Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic latero-abdominal colposuspension: Description of the technique, advantages and preliminary results. / Colposuspensión latero-abdominal laparoscópica: descripción, ventajas y resultados preliminares.
Baldissera Aradas, J V; Polo Hernández, R; Merenciano, F; Amat, M; Climent, P; Ferrero Doria, R.
Afiliación
  • Baldissera Aradas JV; Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Dénia-Marina Salud, Dénia, Alicante, España. Electronic address: baldissera758@gmail.com.
  • Polo Hernández R; Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Dénia-Marina Salud, Dénia, Alicante, España.
  • Merenciano F; Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Dénia-Marina Salud, Dénia, Alicante, España.
  • Amat M; Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Dénia-Marina Salud, Dénia, Alicante, España.
  • Climent P; Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Dénia-Marina Salud, Dénia, Alicante, España.
  • Ferrero Doria R; Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Dénia-Marina Salud, Dénia, Alicante, España.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 45(2): 167-174, 2021 Mar.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032847
INTRODUCTION: There are currently various fixation or suspension techniques for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. Laparoscopic colposacropexy is considered the gold standard. We present the surgical steps of the laparoscopic latero-abdominal colposuspension (LACS) technique and the preliminary results obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with anterior and/or apical compartment symptomatic POP undergoing LACS are included. The Baden-Walker scale, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OAB-q SF), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale were used to assess the degree of prolapse, urinary filling and sexual symptoms and the level of satisfaction before and after surgery, respectively. Conventional laparoscopic material and a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh were used. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included with a minimum follow-up time of 6months. The mean surgical time was 70.3±23.8min. Anatomic correction of prolapse was seen in all cases. Only one recurrence was detected. High levels of patient satisfaction were achieved. CONCLUSION: LACS allowed the anatomical reconstruction of the pelvic floor and proved to be a minimally invasive, fast, effective, safe and reproducible technique. More series are needed to evaluate its role against laparoscopic colposacropexy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En / Es Revista: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En / Es Revista: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article