Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease Despite Weekly Preemptive CMV Strategy for Recipients of Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Lodding, I P; da Cunha Bang, C; Sørensen, S S; Gustafsson, F; Iversen, M; Kirkby, N; Perch, M; Rasmussen, A; Sengeløv, H; Mocroft, A; Lundgren, J D.
Afiliación
  • Lodding IP; Centre for Health, Immunity and Infectious Diseases (CHIP), Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • da Cunha Bang C; Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Sørensen SS; Department of Nephrology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Gustafsson F; Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Iversen M; Department of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Kirkby N; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Perch M; Department of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Rasmussen A; Abdominal Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Sengeløv H; Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Mocroft A; Institute for Global Health, Infection and Population Health, University College of London, United Kingdom.
  • Lundgren JD; Centre for Health, Immunity and Infectious Diseases (CHIP), Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 5(5): ofy080, 2018 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29876364
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transplant recipients presenting with cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease at the time of diagnosis of CMV DNAemia pose a challenge to a preemptive CMV management strategy. However, the rate and risk factors of such failure remain uncertain.

METHODS:

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients with a first episode of CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) DNAemia within the first year posttransplantation were evaluated (n = 335). Patient records were reviewed for presence of CMV disease at the time of CMV DNAemia diagnosis. The distribution and prevalence of CMV disease were estimated, and the odds ratio (OR) of CMV disease was modeled using logistic regression.

RESULTS:

The prevalence of CMV disease increased for both SOT and HSCT with increasing diagnostic CMV PCR load and with screening intervals >14 days. The only independent risk factor in multivariate analysis was increasing CMV DNAemia load of the diagnostic CMV PCR (OR = 6.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-18.11). Among recipients receiving weekly screening (n = 147), 16 (10.8%) had CMV disease at the time of diagnosis of CMV DNAemia (median DNAemia load 628 IU/mL; interquartile range, 432-1274); 93.8% of these cases were HSCT and lung transplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite application of weekly screening intervals, HSCT and lung transplant recipients in particular presented with CMV disease at the time of diagnosis of CMV DNAemia. Additional research to improve the management of patients at risk of presenting with CMV disease at low levels of CMV DNAemia and despite weekly screening is warranted.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Open Forum Infect Dis Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Open Forum Infect Dis Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca