Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Remdesivir for the treatment of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 receiving supplemental oxygen: a targeted literature review and meta-analysis.
Beckerman, Rachel; Gori, Andrea; Jeyakumar, Sushanth; Malin, Jakob J; Paredes, Roger; Póvoa, Pedro; Smith, Nathaniel J; Teixeira-Pinto, Armando.
Afiliación
  • Beckerman R; Maple Health Group, New York, NY, USA. rachel.beckerman@maplehealthgroup.com.
  • Gori A; Infectious Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Centre for Multidisciplinary Research in Health Science (MACH), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Jeyakumar S; Maple Health Group, New York, NY, USA.
  • Malin JJ; Department I of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Paredes R; Infectious Diseases Department & irsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalonia, Spain.
  • Póvoa P; Center for Global Health and Diseases, Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Smith NJ; Nova Medical School, CHRC, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Teixeira-Pinto A; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Research Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, OUH Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 9622, 2022 06 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35688854
This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen. Randomized controlled trials of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, where patients were receiving supplemental oxygen at baseline and at least one arm received treatment with remdesivir, were identified. Outcomes included mortality, recovery, and no longer requiring supplemental oxygen. NMAs were performed for low-flow oxygen (LFO2); high-flow oxygen (HFO2), including NIV (non-invasive ventilation); or oxygen at any flow (AnyO2) at early (day 14/15) and late (day 28/29) time points. Six studies were included (N = 5245 patients) in the NMA. Remdesivir lowered early and late mortality among AnyO2 patients (risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.34-0.79; RR 0.81, 95%CrI 0.69-0.95) and LFO2 patients (RR 0.21, 95%CrI 0.09-0.46; RR 0.24, 95%CrI 0.11-0.48); no improvement was observed among HFO2 patients. Improved early and late recovery was observed among LFO2 patients (RR 1.22, 95%CrI 1.09-1.38; RR 1.17, 95%CrI 1.09-1.28). Remdesivir also lowered the requirement for oxygen support among all patient subgroups. Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen at baseline, use of remdesivir compared to best supportive care is likely to improve the risk of mortality, recovery and need for oxygen support in AnyO2 and LFO2 patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos