Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Influence of Severe Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia on Overall Survival in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Damen, Pim J J; Kroese, Tiuri E; van Hillegersberg, Richard; Schuit, Ewoud; Peters, Max; Verhoeff, Joost J C; Lin, Steven H; van Rossum, Peter S N.
Afiliación
  • Damen PJJ; Departments of Radiation Oncology.
  • Kroese TE; Departments of Radiation Oncology; Surgery.
  • van Hillegersberg R; Surgery.
  • Schuit E; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care; Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Peters M; Departments of Radiation Oncology.
  • Verhoeff JJC; Departments of Radiation Oncology. Electronic address: J.J.C.Verhoeff-10@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Lin SH; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • van Rossum PSN; Departments of Radiation Oncology.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 111(4): 936-948, 2021 11 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34329738
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Emerging evidence suggests a detrimental prognostic association between radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) and pathologic response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) in patients who undergo radiation therapy for cancer. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the prognostic impact of RIL on OS in patients with solid tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched. The analysis included intervention and prognostic studies that reported on the prognostic relationship between RIL and survival in patients with solid tumors. An overall pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for different patient-, tumor-, treatment-, and study-related characteristics were performed using meta-regression.

RESULTS:

Pooling of 21 cohorts within 20 eligible studies demonstrated a statistically significant association between OS and grade ≥3 versus grade 0-2 RIL (n = 16; pooled aHR, 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-1.90) and grade 4 RIL versus grade 0-3 (n = 5; aHR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.24-1.90). Moderate heterogeneity among aHRs was observed, mostly attributable to overestimated aHRs in 7 studies likely subject to model-overfitting. Subgroup analysis showed significant prognostic impact of grade ≥3 RIL in 4 brain tumor (aHR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.06-2.51), 4 lung cancer (aHR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.01-2.29), and 3 pancreatic cancer (aHR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10-3.36) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS:

This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant detrimental prognostic association between grade ≥3 lymphopenia and OS in patients receiving radiation therapy for solid tumors. This finding appears consistent for tumors of the brain, thorax, and upper abdomen and provides an imperative to further elucidate the potential survival benefit of lymphopenia-mitigating strategies.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Linfopenia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Linfopenia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article