Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Driving and Alzheimer's dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of the existing guidelines emphasizing on the neurologist's role.
Stamatelos, Petros; Economou, Alexandra; Stefanis, Leonidas; Yannis, George; Papageorgiou, Sokratis G.
Afiliación
  • Stamatelos P; 1st Department of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 72 Vas. Sofias Ave, 11528, Athens, Greece.
  • Economou A; Department of Psychology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Stefanis L; 1st Department of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 72 Vas. Sofias Ave, 11528, Athens, Greece.
  • Yannis G; School of Civil Engineering, Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Papageorgiou SG; 1st Department of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 72 Vas. Sofias Ave, 11528, Athens, Greece. sokpapa@med.uoa.gr.
Neurol Sci ; 42(12): 4953-4963, 2021 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581880
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Driving is a complex task requiring the integrity and the cooperation of cognition, motor, and somatosensory skills, all of which are impacted by neurological diseases.

OBJECTIVE:

Identification of neurologist's role when assessing fitness to drive of cognitively impaired individuals.

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review of the guidelines/recommendations (G/Rs) regarding the evaluation of driving fitness of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or dementia. Emphasis was put on the neurological and neuropsychological aspects of the evaluation.

RESULTS:

Eighteen G/Rs were included in the review (9 national guidelines, 5 recommendation papers, 3 consensus statements, and 1 position paper). All G/Rs referred to drivers with dementia and 9/18 referred to drivers with MCI. A common approach among G/Rs is the initial trichotomization of patients in safe to drive, unsafe to drive, and undetermined cases, which are referred to a second-line evaluator. First-line evaluators are general practitioners in 10/18 G/Rs; second-line evaluators are neurologists in 7/18 G/Rs. Specific neuropsychological tests are proposed in 11/18 G/Rs and relative cut-off values in 7/18. The most commonly used tests are the MMSE, TMT, and CDT. A thorough neurological examination is proposed in only 1/18 G/R.

CONCLUSION:

Although extensive multi-disciplinary research has provided useful information for driving behavior of cognitively impaired individuals, we are still far from a widely accepted approach of driving ability evaluation in this increasing population. A comprehensive assessment from a multi-disciplinary team in which the neurologist plays a critical role seems to be required, although this has not yet been implemented in any G/Rs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducción de Automóvil / Enfermedad de Alzheimer / Disfunción Cognitiva Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neurol Sci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducción de Automóvil / Enfermedad de Alzheimer / Disfunción Cognitiva Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neurol Sci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia