Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan, Jonathan M; Kikano, Elias G; Smith, Daniel A; Rao, Sanjay; Podury, Ruchika; Wang, Margaret; Durieux, Jared C; Paspulati, Raj M; Ponsky, Lee; Ramaiya, Nikhil H; Tirumani, Sree H.
Afiliación
  • Gan JM; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Kikano EG; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Smith DA; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Rao S; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Podury R; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Wang M; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Durieux JC; Center for Clinical Research, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
  • Paspulati RM; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Ponsky L; Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
  • Ramaiya NH; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Tirumani SH; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, B114, Cleveland, OH 44106.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 218(5): 859-866, 2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817189
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND. The frequency of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) following negative biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has not been well investigated in direct comparative studies. OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to compare the frequency of csPCa after negative prebiopsy bpMRI and mpMRI and to evaluate factors predictive of csPCa in the two cohorts. METHODS. This retrospective study included 232 men (mean age, 64.5 years) with negative bpMRI from August 2017 to March 2020 and 193 men (mean age, 69.0 years) with negative mpMRI from January 2018 to December 2018. PI-RADS category 1 or 2 was defined as negative. The study institution offered bpMRI as a low-cost self-pay option for patients without insurer coverage of prebiospy mpMRI. Patient characteristics and subsequent biopsy results were recorded. CsPCa was defined as Gleason score of 3 + 4 or greater. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of csPCa. The AUC of PSA density (PSAD) for csPCA was computed, and the diagnostic performance of PSAD was assessed at a clinically established threshold of 0.15 ng/mL2. RESULTS. Systematic biopsy was performed after negative bpMRI for 41.4% (96/232) of patients and after negative mpMRI for 30.5% (59/193) (p = .02). Among those undergoing biopsy, csPCa was present in 15.6% (15/96) in the bpMRI cohort versus 13.6% (8/59) in the mpMRI cohort (p = .69). The NPV for csPCa was 84% (81/96) for bpMRI and 86% (51/59) for mpMRI. In multivariable analyses, independent predictors of csPCa included smaller prostate volume (OR, 0.27; p < .001) and greater PSAD (OR, 3.09; p < .001). In multivariable models, bpMRI (compared with mpMRI) was not independently predictive of csPCa (p > .05). PSAD had an AUC for csPCa of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.56-0.87) in the bpMRI cohort versus 0.68 (95% CI, 0.42-0.93) in the mpMRI cohort. For detecting csPCa, a PSAD threshold of 0.15 ng/mL2 had NPV of 90% and PPV of 28%, in the bpMRI cohort versus NPV of 92% and PPV of 44% in the mpMRI cohort. CONCLUSION. The frequencies of csPCa were not significantly different at systematic biopsy performed after negative bpMRI and mpMRI examinations. PSAD had similar diagnostic utility for csPCa in the two cohorts. CLINICAL IMPACT. Either bpMRI or mpMRI, in combination with PSAD measurement, can help avoid negative prostate biopsies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article