Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of dual-headed pedicle screws on the biomechanics of lumbosacral junction multirod constructs.
Godzik, Jakub; de Andrada Pereira, Bernardo; Sawa, Anna G U; Lehrman, Jennifer N; Hlubek, Randall J; Kelly, Brian P; Turner, Jay D.
Afiliación
  • Godzik J; 1Department of Neurosurgery and.
  • de Andrada Pereira B; 2Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Sawa AGU; 2Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Lehrman JN; 2Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Hlubek RJ; 1Department of Neurosurgery and.
  • Kelly BP; 2Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Turner JD; 1Department of Neurosurgery and.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 34(5): 691-699, 2021 Feb 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33545680
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel connector design and compare it with traditional side connectors, such as a fixed-angle connector (FAC) and a variable-angle connector (VAC), with respect to lumbosacral stability and instrumentation strain.

METHODS:

Standard nondestructive flexibility tests (7.5 Nm) and compression tests (400 N) were performed using 7 human cadaveric specimens (L1-ilium) to compare range of motion (ROM) stability, posterior rod strain (RS), and sacral screw bending moment (SM). Directions of motion included flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, left and right axial rotation, and compression. Conditions included 1) the standard 2-rod construct (2R); 2) the dual-tulip head (DTH) with 4-rod construct (4R); 3) FACs with 4R; and 4) VACs with 4R. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA.

RESULTS:

Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in ROM across the lumbosacral junction among conditions (p > 0.07). Compared with 2R, DTH and FAC significantly reduced RS in extension, left axial rotation, and compression (p ≤ 0.03). VAC significantly decreased RS compared with 2R in flexion, extension, left axial rotation, right axial rotation, and compression (p ≤ 0.03), and significantly decreased RS compared with DTH in extension (p = 0.02). DTH was associated with increased SM in left and right axial rotation compared with 2R (p ≤ 0.003) and in left and right lateral bending and left and right axial rotation compared with FAC and VAC (p ≤ 0.02). FAC and VAC were associated with decreased SM compared with 2R in right and left lateral bending (p ≤ 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS:

RS across the lumbosacral junction can be high. Supplemental rod fixation with DTH is an effective strategy for reducing RS across the lumbosacral junction. However, the greatest reduction in RS and SM was achieved with a VAC that allowed for straight (uncontoured) accessory rod placement.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg Spine Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg Spine Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article