Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cross-sectional study on factors hampering implementation of measles pre- and postexposure measures in Dutch hospitals during the 2013-2014 measles outbreak.
Fievez, L C R; Wong, A; Ruijs, W L M; Meerstadt-Rombach, F S; Timen, A.
Afiliación
  • Fievez LCR; Department of Communicable Disease Control, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; National Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Electronic address: lfievez@ggd.amsterdam.n
  • Wong A; Department of Statistics, Informatics and Modeling, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Ruijs WLM; National Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Meerstadt-Rombach FS; National Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Timen A; National Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(7): 750-755, 2017 Jul 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28526305
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study examined adherence to national recommendations on measles pre- and postexposure measures, including immunization of health care workers (HCWs) in Dutch hospitals, during a national outbreak of measles in The Netherlands. This study also investigated which hospital characteristics and organizational issues hamper implementation.

METHODS:

This was a cross-sectional survey among all general and academic hospitals in The Netherlands. An online structured questionnaire (48 questions) was administered. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

RESULTS:

Of 88 hospitals, 70 (79.5%) were included. Of 68 hospitals, 48 (70.6%) assessed susceptibility to measles in HCWs. Of 70 hospitals, 61 (87.1%) offered vaccination to susceptible HCWs. Of 63 hospitals, 42 (66.7%) had postexposure policies consistent with national recommendations. Of 62 hospitals, 30 (48.4%) implemented all these measures, which is the minimum set of measures considered necessary to adequately prevent measles in HCWs. Logistic regression suggests that hospitals with several locations, hospitals with more employees, and hospitals where infectious disease experts designed infection prevention policies while occupational health experts implemented the policy less often implemented this minimum set of measures (P < .001, P < .01, and P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

During a national measles outbreak, most hospitals took measures to prevent measles in HCWs, but less than half implemented the minimum set of measures required. Implementation strategies in hospitals need to be improved, especially in large-sized hospitals and hospitals with several locations, and with respect to the assignment of responsibilities for infection prevention policies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Brotes de Enfermedades / Control de Infecciones / Personal de Salud / Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa / Sarampión Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Brotes de Enfermedades / Control de Infecciones / Personal de Salud / Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa / Sarampión Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article