Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma: final overall survival results of the randomized BRIM-3 study.
Chapman, P B; Robert, C; Larkin, J; Haanen, J B; Ribas, A; Hogg, D; Hamid, O; Ascierto, P A; Testori, A; Lorigan, P C; Dummer, R; Sosman, J A; Flaherty, K T; Chang, I; Coleman, S; Caro, I; Hauschild, A; McArthur, G A.
Afiliación
  • Chapman PB; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. Electronic address: chapmanp@mskcc.org.
  • Robert C; Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy and Paris Sud University, Paris, France.
  • Larkin J; Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Haanen JB; Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ribas A; Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
  • Hogg D; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Hamid O; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Melanoma Therapeutics, Los Angeles, USA.
  • Ascierto PA; Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples.
  • Testori A; Melanoma and Sarcoma, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.
  • Lorigan PC; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Dummer R; Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Sosman JA; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.
  • Flaherty KT; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  • Chang I; Department of Biostatistics in Product Development, Biometrics, South San Francisco, USA.
  • Coleman S; Clinical Department, Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
  • Caro I; Product Development, Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
  • Hauschild A; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • McArthur GA; Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia; Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Ann Oncol ; 28(10): 2581-2587, 2017 Oct 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28961848
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The BRIM-3 trial showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for vemurafenib compared with dacarbazine in treatment-naive patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. We present final OS data from BRIM-3. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients were randomly assigned in a 1  1 ratio to receive vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). OS and PFS were co-primary end points. OS was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, with and without censoring of data for dacarbazine patients who crossed over to vemurafenib.

RESULTS:

Between 4 January 2010 and 16 December 2010, a total of 675 patients were randomized to vemurafenib (n = 337) or dacarbazine (n = 338, of whom 84 crossed over to vemurafenib). At the time of database lock (14 August 2015), median OS, censored at crossover, was significantly longer for vemurafenib than for dacarbazine {13.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.0-15.4] versus 9.7 months [95% CI 7.9-12.8; hazard ratio (HR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.67-0.98]; P = 0.03}, as was median OS without censoring at crossover [13.6 months (95% CI 12.0-15.4) versus 10.3 months (95% CI 9.1-12.8); HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.96); P = 0.01]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS rates for vemurafenib versus dacarbazine were 56% versus 46%, 30% versus 24%, 21% versus 19% and 17% versus 16% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Overall, 173 of the 338 patients (51%) in the dacarbazine arm and 175 of the 337 (52%) of those in the vemurafenib arm received subsequent anticancer therapies, most commonly ipilimumab. Safety data were consistent with the primary analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Vemurafenib continues to be associated with improved median OS in the BRIM-3 trial after extended follow-up. OS curves converged after ≈3 years, likely as a result of crossover from dacarbazine to vemurafenib and receipt of subsequent anticancer therapies. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NCT01006980.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Sulfonamidas / Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf / Indoles / Melanoma / Mutación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Sulfonamidas / Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf / Indoles / Melanoma / Mutación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article