Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assume It Will Break: Parental Perspectives on Negative Communication Experiences in Pediatric Oncology.
Sisk, Bryan A; Zavadil, Jessica A; Blazin, Lindsay J; Baker, Justin N; Mack, Jennifer W; DuBois, James M.
Afiliación
  • Sisk BA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
  • Zavadil JA; Department of Pediatrics, St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, MO.
  • Blazin LJ; Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
  • Baker JN; Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
  • Mack JW; Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
  • DuBois JM; Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 17(6): e859-e871, 2021 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848191
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Communication breakdowns in pediatric oncology can have negative consequences for patients and families. A detailed analysis of these negative encounters will support clinicians in anticipating and responding to communication breakdowns.

METHODS:

Semistructured interviews with 80 parents of children with cancer across three academic medical centers during treatment, survivorship, or bereavement. We analyzed transcripts using semantic content analysis.

RESULTS:

Nearly all parents identified negative communication experiences (n = 76). We identified four categories of contributors to negative experiences individual (n = 68), team (n = 26), organization (n = 46), and greater health care system (n = 8). These experiences involved a variety of health care professionals across multiple specialties. Parents reported 12 personal consequences of communication breakdowns emotional distress (n = 65), insufficient understanding (n = 48), decreased trust or confidence (n = 37), inconvenience (n = 36), medical harm (n = 23), decreased self-confidence (n = 17), decreased emotional support (n = 13), decreased engagement (n = 9), false hope (n = 9), decreased hope (n = 7), financial insult (n = 7), and decreased access to resources (n = 3). We identified five categories of supportive responses from clinicians exploring (n = 8), acknowledging (n = 17), informing (n = 27), adapting (n = 27), and advocating (n = 18). Parents often increased their own advocacy on behalf of their child (n = 47). Parents also identified the need for parental engagement in finding solutions (n = 12). Finally, one parent suggested that clinicians should assume that communication will fail and develop contingency plans in advance.

CONCLUSION:

Communication breakdowns in pediatric oncology negatively affect parents and children. Clinicians should plan for communication breakdowns and respond by exploring, acknowledging, informing, adapting, advocating, and engaging parents in finding solutions.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aflicción / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: JCO Oncol Pract Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Macao

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aflicción / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: JCO Oncol Pract Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Macao