Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is the anesthesiologist necessary in the endoscopy suite? A review of patients, payers and safety.
Birk, John; Bath, Roopjeet Kaur.
Afiliación
  • Birk J; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(7): 883-5, 2015 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25979248
ABSTRACT
The use of propofol for sedation during endoscopy has been increasing, particularly given its association with superior patient satisfaction. Propofol sedation may also allow for higher quality endoscopy exams, increased efficiency of endoscopy suites and most particularly, permit better patient compliance with colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. However, propofol is typically provided by anesthesia specialists via monitored anesthesia care, and is associated with significant economic burden. Given the increasing use of monitored anesthesia care, which adds significant costs to endoscopy, payers are likely to react with changes in payer policies. One alternative to monitored anesthesia care is non-anesthesiologist administered propofol, which due to safety concerns and a lack of reimbursement has not been widely adopted in the US.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol / Colonoscopía / Anestésicos Intravenosos / Seguridad del Paciente / Anestesiología Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol / Colonoscopía / Anestésicos Intravenosos / Seguridad del Paciente / Anestesiología Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos