Tislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE 302): impact on health-related quality of life.
ESMO Open
; 7(4): 100517, 2022 08.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35785595
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
RATIONALE 302 (NCT03430843) an open-label, phase III study of second-line treatment of advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), reported that tislelizumab, relative to investigator-chosen chemotherapy (ICC), was associated with improvements in overall survival and a favorable safety profile. This study assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and ESCC-related symptoms of patients in RATIONALE 302.METHODS:
Adults with advanced/metastatic ESCC whose disease progressed following prior systemic therapy were randomized 1 1 to receive either tislelizumab or ICC (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). HRQoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Oesophageal Cancer Module 18 items (QLQ-OES18), and the EuroQoL Five-Dimensions Five-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) visual analogue scale. Mixed effect modeling for repeated measurements examined changes from baseline to weeks 12 and 18. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine time to deterioration.RESULTS:
Overall, 512 patients were randomized to tislelizumab (n = 256) or ICC (n = 256). The tislelizumab arm maintained QLQ-C30 global health status/quality whereas the ICC arm worsened at week 12 {difference in least square (LS) mean change 5.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-9.5], P = 0.0028} and week 18 [difference in LS mean change 8.1 (95% CI 3.4-12.8), P = 0.0008]. Physical functioning (week 18) and fatigue (weeks 12 and 18) worsened less in the tislelizumab compared with the ICC arm. The tislelizumab arm improved in reflux symptoms, whereas the ICC worsened at week 12 [difference in LS mean change -4.1 (95% CI -7.6 to -0.6), P = 0.0229]. The visual analogue scale remained consistent in the tislelizumab arm whereas it worsened in the ICC arm. The hazard of time to deterioration was lower in tislelizumab patients compared with ICC for physical functioning and reflux.CONCLUSIONS:
HRQoL, including fatigue symptoms and physical functioning, was maintained in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC receiving tislelizumab compared with ICC-treated patients. These results provide additional support for the benefits of tislelizumab in this patient population.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Neoplasias Esofágicas
/
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
Límite:
Adult
/
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
ESMO Open
Año:
2022
Tipo del documento:
Article