Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dose monitoring using the DICOM structured report: assessment of the relationship between cumulative radiation exposure and BMI in abdominal CT.
Boos, J; Lanzman, R S; Meineke, A; Heusch, P; Sawicki, L M; Antoch, G; Kröpil, P.
Afiliación
  • Boos J; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: Johannes.Boos@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Lanzman RS; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Meineke A; Siemens AG, Regional Cluster Deutschland, Sector Healthcare, Germany.
  • Heusch P; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Sawicki LM; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Antoch G; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Kröpil P; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
Clin Radiol ; 70(2): 176-82, 2015 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25496824
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To perform a systematic, large-scale analysis using the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine structured report (DICOM-SR) to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and radiation exposure in abdominal CT. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of DICOM-SR of 3121 abdominal CT examinations between April 2013 and March 2014 was performed. All examinations were conducted using a 128 row CT system. Patients (mean age 61 ± 15 years) were divided into five groups according to their BMI group A <20 kg/m(2) (underweight), group B 20-25 kg/m(2) (normal weight), group C 25-30 kg/m(2) (overweight), group D 30-35 kg/m(2) (obese), and group E > 35 kg/m(2) (extremely obese). CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were compared between all groups and matched to national diagnostic reference values.

RESULTS:

The mean CTDIvol and DLP were 5.4 ± 2.9 mGy and 243 ± 153 mGy.cm in group A, 6 ± 3.6 mGy and 264 ± 179 mGy.cm in group B, 7 ± 3.6 mGy and 320 ± 180 mGy.cm in group C, 8.1 ± 5.2 mGy and 375 ± 306 mGy.cm in group D, and 10 ± 8 mGy and 476 ± 403 mGy.cm in group E, respectively. Except for group A versus group B, CTDIvol and DLP differed significantly between all groups (p<0.05). Significantly more CTDIvol values exceeded national diagnostic reference values in groups D and E (2.1% and 6.3%) compared to group B (0.5%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION:

DICOM-SR is a comprehensive, fast, and reproducible way to analyse dose-related data at CT. It allows for automated evaluation of radiation dose in a large study population. Dose exposition is related to the patient's BMI and is increased by up to 96% for extremely obese patients undergoing abdominal CT.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Radiografía Abdominal / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Índice de Masa Corporal / Monitoreo de Radiación / Sistemas de Información Radiológica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Radiol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Radiografía Abdominal / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Índice de Masa Corporal / Monitoreo de Radiación / Sistemas de Información Radiológica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Radiol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article