Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized trial of human C1 inhibitor prophylaxis in children with hereditary angioedema.
Aygören-Pürsün, Emel; Soteres, Daniel F; Nieto-Martinez, Sandra A; Christensen, Jim; Jacobson, Kraig W; Moldovan, Dumitru; Van Leerberghe, Arthur; Tang, Yongqiang; Lu, Peng; Vardi, Moshe; Schranz, Jennifer; Martinez-Saguer, Inmaculada.
Afiliación
  • Aygören-Pürsün E; Department for Children and Adolescents, Angioedema Centre, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Soteres DF; Asthma and Allergy Associates P.C., Colorado Springs, Colorado.
  • Nieto-Martinez SA; Genetics Unit of Nutrition, National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Christensen J; Nevada Access to Research & Education Society, Las Vegas, Nevada.
  • Jacobson KW; Oregon Allergy Associates, Allergy and Asthma Research Group, Eugene, Oregon.
  • Moldovan D; Mures County Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
  • Van Leerberghe A; Shire, a Takeda Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.
  • Tang Y; Shire, a Takeda Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.
  • Lu P; Shire, a Takeda Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.
  • Vardi M; Shire, a Takeda Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.
  • Schranz J; Shire, a Takeda Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.
  • Martinez-Saguer I; HRZM Hemophilia Center Rhein Main, Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 30(5): 553-561, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30968444
BACKGROUND: Patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction have burdensome recurrent angioedema attacks. The safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) prophylaxis (intravenously administered) in patients aged 6-11 years were investigated. METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled in a randomized, single-blind, crossover, phase 3 trial. After a 12-week baseline observation period (BOP), patients received 500 or 1000 U C1-INH, twice weekly, for 12 weeks before crossing over to the alternate dose for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end-point was the monthly normalized number of angioedema attacks (NNA). HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQoL 5-dimensional descriptive system youth version and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). RESULTS: Twelve randomized patients had a median (range) age of 10.0 (7-11) years. Mean (SD) percentage reduction in monthly NNA from BOP was 71.1% (27.1%) with 500 U and 84.5% (20.0%) with 1000 U C1-INH. Mean (SD) within-patient difference (-0.4 [0.58]) for monthly NNA with both doses was significant (P = 0.035 [90% CI, -0.706 to -0.102]). Cumulative attack severity, cumulative daily severity, and number of acute attacks treated were reduced. No serious adverse events or discontinuations occurred. Mean EQ-VAS change from BOP to week 9 of treatment (500 U C1-INH, 10.4; 1000 U C1-INH, 21.6) was greater than the minimal important difference, indicating a meaningful HRQoL change. CONCLUSIONS: C1-INH prophylaxis was effective, safe, and well tolerated in children aged 6-11 years experiencing recurrent angioedema attacks. A post hoc analysis indicated a meaningful improvement in HRQoL with C1-INH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02052141.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteína Inhibidora del Complemento C1 / Angioedemas Hereditarios Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteína Inhibidora del Complemento C1 / Angioedemas Hereditarios Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania