbesartan/HCTZ, and Perindopril/amlodipine. According to SUCRA, Irbesartan/amlodipine may rank first in reducing systolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 92.2%); Amlodipine/losartan may rank first in reducing diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 95.1%); Telmisartan/amlodipine may rank first in blood pressure control rates (SUCRA: 83.5%); Amlodipine/losartan probably ranks first in diastolic response rate (SUCRA: 84.5%). Based on Ranking Plot of the Network, we can conclude that single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs are superior to monotherapy, and ARB/CCB combination has better advantages than other SPC in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure control rate, and diastolic response rate. However, due to the small number of some drug studies, the lack of relevant studies has led to not being included in this study, which may impact the results, and readers should interpret the results with caution.

Effects of 5-fluorouracil Co-administration on Blood Pressure in Patients Maintained on Antihypertensives: a Retrospective Case Series.

This study aimed to investigate the possible drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of 5-FU with antihypertensives metabolised by CYP3A4 and 2C9, using blood pressure (BP) as a pharmacodynamic (PD) parameter. Patients who received 5-FU in combination with antihypertensives metabolised by CYP3A4 or 2C9, specifically, a) amlodipine, nifedipine, or amlodipine + nifedipine, b) candesartan or valsartan, or c) amlodipine + candesartan, amlodipine + losartan, or nifedipine + valsartan, (Group A, n = 20) were identified. Patients who received 5-FU with WF and antihypertensives, specifically, a) amlodipine or b) amlodipine + telmisartan, amlodipine + candesartan, or amlodipine + valsartan, (Group B, n = 5) or 5-FU alone (Group C, n = 25) were also identified and analysed as a comparator and control group, respectively. Regarding the peak BP levels during chemotherapy, there was a significant increase in both SBP (P < 0.0002 and 0.0013) and DBP (P = 0.0243 and 0.0032) in Groups A and C, respectively (Tukey-Kramer test). In contrast, although SBP also increased in Group B during chemotherapy, the change was not statistically significant and there was a decrease in DBP. The significant increase in SBP can be attributed to chemotherapy-induced hypertension by 5-FU or other drugs in the chemotherapeutic regimens. However, when comparing the lowest BP levels during chemotherapy, there was a decrease in SBP and DBP in all groups from the baseline values. The median time to peak and lowest BP was at least 2 weeks and 3 weeks, respectively, for all groups, suggesting that a BP lowering effect was observed following the offset of the initial chemotherapy-induced hypertension. At least 1 month after 5-FU chemotherapy, the SBP and DBP returned to baseline values in all groups. Since Group B also showed a significant increase in PT-INR, possibly demonstrating 5-FU inhibition of CYP activity and, consequently, of WF metabolism, it is likely that 5-FU also inhibited the metabolism of the antihypertensive drugs. The findings suggest possible DDIs between 5-FU and antihypertensives metabolised by CYP3A4.

Cancer Risk of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Valsartan: A Population-based Study.

ABSTRACT: Nitrosamine contamination of generic valsartan was found in 2018. This study aimed to investigate whether long-term use of valsartan increases cancer risk. Patients prescribed valsartan or amlodipine (control group) from 1 January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2010, were identified using the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority, a territory-wide database in Hong Kong. Patients previously diagnosed with cancer, prescribed both medications, taking the medication, or followed up for <1 year were excluded. Cancer incidence, adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, was the primary outcome and was estimated using Poisson regression in R version 3.6.1. Among 5023 valsartan users and 3692 amlodipine users, 887 and 740 were diagnosed with cancers during median follow-up periods of 10.97 and 12.12 years, respectively. The adjusted incidence of cancer in valsartan and amlodipine users was 165.29 (95% confidence interval 154.76-175.53) and 180.12 (167.35-193.67) per 10,000 person-years, respectively. The cancer incidence rate ratio of valsartan relative to amlodipine was 0.94 (0.88-1.01). Adjusted incidence rate ratios of valsartan relative to amlodipine were significant for breast cancer (0.63, 0.46-0.86) only. Our findings do not suggest an increase in incidence of cancer with long-term valsartan use. The duration of follow-up of more than 10 years of the study provides the reassurance that an increase in cancer risk is unlikely. Further studies are needed to elucidate the long-term effect of valsartan use on the risk of specific types of cancer.

Diagnostic approach to elucidate the efficacy and side effects of direct-acting antivirals in HCV infected patients.

INTRODUCTION: The conventional interferon therapy of hepatitis C virus has been substituted substantially with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir due to constraints in efficacy and tolerability. This study aimed diagnostically to monitor the effectiveness and side effects of direct-acting antivirals in the management of HCV infections. METHODOLOGY: This prospective study was conducted on HCV-infected patients treated with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir. Different serological, biochemical, hematological, and molecular techniques were used for the assessment of patients. Only treatment-naive patients aged ≥ 18 to 75 years received 12 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was a sustained virologic response with undetectable HCV RNA in the patients' serum at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: We identified 229 cases of confirmed HCV infections by PCR, 94.3% of which had genotype 3. The study population comprised 66% females and 34% males with a median age of 42.2 ± 10.6 SD. Ninety-three percent of the patients accomplished SVR at week 12. The combined therapy of SOF/DAC achieved the highest efficacy rate (92.6%) among the different HCV genotype 3 patients. A statistically significant relationship was observed between low baseline viral load (p < 0.001; 95% CI = 1.2-3.1) and HCV genotype 3 with minor side effects, including lethargy, headache, nausea, insomnia, diarrhea, and fever. CONCLUSIONS: HCV-infected patients can be treated well with an interferon-free SOF/DAC regimen, tolerated with generally mild adverse effects with a higher SVR.

Molecular Initiating Events Associated with Drug-Induced Liver Malignant Tumors: An Integrated Study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Toxicity Predictions.

Liver malignant tumors (LMTs) represent a serious adverse drug event associated with drug-induced liver injury. Increases in endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) have attracted attention in recent years, due to their liver function-inhibiting abilities. Exposure to EDCs can induce nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, which are major etiologies of LMTs, through interaction with nuclear receptors (NR) and stress response pathways (SRs). Therefore, exposure to potential EDC drugs could be associated with drug-induced LMTs. However, the drug classes associated with LMTs and the molecular initiating events (MIEs) that are specific to these drugs are not well understood. In this study, using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, we detected LMT-inducing drug signals based on adjusted odds ratios. Furthermore, based on the hypothesis that drug-induced LMTs are triggered by NR and SR modulation of potential EDCs, we used the quantitative structure-activity relationship platform for toxicity prediction to identify potential MIEs that are specific to LMT-inducing drug classes. Events related to cell proliferation and apoptosis, DNA damage, and lipid accumulation were identified as potential MIEs, and their relevance to LMTs was supported by the literature. The findings of this study may contribute to drug development and research, as well as regulatory decision making.

Sofosbuvir-based therapies in genotype 2 hepatitis C virus cirrhosis: A real-life experience with focus on ribavirin dose.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies for the treatment of cirrhosis from hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 infection. Data of all consecutive HCV genotype 2 cirrhotic patients who started sofosbuvir-based treatments between January 2015 and March 2017 in eight Italian tertiary hospitals were collected retrospectively. Overall, 273 patients (Child A: 94.5%) were enrolled. In the 194 subjects treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin, median initial ribavirin dosage was 13.9 mg/kg/day, and therapy duration was 16 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 93.8% in intention-to-treat (ITT) and 95.3% in per-protocol (PP) analyses for the 129 treatment-naïve patients, and 96.9% (ITT) and 98.4% (PP) for the 65 treatment-experienced subjects. Adverse events were reported in 142 patients (73.2%), but only 1.5% discontinued treatment. Eighty-eight subjects with treatment-induced anemia (mild: 34.5%, moderate: 7.7%, severe: 3.1%) had to reduce ribavirin dosage, but SVR rates were comparable to the weight-based dose group, both in ITT (95.4% and 94.3%) and PP (97.7% and 95.2%) analyses, respectively. Moreover, ITT and PP SVR rates were similar between shorter (<20 weeks) (94.1% and 96.0%, respectively) and prolonged (≥20 weeks) regimens (95.7% and 96.7%, respectively). SVR rates in the 79 subjects treated with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (without ribavirin) were similar (ITT: 96.2%; PP: 97.4%, respectively), without de novo/worsening anemia. In conclusion, in a real-life study centered on genotype 2 patients with well-compensated cirrhosis, sofosbuvir-based regimens were associated with good SVR and tolerability rates, regardless of previous antiviral treatments, without a significant impact of on treatment ribavirin dose reductions.

Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir plus Paritaprevir, Ritonavir and Ribavirin in Non-cirrhotic Treatment-naïve and Treatment-experienced Egyptians with Chronic HCV Genotype-4 Infection.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-GT4) is a risk factor for cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure. A combination of three new direct-acting antivirals ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir has been recommended for treatment of HCV-GT4 infection. The current study was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination plus ribavirin in non-cirrhotic, treatment-naïve and -experienced Egyptians with HCV-GT4 infection in a real-world setting. A total of 255 Egyptians with HCV-GT4 infection were enrolled, including 82 treatment-experienced and 173 treatment-naïve patients. All of them completed 12-week treatment protocol of ombitasvir, paritaprevir and ritonavir as an oral dose combination with ribavirin. Virological response (VR) was measured, as well as the biochemical parameters related to treatment efficacy and adverse events at baseline and after treatment, at 4 (VR4) and 12 (VR12) weeks post-treatment. The results showed that the VR4 rates were 98.8% in both groups, and VR12 rates were 97.7% and 96.3% in treatment-naïve and -experienced patients, respectively, with no significant differences found between the groups concerning VR4 (P=0.9) and VR12 (P=0.3). The most common adverse events were headache and fatigue, which were significantly more common (P=0.001 and 0.003, respectively) in treatment-experienced than in treatment-naïve group. The quadruple regimen was well-tolerated, and the reported adverse events were generally mild to moderate. This real-world setting study confirms that the combination of ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, and ribavirin is highly effective in the treatment of HCV- GT4 infection with a good safety and tolerability profile.

A phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study to assess the safety and efficacy of CKD-516, a novel vascular disrupting agent, in combination with Irinotecan in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Introduction The combination of an anti-angiogenic agent with cytotoxic chemotherapy is a standard treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer. CKD-516 is an oral vascular disrupting agent that was preliminarily shown to be safe and efficacious as a monotherapy in refractory solid cancers. We evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and preliminary efficacy of CKD-516 in combination with irinotecan in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods This phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study included patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. CKD-516 tablets were administered for five consecutive days followed by two days off in combination with intravenous irinotecan (120 mg/m2) administered on day one of each treatment cycle every two weeks. A traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. Results In total, 16 and 23 patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts, respectively. The most common adverse events included diarrhea (79%), nausea (74%), vomiting (67%), and neutropenia (62%). No dose-limiting toxicity occurred, and the recommended phase 2 dose was determined at CKD-516/irinotecan doses of 11/120 mg/m2. No cases of cardiac ischemia, cardiac dysfunction, or thromboembolism were reported. Among the 34 patients with available tumor response assessments, one patient achieved partial response (3%) and 26 patients achieved stable disease (76%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.1 and 11.6 months, respectively. Conclusion This phase 1 study showed that the combination of oral CKD-516 and irinotecan is safe and tolerable in metastatic, treatment-refractory colorectal patients and showed favorable efficacy outcomes. Further studies to confirm these preliminary findings are warranted. Trial registration number NCT03076957 (Registered at March 10, 2017).

Efficacy and safety of ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis (STORM-C-1): interim analysis of a two-stage, open-label, multicentre, single arm, phase 2/3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In low-income and middle-income countries, affordable direct-acting antivirals are urgently needed to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The combination of ravidasvir, a pangenotypic non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor, and sofosbuvir has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection. STORM-C-1 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir in a diverse population of adults chronically infected with HCV. METHODS: STORM-C-1 is a two-stage, open-label, phase 2/3 single-arm clinical trial in six public academic and non-academic centres in Malaysia and four public academic and non-academic centres in Thailand. Patients with HCV with compensated cirrhosis (Metavir F4 and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A) or without cirrhosis (Metavir F0-3) aged 18-69 years were eligible to participate, regardless of HCV genotype, HIV infection status, previous interferon-based HCV treatment, or source of HCV infection. Once daily ravidasvir (200 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) were prescribed for 12 weeks for patients without cirrhosis and for 24 weeks for those with cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12; defined as HCV RNA <12 IU/mL in Thailand and HCV RNA <15 IU/mL in Malaysia at 12 weeks after the end of treatment). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02961426, and the National Medical Research Register of Malaysia, NMRR-16-747-29183. FINDINGS: Between Sept 14, 2016, and June 5, 2017, 301 patients were enrolled in stage one of STORM-C-1. 98 (33%) patients had genotype 1a infection, 27 (9%) had genotype 1b infection, two (1%) had genotype 2 infection, 158 (52%) had genotype 3 infection, and 16 (5%) had genotype 6 infection. 81 (27%) patients had compensated cirrhosis, 90 (30%) had HIV co-infection, and 99 (33%) had received previous interferon-based treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were pyrexia (35 [12%]), cough (26 [9%]), upper respiratory tract infection (23 [8%]), and headache (20 [7%]). There were no deaths or treatment discontinuations due to serious adverse events related to study drugs. Of the 300 patients included in the full analysis set, 291 (97%; 95% CI 94-99) had SVR12. Of note, SVR12 was reported in 78 (96%) of 81 patients with cirrhosis and 153 (97%) of 158 patients with genotype 3 infection, including 51 (96%) of 53 patients with cirrhosis. There was no difference in SVR12 rates by HIV co-infection or previous interferon treatment. INTERPRETATION: In this first stage, ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir was effective and well tolerated in this diverse adult population of patients with chronic HCV infection. Ravidasvir plus sofosbuvir has the potential to provide an additional affordable, simple, and efficacious public health tool for large-scale implementation to eliminate HCV as a cause of morbidity and mortality. FUNDING: National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand; Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand; Ministry of Health, Malaysia; UK Aid; Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF); MSF Transformational Investment Capacity; FIND; Pharmaniaga; Starr International Foundation; Foundation for Art, Research, Partnership and Education; and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

Precipitating factors causing hyperbilirubinemia during chronic hepatitis C treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic decompensation is a fatal on-treatment side effect during chronic hepatitis C treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir (PrOD). Prompt bilirubin testing can reveal hepatic failure in susceptible patients, and clinical parameters precipitating early elevation of bilirubin can warn clinicians to avoid PrOD prescription. METHODS: This retrospective study included 169 Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-genotype 1b patients who underwent a 12-week course of PrOD with or without ribavirin. Laboratory data underwent χ analysis with Fisher's exact test to determine the precipitating factors causing hyperbilirubinemia in patients who had received 1 week of treatment. RESULTS: Sustained viral response was achieved in 164 patients (97.0%). Total bilirubin was ≥2 mg/dL (21.3%) in 36 patients after 1 week of treatment. Pretreatment white blood cell (WBC) <4500/µL and platelet <100,000/µL correlated with total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL (relative risk [RR]: 21.64, 95% CI: 5.23-89.64, p < 0.001) after 1 week of treatment. Pretreatment platelet ≥100 000/µL and WBC <4500/µL correlated with direct bilirubin ≥0.45 mg/dL (RR: 6.56, 95% CI: 1.42-30.38, p = 0.016) and indirect bilirubin ≥0.6 mg/dL (RR: 4.77, 95% CI: 1.03-22.15, p = 0.046). Pretreatment platelet <100,000/µL with F3/F4 fibrosis correlated with first week total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL (RR: 3.57, 95% CI: 1.35-9.09, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: PrOD is an effective antiviral regimen for HCV genotype 1b patients. Total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL after 1 week of treatment serves as an early warning of irreversible progression toward hepatic decompensation, and the current study provides a guide by which to monitor chronic hepatitis C patients undergoing PrOD treatment.

Cure or curd: Modification of lipid profiles and cardio-cerebrovascular events after hepatitis C virus eradication.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication deteriorates lipid profiles. Although HCV eradication may reduce the risk of vascular events as a whole, whether deteriorated lipid profiles increases the risk of cardio-cerebral disease in certain patients is elusive. Serial lipid profiles were measured before, during, at and 3 months after the end of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) therapy, and annually thereafter in chronic hepatitis C patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR, undetectable HCV RNA at posttreatment week 12). The primary end-point was the occurrence of the events. A total of 617 patients were included, with a mean follow-up period of 26.8 months (range: 1-65 months). The total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels increased significantly from treatment week 4 to 2 years after treatment. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the factors independently associated with a significant cholesterol increase included age (odds ratio [OR]/95% confidence intervals [CIs]:1.02/1.006-1.039, P = .007) and smoking (OR/CI:3.21/1.14-9.02, P = .027). Five patients developed cardio-cerebral diseases during 1376 person-years follow-up period. Compared to patients without vascular events, a significantly higher proportion of those with vascular events experienced an LDL-C surge >40% (80% vs 19.9%, P = .001). Cox-regression analysis revealed that an LDL-C surge >40% was the only factor predictive of vascular events (HR/CI: 15.44/1.73-138.20, P = .014). Dyslipidemia occurred after HCV eradication, and it was associated with the risk of cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. Attention should also be paid to the extrahepatic consequence beyond liver-related complications in the post-SVR era.

High sustained viral response rate in patients with hepatitis C using generic sofosbuvir and daclatasvir in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Safe and efficacious pan-genotypic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens, such as sofosbuvir and daclatasvir (SOF + DCV), facilitate simplified models of care for hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, in Cambodia access to HCV testing and treatment has typically been low. In response, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) implemented a HCV testing and treatment pilot project in Phnom Penh, Cambodia in 2016. This project provides the first real-world evidence of SOF + DCV effectiveness across a large patient cohort using a simplified care model in Cambodia. Patients treated with SOF + DCV from September 2016 to June 2019 were included in the analysis. Medical standard operational procedures (SOPs) were simplified significantly across the study period. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by sustained viral response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) according to a modified intention-to-treat methodology. Treatment safety was assessed by clinical outcome and occurrence of serious and nonserious adverse events (S/AE). Of 9158 patients, median age was 57 years and 39.6% were male. At baseline assessment, 27.2% of patients had compensated cirrhosis and 2.9% had decompensated cirrhosis. Genotype 6 was predominant (53.0%). Among patients analysed according to modified intention to treat (n = 8525), treatment effectiveness was high, with 97.2% of patients achieving SVR12. Occurrence of SAE was low (0.7%). Treatment effectiveness and safety was not affected by the iterative simplification to treatment modality. In conclusion, in this large treatment cohort in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, the SOF + DCV regimen showed high rates of treatment effectiveness and safety across patient sub-groups and during progressive simplification.