Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial.
Am Heart J ; 152(6): 1042-50, 2006 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17161049
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Enoxaparin reduces ischemic events more effectively than unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients treated conservatively for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. The SYNERGY trial compared these agents in high-risk patients undergoing early invasive treatment. Enoxaparin was noninferior to UFH for the 30-day primary end point of death/myocardial infarction (MI), but modestly increased bleeding. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

This article compares the outcomes of the 4687 SYNERGY patients (47%) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, who were randomized to receive enoxaparin or UFH. Antithrombotic therapy was administered prerandomization in 78%. Crossover (usually in the catheterization laboratory) to the alternative antithrombotic occurred in 14.6% of enoxaparin patients and 2.9% of UFH-treated patients (P < .0001). Stenting was performed in 86.3%. Abrupt vessel closure occurred in 1.3% of enoxaparin patients and 1.7% of UFH-treated patients (P = .318). The rates of death/MI were similar at 30 days (13.1% with enoxaparin vs 14.2% with UFH, P = .289). GUSTO severe bleeding occurred with similar frequency in both groups (1.5% vs 1.6%, P = .688). TIMI major bleeding was more common with enoxaparin (3.7% vs 2.5% with UFH, P = .028). Transfusions were more frequent with enoxaparin than with UFH (6.8% vs 5.4%, P = .047). TIMI major bleeding increased with crossover from enoxaparin to UFH (from 3.7% to 7.8%) and from UFH to enoxaparin (from 2.5% to 8.6%). Statistical adjustment to model reasons for crossover did not affect the overall safety and efficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

In high-risk patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome, enoxaparin avoids the need for monitoring and achieves similar effectiveness to UFH but is associated with more bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heparina / Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón / Enoxaparina / Complejo GPIIb-IIIa de Glicoproteína Plaquetaria / Enfermedad Coronaria / Anticoagulantes Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am Heart J Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heparina / Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón / Enoxaparina / Complejo GPIIb-IIIa de Glicoproteína Plaquetaria / Enfermedad Coronaria / Anticoagulantes Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am Heart J Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda