Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Type 2 diabetes remission: economic evaluation of the DiRECT/Counterweight-Plus weight management programme within a primary care randomized controlled trial.
Xin, Y; Davies, A; McCombie, L; Briggs, A; Messow, C-M; Grieve, E; Leslie, W S; Taylor, R; Lean, M E J.
Afiliación
  • Xin Y; Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Davies A; Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • McCombie L; Human Nutrition, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Briggs A; Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Messow CM; Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Grieve E; Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Leslie WS; Human Nutrition, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Taylor R; Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Lean MEJ; Human Nutrition, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Diabet Med ; 36(8): 1003-1012, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31026353
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The Counterweight-Plus weight management programme achieved 46% remission of Type 2 diabetes at 1 year in the DiRECT trial. We estimated the implementation costs of the Counterweight-Plus programme and its 1-year cost-effectiveness in terms of diabetes remission, compared with usual care, from the UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective.

METHODS:

Within-trial total costs included programme set-up and running costs (practitioner appointment visits, low-energy formula diet sachets and training), oral anti-diabetes and anti-hypertensive medications, and healthcare contacts. Total costs were calculated for aggregated resource use for each participant and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were based on 1000 non-parametric bootstrap iterations.

RESULTS:

One-year programme costs under trial conditions were estimated at £1137 per participant (95% CI £1071, £1205). The intervention led to a significant cost-saving of £120 (95% CI £78, £163) for the oral anti-diabetes drugs and £14 (95% CI £7.9, £22) for anti-hypertensive medications compared with the control. Deducting the cost-savings of all healthcare contacts from the intervention cost resulted an incremental cost of £982 (95% CI £732, £1258). Cost per 1 year of diabetes remission was £2359 (95% CI £1668, £3250).

CONCLUSIONS:

Remission of Type 2 diabetes within 1-year can be achieved at a cost below the annual cost of diabetes (including complications). Providing a reasonable proportion of remissions can be maintained over time, with multiple medical gains expected, as well as immediate social benefits, there is a case for shifting resources within diabetes care budgets to offer support for people with Type 2 diabetes to attempt remission. (Clinical Trial Registry No. ISRCTN03267836).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Programas de Reducción de Peso Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabet Med Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Programas de Reducción de Peso Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabet Med Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido