Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
Sharma, Aditya Prakash; Narain, Tushar Aditya; Devana, Sudheer Kumar; Tyagi, Shantanu; Parmar, Kalpesh M; Bora, Girdhar Singh; Mavuduru, Ravimohan S; Singh, Shrawan Kumar.
Afiliación
  • Sharma AP; Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
  • Narain TA; Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
  • Devana SK; Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
  • Tyagi S; Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
  • Parmar KM; Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
  • Bora GS; Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
  • Mavuduru RS; Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
  • Singh SK; Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Urol ; 36(2): 117-122, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32549663
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Ambispective observational study was undertaken from July 2002 to August 2019 which included patients admitted with a history of trauma to the penis in the erect state. The clinical presentation, etiology and the details of the surgical management were noted. Patients were contacted telephonically and were called for follow-up. They were evaluated for the presence of penile nodules or curvature, and the erectile function was objectively recorded using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS).

RESULTS:

Median age at injury was 37 years, and injury during the sexual intercourse (33/43) was the most common etiology. Five patients presented with blood at the meatus. Ultrasound was performed in 27 patients and could detect the injury with a 55% sensitivity. All but one case were repaired through a subcoronal degloving incision. At a median follow-up of 36 months, follow-up data of 20 patients were available. Of the 20 patients, 14 were sexually active. The mean SHIM score was 21.36 ± 1.33 and the mean EHS was 3.21 ± 0.43. Four of the 20 patients developed penile nodule while 2 of them had penile curvature which was not bothersome.

CONCLUSION:

Penile fracture remains primarily a clinical diagnosis. Although prompt diagnosis and an emergent surgical exploration provides good outcomes in terms of preservation of erectile function, patients should be apprised about the problems of penile nodule and curvature.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Urol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Urol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India