Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of contributing factors of and solutions to electronic health record-related impacts on physician well-being.
Nguyen, Oliver T; Jenkins, Nyasia J; Khanna, Neel; Shah, Shivani; Gartland, Alexander J; Turner, Kea; Merlo, Lisa J.
Afiliación
  • Nguyen OT; Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Jenkins NJ; Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Khanna N; Department of Patient Administration, Navy Medical Service Corps, U.S. Navy, Okinawa, Japan.
  • Shah S; Department of Health Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Gartland AJ; College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Turner K; College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  • Merlo LJ; Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 28(5): 974-984, 2021 04 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517382
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Physicians often describe the electronic health record (EHR) as a cumbersome impediment to meaningful work, which has important implications for physician well-being. This systematic review (1) assesses organizational, physician, and information technology factors associated with EHR-related impacts on physician well-being; and (2) highlights potential improvements to EHR form and function, as recommended by frontline physicians. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases were searched for literature describing EHR use by physicians and markers of well-being.

RESULTS:

After reviewing 7388 article, 35 ultimately met the inclusion criteria. Multiple factors across all levels were associated with EHR-related well-being among physicians. Notable predictors amenable to interventions include (1) total EHR time, (2) after-hours EHR time, (3) on-site EHR support, (4) perceived EHR usability, (5) in-basket burden, and (6) documentation burden. Physician recommendations also echoed these themes.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are multiple complex factors involved in EHR-related well-being among physicians. Our review shows physicians have recommendations that span from federal regulations to organizational policies to EHR modifications. Future research should assess multipronged interventions that address these factors. As primary stakeholders, physicians should be included in the planning and implementation of such modifications to ensure compatibility with physician needs and clinical workflows.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Agotamiento Profesional / Registros Electrónicos de Salud Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Med Inform Assoc Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Agotamiento Profesional / Registros Electrónicos de Salud Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Med Inform Assoc Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos