Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides.
Guha, Neela; Guyton, Kathryn Z; Loomis, Dana; Barupal, Dinesh Kumar.
Afiliación
  • Guha N; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme, Lyon, France.
Environ Health Perspect ; 124(12): 1823-1829, 2016 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27164621
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Identifying cancer hazards is the first step towards cancer prevention. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme, which has evaluated nearly 1,000 agents for their carcinogenic potential since 1971, typically selects agents for hazard identification on the basis of public nominations, expert advice, published data on carcinogenicity, and public health importance.

OBJECTIVES:

Here, we present a novel and complementary strategy for identifying agents for hazard evaluation using chemoinformatics, database integration, and automated text mining.

DISCUSSION:

To inform selection among a broad range of pesticides nominated for evaluation, we identified and screened nearly 6,000 relevant chemical structures, after which we systematically compiled information on 980 pesticides, creating network maps that allowed cluster visualization by chemical similarity, pesticide class, and publicly available information concerning cancer epidemiology, cancer bioassays, and carcinogenic mechanisms. For the IARC Monograph meetings that took place in March and June 2015, this approach supported high-priority evaluation of glyphosate, malathion, parathion, tetrachlorvinphos, diazinon, p,p'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), lindane, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D).

CONCLUSIONS:

This systematic approach, accounting for chemical similarity and overlaying multiple data sources, can be used by risk assessors as well as by researchers to systematize, inform, and increase efficiency in selecting and prioritizing agents for hazard identification, risk assessment, regulation, or further investigation. This approach could be extended to an array of outcomes and agents, including occupational carcinogens, drugs, and foods. Citation Guha N, Guyton KZ, Loomis D, Barupal DK. 2016. Prioritizing chemicals for risk assessment using chemoinformatics examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides. Environ Health Perspect 1241823-1829; http//dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP186.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plaguicidas / Carcinógenos / Sustancias Peligrosas / Salud Pública / Informática / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Environ Health Perspect Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plaguicidas / Carcinógenos / Sustancias Peligrosas / Salud Pública / Informática / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Environ Health Perspect Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia