Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Response to Rucaparib in BRCA-Mutant Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Identified by Genomic Testing in the TRITON2 Study.
Loehr, Andrea; Patnaik, Akash; Campbell, David; Shapiro, Jeremy; Bryce, Alan H; McDermott, Ray; Sautois, Brieuc; Vogelzang, Nicholas J; Bambury, Richard M; Voog, Eric; Zhang, Jingsong; Piulats, Josep M; Hussain, Arif; Ryan, Charles J; Merseburger, Axel S; Daugaard, Gedske; Heidenreich, Axel; Fizazi, Karim; Higano, Celestia S; Krieger, Laurence E; Sternberg, Cora N; Watkins, Simon P; Despain, Darrin; Simmons, Andrew D; Dowson, Melanie; Golsorkhi, Tony; Chowdhury, Simon; Abida, Wassim.
Afiliación
  • Loehr A; Translational Medicine, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, Colorado.
  • Patnaik A; Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Campbell D; Medical Oncology, Barwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Shapiro J; Medical Oncology, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bryce AH; Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • McDermott R; Genitourinary Oncology, Adelaide and Meath Hospital (Incorporating the National Children's Hospital), Dublin, Ireland.
  • Sautois B; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium.
  • Vogelzang NJ; Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada.
  • Bambury RM; Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
  • Voog E; Medical Oncology, Clinique Victor Hugo Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France.
  • Zhang J; Genitourinary Oncology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
  • Piulats JM; Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Hussain A; Department of Medicine, Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Ryan CJ; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Merseburger AS; Department of Urology, Lübeck University Hospital, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Daugaard G; Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Heidenreich A; Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany.
  • Fizazi K; Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif Cedex, France.
  • Higano CS; Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
  • Krieger LE; Oncology, Genesis Care Integrative Cancer Centre, St Leonards, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Sternberg CN; Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian, New York, New York.
  • Watkins SP; Clinical Science, Clovis Oncology UK, Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Despain D; Biostatistics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, Colorado.
  • Simmons AD; Translational Medicine, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, Colorado.
  • Dowson M; Study Operations, Clovis Oncology UK, Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Golsorkhi T; Clinical Development, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, Colorado.
  • Chowdhury S; Medical Oncology, Guy's Hospital and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.
  • Abida W; Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. abidam@mskcc.org.
Clin Cancer Res ; 27(24): 6677-6686, 2021 12 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34598946
PURPOSE: The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the United States for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a deleterious germline and/or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alteration. While sequencing of tumor tissue is considered the standard for identifying patients with BRCA alterations (BRCA+), plasma profiling may provide a minimally invasive option to select patients for rucaparib treatment. Here, we report clinical efficacy in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC identified through central plasma, central tissue, or local genomic testing and enrolled in TRITON2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had progressed after next-generation androgen receptor-directed and taxane-based therapies for mCRPC and had BRCA alterations identified by central sequencing of plasma and/or tissue samples or local genomic testing. Concordance of plasma/tissue BRCA status and objective response rate and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were summarized. RESULTS: TRITON2 enrolled 115 patients with BRCA+ identified by central plasma (n = 34), central tissue (n = 37), or local (n = 44) testing. Plasma/tissue concordance was determined in 38 patients with paired samples and was 47% in 19 patients with a somatic BRCA alteration. No statistically significant differences were observed between objective and PSA response rates to rucaparib across the 3 assay groups. Patients unable to provide tissue samples and tested solely by plasma assay responded at rates no different from patients identified as BRCA+ by tissue testing. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma, tissue, and local testing of mCRPC patients can be used to identify men with BRCA+ mCRPC who can benefit from treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article