Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of coated meshes for intraperitoneal placement in animal studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu, H; van Steensel, S; Gielen, M; Vercoulen, T; Melenhorst, J; Winkens, B; Bouvy, N D.
Afiliación
  • Liu H; Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. h.liu@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • van Steensel S; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. h.liu@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • Gielen M; Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Vercoulen T; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Melenhorst J; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Winkens B; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Bouvy ND; Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hernia ; 24(6): 1253-1261, 2020 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31659548
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh in hernia repair can result in adhesions leading to intestinal obstruction and fistulation. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the effects of mesh coatings reducing the tissue-to-mesh adhesion in animal studies. METHODS: Pubmed and Embase were systematically searched. Animal experiments comparing intraperitoneally placed meshes with coatings were eligible for inclusion. Only studies with comparable follow-up, measurements, and species were included for data pooling and subsequent meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 131 articles met inclusion criteria, with four studies integrated into one comparison and five studies integrated into another comparison. Compared to uncoated polypropylene (PP) mesh, PP mesh coated with hyaluronic acid/carboxymethyl cellulose (HA/CMC) showed significantly reduced adhesion formation at follow-up of 4 weeks measured with adhesion score of extent (random effects model, mean difference,- 0.96, 95% CI - 1.32 to - 0.61, P < 0.001, I2 = 23%; fixed effects model, mean difference,- 0.94, 95% CI - 1.25 to - 0.63, P < 0.001, I2 = 23%). Compared to PP mesh, polyester mesh coated with collagen (PC mesh) showed no significant difference at follow-up of 4 weeks regarding percentage of adhesion-area on a mesh, using random effects model (mean difference - 11.69, 95% CI - 44.14 to 20.76, P = 0.48, I2 = 92%). However, this result differed using fixed effects model (mean difference - 25.55, 95% CI - 33.70 to - 7.40, P < 0.001, I2 = 92%). CONCLUSION: HA/CMC coating reduces adhesion formation to PP mesh effectively at a follow-up of 4 weeks, while the anti-adhesive properties of PC mesh are inclusive comparing all study data.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mallas Quirúrgicas / Herniorrafia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Hernia Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mallas Quirúrgicas / Herniorrafia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Hernia Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos