Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study.
Hayashi, Tatsuya; Yano, Shimpei; Shibukawa, Shuhei; Kojima, Shinya; Ito, Toshimune; Oba, Hiroshi; Kondo, Hiroshi; Yamamoto, Asako; Okamoto, Takahide.
Afiliación
  • Hayashi T; Graduate School of Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yano S; Central of Radiology, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Shibukawa S; Department of Radiological Technology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kojima S; Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ito T; Graduate School of Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Oba H; Graduate School of Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kondo H; Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yamamoto A; Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Okamoto T; Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 12(11): 5263-5270, 2022 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36330194
ABSTRACT
Arm positions employed during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can affect magnetic field distribution, which may result in variability in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements. This study evaluated the effect of arm position on lumbar PDFF measured using chemical-shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI). Fifteen healthy volunteers from a single-center underwent lumbar CSE-MRI at two different arm positions (side and elevated) using a single 3T scanner. Scans were performed twice in each position. PDFFs of the L1-L5 vertebrae were independently measured by two readers, and reader measurements were compared by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). We compared PDFF measurements from two arm positions and from two consecutive scans using the Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman analysis. Measurements from the two readers were in high agreement [ICC =0.999; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.998-0.999]. No significant difference was observed between PDFFs from the first and second scans of all vertebrae for each reader (all P>0.05); however, PDFF for the elevated arm position was significantly higher than that for the side arm position (37.9-44.8% vs. 37.0-43.8%; all P<0.05), except at the L2 level by reader 2. The mean differences in PDFF measurements from the first and second scans [0.1%; 95% limits of agreement (LoA), -1.8% to 1.9%] and from the side arm and elevated arm positions (0.8%; 95% LoA, -1.6% to 3.2%) were small. In conclusion, these preliminary data suggest that different arm positions during CSE-MRI can slightly affect lumbar PDFF; however, the mean absolute differences were very small.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Quant Imaging Med Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Quant Imaging Med Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón