Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automatically Diagnosing Skull Fractures Using an Object Detection Method and Deep Learning Algorithm in Plain Radiography Images.
Jeong, Tae Seok; Yee, Gi Taek; Kim, Kwang Gi; Kim, Young Jae; Lee, Sang Gu; Kim, Woo Kyung.
Afiliación
  • Jeong TS; Department of Traumatology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Yee GT; Department of Neurosurgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Kim KG; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Kim YJ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Lee SG; Department of Neurosurgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Kim WK; Department of Traumatology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc ; 66(1): 53-62, 2023 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35650677
OBJECTIVE: Deep learning is a machine learning approach based on artificial neural network training, and object detection algorithm using deep learning is used as the most powerful tool in image analysis. We analyzed and evaluated the diagnostic performance of a deep learning algorithm to identify skull fractures in plain radiographic images and investigated its clinical applicability. METHODS: A total of 2026 plain radiographic images of the skull (fracture, 991; normal, 1035) were obtained from 741 patients. The RetinaNet architecture was used as a deep learning model. Precision, recall, and average precision were measured to evaluate the deep learning algorithm's diagnostic performance. RESULTS: In ResNet-152, the average precision for intersection over union (IOU) 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, were 0.7240, 0.6698, and 0.3687, respectively. When the intersection over union (IOU) and confidence threshold were 0.1, the precision was 0.7292, and the recall was 0.7650. When the IOU threshold was 0.1, and the confidence threshold was 0.6, the true and false rates were 82.9% and 17.1%, respectively. There were significant differences in the true/false and false-positive/false-negative ratios between the anteriorposterior, towne, and both lateral views (p=0.032 and p=0.003). Objects detected in false positives had vascular grooves and suture lines. In false negatives, the detection performance of the diastatic fractures, fractures crossing the suture line, and fractures around the vascular grooves and orbit was poor. CONCLUSION: The object detection algorithm applied with deep learning is expected to be a valuable tool in diagnosing skull fractures.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Korean Neurosurg Soc Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Korean Neurosurg Soc Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article