Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficiency of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiating radiologically similar simple and type I hydatid cysts of the liver.
Dundar, Ilyas; Ozgokce, Mesut; Durmaz, Fatma; Ozkacmaz, Sercan; Turkoglu, Saim; Goya, Cemil.
Afiliación
  • Dundar I; Department of Radiology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.
  • Ozgokce M; Department of Radiology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.
  • Durmaz F; Department of Radiology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.
  • Ozkacmaz S; Department of Radiology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.
  • Turkoglu S; Department of Radiology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.
  • Goya C; Department of Radiology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.
Acta Radiol ; 63(2): 143-148, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33478235
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Determining the nature of purely cystic hepatic lesions is essential because different kinds have different follow-ups, treatment options, and complications.

PURPOSE:

To explore the potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the differentiation of type I hydatid cysts (HC) and simple liver cysts (SLC), which have similar radiological appearances. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

This single-center prospective study was conducted during 2016-2019. Round, homogenous, anechoic liver cysts >1 cm were classified according to at least two years of imaging follow-up, radiological features, serology, as well as puncture aspiration injection reaspiration procedure and pathology results. ADC values of 95 cysts (50 type I HCs and 45 SLCs) were calculated on DWI. The differences in ADC values were analyzed by independent t-test.

RESULTS:

Of 51 patients, 28 were female, 23 were male (mean age 32.07 ± 22.95 years; age range 5-82 years). Mean diameter of 45 SLCs was 2.59 ± 1.23 cm (range 1.2-7.6 cm) and ADCmean value was 3.03 ± 0.47 (range 2.64-5.85) while mean diameter of 50 type I HCs was 7.49 ± 2.95 cm (range 2.8-14 cm) and ADCmean value was 2.99 ± 0.29 (range 2.36-3.83). There was no statistically significant difference in ADC values between type I HCs and SLCs.

CONCLUSION:

Some studies report that ADC values of type I HCs are statistically significantly lower than those of SLCs. Others suggest no significant difference. In our study with a higher number of cases, using ADC parameters similar to those in previous studies, we did not find any statistically significant difference.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quistes / Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética / Equinococosis Hepática / Hepatopatías Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quistes / Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética / Equinococosis Hepática / Hepatopatías Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía