Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning model for classification of predominantly allergic and non-allergic asthma among preschool children with asthma hospitalization.
Bhardwaj, Piyush; Tyagi, Ashish; Tyagi, Shashank; Antão, Joana; Deng, Qichen.
Afiliación
  • Bhardwaj P; Centre for Advanced Computational Solutions (C-fACS), Department of Molecular Biosciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Tyagi A; Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, SHKM Govt. Medical College, Nuh, Haryana, India.
  • Tyagi S; Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Lady Hardinge Medical College & Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
  • Antão J; Lab3R-Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Deng Q; Department of Research and Education, CIRO, Horn, The Netherlands.
J Asthma ; 60(3): 487-495, 2023 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35344453
OBJECTIVE: Asthma is the most frequent chronic airway illness in preschool children and is difficult to diagnose due to the disease's heterogeneity. This study aimed to investigate different machine learning models and suggested the most effective one to classify two forms of asthma in preschool children (predominantly allergic asthma and non-allergic asthma) using a minimum number of features. METHODS: After pre-processing, 127 patients (70 with non-allergic asthma and 57 with predominantly allergic asthma) were chosen for final analysis from the Frankfurt dataset, which had asthma-related information on 205 patients. The Random Forest algorithm and Chi-square were used to select the key features from a total of 63 features. Six machine learning models: random forest, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machines, adaptive boosting, extra tree classifier, and logistic regression were then trained and tested using 10-fold stratified cross-validation. RESULTS: Among all features, age, weight, C-reactive protein, eosinophilic granulocytes, oxygen saturation, pre-medication inhaled corticosteroid + long-acting beta2-agonist (PM-ICS + LABA), PM-other (other pre-medication), H-Pulmicort/celestamine (Pulmicort/celestamine during hospitalization), and H-azithromycin (azithromycin during hospitalization) were found to be highly important. The support vector machine approach with a linear kernel was able to diffrentiate between predominantly allergic asthma and non-allergic asthma with higher accuracy (77.8%), precision (0.81), with a true positive rate of 0.73 and a true negative rate of 0.81, a F1 score of 0.81, and a ROC-AUC score of 0.79. Logistic regression was found to be the second-best classifier with an overall accuracy of 76.2%. CONCLUSION: Predominantly allergic and non-allergic asthma can be classified using machine learning approaches based on nine features.Supplemental data for this article is available online at at www.tandfonline.com/ijas .
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda