Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Operative vs. Nonoperative Treatment of Isolated Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Cannada, Lisa K; Nelson, Lauren; Tornetta, Paul; Hymes, Robert; Jones, Clifford B; Obremskey, William; Carroll, Eben; Mullis, Brian; Tucker, Michael; Teague, David; Marcantonio, Andrew; Ostrum, Robert; Core, Michael Del; Israel, Heidi.
Afiliación
  • Cannada LK; Hughston Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Nelson L; University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Tornetta P; Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Hymes R; Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia.
  • Jones CB; Dignity Health Medical Group, St. Joseph's Orthopaedic Surgery, Creighton Medical School, Phoenix Arizona.
  • Obremskey W; Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Carroll E; Wake Forest, Winston Salem, North Carolina.
  • Mullis B; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Tucker M; Palmett o Health, Columbia, South Carolina.
  • Teague D; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
  • Marcantonio A; Lahey Hospital, Burlington, Massachusetts.
  • Ostrum R; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Core MD; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
  • Israel H; Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 30(2): 67-72, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34181519
The purpose was to compare plate and screw fixation (open reduction internal fixation [ORIF]) and functional bracing (FB) of isolated humeral shaft fractures with treatment and patient-based outcomes. We performed a prospective trial of ORIF v. FB at 12 centers. Surgeons counseled patients on treatment options and a patient centered decision was made. We enrolled 179 patients, of which 6-month data was analyzed for 102 (39 female; 63 male). Forty-five were treated with ORIF and 57 with FB. We found no difference in the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, visual analogue score (VAS) or elbow range of motion (ROM) at 6 months. However, 11% of the FB group developed nonunion. Complications in the ORIF group included a 2% infection and nonunion rate and 13% iatrogenic radial nerve dysfunction (RND). ORIF can be expected to result in higher union rates with the inherent risks of infection and RND. Finally, at 6 months, both groups demonstrated higher DASH scores than population norms, indicating a lack of full recovery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(2):067-072, 2021).
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fijación Interna de Fracturas / Fracturas del Húmero Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Orthop Adv Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fijación Interna de Fracturas / Fracturas del Húmero Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Orthop Adv Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article