Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification of endometrial cancers and atypical hyperplasia: Development and validation of a simplified system for ultrasound scoring of endometrial pattern.
Dueholm, M; Hjorth, I M D; Dahl, K; Pedersen, L K; Ørtoft, G.
Afiliación
  • Dueholm M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark. Electronic address: dueholm@dadlnet.dk.
  • Hjorth IMD; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
  • Dahl K; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
  • Pedersen LK; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Ørtoft G; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, City, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maturitas ; 123: 15-24, 2019 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31027672
OBJECTIVES: To derive and validate a practical scoring system for identification of endometrial cancer (EC) or atypical hyperplasia (AH) using transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) and gel infusion sonography (GIS) in women with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB). STUDY DESIGN: Endometrial pattern was correlated with endometrial pathology in consecutive women with PMB in both a derivation study (N = 164) and a validation study (N = 711). Logistic regression was used to derive and validate two scoring systems (A and B) for prediction of EC/AH: scoring system A was Doppler score + interrupted endo-myometrial junction (IEJ) (2 points); and scoring system B was Doppler score + IEJ (1 point) + Irregular Endometrial Outline (IESO) by GIS (1 point); the Doppler score was based on the presence of more than one single or double vessel (1 point) + multiple vessels (1 point) + large vessels (1 point). OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic performance and calibration curves for identification of EC/AH. RESULTS: Both scoring systems had good observer agreement. VALIDATION DATA: Scoring was most effective with endometrial thickness (ET) ≥ 8 mm. Both scoring systems were well calibrated and performed satisfactorily in women with ET ≥ 8 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of a score of ≥ 2 points in system A were 92% and 84%; the respective values were 89% and 88% in system B. CONCLUSIONS: Scoring was highly efficient in identifying EC/AH. Four risk groups of EC/AH may guide the management of women with PMB: very low (ET < 4 mm), low (ET 4-7.9 mm), intermediate (ET ≥ 8 mm and score < 2 points) and high risk (ET ≥ 8 mm and score ≥ 2 points).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Endometriales / Posmenopausia / Carcinoma Endometrioide / Hiperplasia Endometrial / Endometrio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Maturitas Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Endometriales / Posmenopausia / Carcinoma Endometrioide / Hiperplasia Endometrial / Endometrio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Maturitas Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article