Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial.
Satava, Richard M; Stefanidis, Dimitrios; Levy, Jeffrey S; Smith, Roger; Martin, John R; Monfared, Sara; Timsina, Lava R; Darzi, Ara Wardkes; Moglia, Andrea; Brand, Timothy C; Dorin, Ryan P; Dumon, Kristoffel R; Francone, Todd D; Georgiou, Evangelos; Goh, Alvin C; Marcet, Jorge E; Martino, Martin A; Sudan, Ranjan; Vale, Justin; Gallagher, Anthony G.
Afiliación
  • Satava RM; Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
  • Stefanidis D; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Levy JS; Department of Ob/Gyn, Drexel University College of Medicine, Institute of Surgical Excellence, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Smith R; Florida Hospital Nicholson Center, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Celebration, FL.
  • Martin JR; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Monfared S; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Timsina LR; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Darzi AW; Department of Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Moglia A; EndoCAS Simulation Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • Brand TC; Andersen Simulation Center, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA.
  • Dorin RP; Center for Education, Simulation and Innovation, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT.
  • Dumon KR; Penn Medicine Clinical Simulation Center, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Francone TD; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Health and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.
  • Georgiou E; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Goh AC; Houston Methodist Hospital, Methodist Institute for Technology, Innovation, and Education, Houston, TX.
  • Marcet JE; USF Health Center for Advanced Medical Learning and Simulation, Tampa, FL.
  • Martino MA; Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA.
  • Sudan R; Department of Surgery, Surgical Education and Activities Lab, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
  • Vale J; EndoCAS Simulation Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • Gallagher AG; Technology Enhanced Learning, ASSERT Centre, College of Medicine and Health, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ann Surg ; 272(2): 384-392, 2020 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675553
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To demonstrate the noninferiority of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum over current training paradigms and identify an ideal training platform. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA There is currently no validated, uniformly accepted curriculum for training in robotic surgery skills.

METHODS:

Single-blinded parallel-group randomized trial at 12 international American College of Surgeons (ACS) Accredited Education Institutes (AEI). Thirty-three robotic surgery experts and 123 inexperienced surgical trainees were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Benchmarks (proficiency levels) on the 7 FRS Dome tasks were established based on expert performance. Participants were then randomly assigned to 4 training groups Dome (n = 29), dV-Trainer (n = 30), and DVSS (n = 32) that trained to benchmarks and control (n = 32) that trained using locally available robotic skills curricula. The primary outcome was participant performance after training based on task errors and duration on 5 basic robotic tasks (knot tying, continuous suturing, cutting, dissection, and vessel coagulation) using an avian tissue model (transfer-test). Secondary outcomes included cognitive test scores, GEARS ratings, and robot familiarity checklist scores.

RESULTS:

All groups demonstrated significant performance improvement after skills training (P < 0.01). Participating residents and fellows performed tasks faster (DOME and DVSS groups) and with fewer errors than controls (DOME group; P < 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was high for the checklist scores (0.82-0.97) but moderate for GEARS ratings (0.40-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS:

We provide evidence of effectiveness for the FRS curriculum by demonstrating better performance of those trained following FRS compared with controls on a transfer test. We therefore argue for its implementation across training programs before surgeons apply these skills clinically.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Especialidades Quirúrgicas / Simulación por Computador / Competencia Clínica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados / Entrenamiento Simulado Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Especialidades Quirúrgicas / Simulación por Computador / Competencia Clínica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados / Entrenamiento Simulado Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article