Propensity score-based comparison of survival and radiation pneumonitis after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes and radiation pneumonitis (RP) between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT). METHODS: Clinical characteristics and dose-volume histogram parameters were collected for 388 EC patients who received definitive CRT with either IMRT (n = 297) or 3DCRT (n = 91) from 2010 through 2017. Dosimetric parameters, survival end-points, and symptomatic RP (grade ≥2) were compared between groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance potential confounding factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to identify predictors of RP. RESULTS: Compared with 3DCRT, IMRT was significantly associated with better overall survival (OS; P = 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.008), and distant metastasis-free survival (P = 0.011), but not with locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.721). Moreover, IMRT demonstrated a remarkably lower risk of RP than 3DCRT (5.4% vs 23.1%, P < 0.001). PSM analysis further confirmed the clinical benefit of IMRT. In the matched cohort, radiation modality was independently correlated with OS and PFS. On multivariate analysis, smoking history (odds ratio [OR] 4.225, P = 0.002), primary tumor length (OR 2.764, P = 0.049), radiation modality (OR 10.760, P < 0.001), planning target volume (OR 1.004, P < 0.001), and lung V20 (OR 1.286, P = 0.002) were found to be significant predictors of RP. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 3DCRT, IMRT was associated with more favorable survival and a reduced risk of RP after definitive CRT, supporting the routine use of IMRT for EC.