Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Microbiologic yields and complication rates of vitreous needle aspiration versus mechanized vitreous biopsy in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.
Han, D P; Wisniewski, S R; Kelsey, S F; Doft, B H; Barza, M; Pavan, P R.
Afiliación
  • Han DP; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Retina ; 19(2): 98-102, 1999.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10213233
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the microbiologic yields and complication rates associated with vitreous needle tap and vitreous biopsy in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS).

METHODS:

Of 420 EVS patients with postoperative endophthalmitis, 201 received immediate vitreous tap or biopsy (without pars plana vitrectomy) by random assignment and 193 completed 9-12 months of follow-up. Vitreous specimens were obtained by biopsy with a 20-gauge vitrectomy cutting instrument or by needle tap with a 22-27-gauge needle. If resistance to aspiration by needle tap was noted, a vitreous biopsy was performed.

RESULTS:

Of 201 patients undergoing tap or biopsy, 70 (35%) had needle tap, 127 (63%) had mechanized biopsy, and 4 (2%) had initial needle tap that was aborted to mechanized biopsy ("abort" eyes). Intraoperative hyphema occurred in 2 tap eyes (3%), 3 biopsy eyes (2%), and 0 (0%) abort eyes. Postoperative retinal detachment developed in 8 (11%) tap eyes, 10 (8%) biopsy eyes, and 0 (0%) abort eyes (not significant). Respective rates of culture and gram stain positivity were 69% and 42% in tap eyes and 66% and 41% in biopsy eyes (not significant). The rate of severe visual loss (final acuity <5/200) was significantly higher in tap eyes (16 eyes, 24%) compared with biopsy eyes (13 eyes, 11%) and abort eyes (0 eyes, 0%; P = 0.043). The difference was largely explained by the greater proportion of virulent organisms in the tap eyes compared with biopsy eyes. When visual acuity outcome was defined by other thresholds (20/40 and 20/100), the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study showed no significant differences between mechanized vitreous biopsy and needle tap with respect to microbiologic yield, operative complications, short-term (9-12 months) retinal detachment risk, or visual outcome. Choice of vitreous sampling procedure must depend on the clinical judgment of the surgeon.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Vitrectomía / Cuerpo Vítreo / Biopsia con Aguja / Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo / Drenaje / Endoftalmitis Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Retina Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Vitrectomía / Cuerpo Vítreo / Biopsia con Aguja / Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo / Drenaje / Endoftalmitis Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Retina Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos