Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Exeter Short Revision Stem for Cement-in-Cement Femoral Revision: A Five to Twelve Year Review.
Woodbridge, Adam B; Hubble, Matthew J; Whitehouse, Sarah L; Wilson, Matthew J; Howell, Jonathan R; Timperley, Andrew J.
Afiliación
  • Woodbridge AB; Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  • Hubble MJ; Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  • Whitehouse SL; Department of Orthopaedic Research, Queensland University of Technology, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Wilson MJ; Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  • Howell JR; Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  • Timperley AJ; Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(7S): S297-S301, 2019 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31000404
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cement-in-cement femoral revision is a proven technique in revision total hip arthroplasty, with excellent results reported using standard-sized Exeter stems. The Exeter 44/00/125 short revision stem was introduced in 2004 to facilitate cement-in-cement revision. The stem is 25-mm shorter and has a slimmer body than standard stems to facilitate adjustment of depth of insertion and stem version. It is not known if this change in stem size affects its long-term performance. We therefore reviewed the outcome of all Exeter short revision stems used for cement-in-cement revision in our unit, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.

METHOD:

One hundred sixty-six cases were performed between 2004 and 2010. Mean follow-up of surviving patients was 8.1 years (range 5.0-11.7). The fate of all 166 hips were known and included in the survival analysis.

RESULTS:

Median clinical scores improved significantly. Sixteen hips required re-revision (infection 6, loose cup 3, periprosthetic fracture 3, instability 2, stem fracture with chronic infection 1, and pain 1). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 10 years revealed 100% survival for aseptic stem loosening, 96.8% survival for stem failure, and 88.9% survival for all causes.

CONCLUSION:

The Exeter short revision stem performed as well as standard length stems for cement-in-cement revision in this the largest and longest review of their use. Larger registry-based studies may provide additional information on the performance of this stem.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reoperación / Cementos para Huesos / Prótesis de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reoperación / Cementos para Huesos / Prótesis de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido