Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The predictive value of electrocardiographic polarization parameters on appropriate ICD shock in primary prevention heart failure patients.
Ozgul, Ufuk; Turan, Oguzhan Ekrem; Baskurt, Ahmet Anil; Yilancioglu, Resit Yigit; Dogdus, Mustafa; Inevi, Umut Dursun; Ozcan, Emin Evren.
Afiliación
  • Ozgul U; Aydin Ataturk State Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Aydin, Turkey. Electronic address: uozgul35@gmail.com.
  • Turan OE; Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Management Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Baskurt AA; Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Yilancioglu RY; Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Management Center, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Dogdus M; Usak University, Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Usak, Turkey.
  • Inevi UD; Ege Aritmi Medical Products Engineering, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Ozcan EE; Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Management Center, Izmir, Turkey.
J Electrocardiol ; 77: 80-84, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36347655
ABSTRACT
OBJECT The effect of frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio on cardiac events have been shown in many studies. In this study, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle, TPe and Tp-e/QT ratio on ICD shock in patients who had ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) implanted due to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). MATERIAL AND

METHOD:

158 patients with HFrEF who had previous ICD implantation were retrospectively analyzed. 27 patients were found to have an appropriate shock. Frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio were calculated by evaluating the basal ECG records of the patients. Comparisons of these arrhythmogenic predictors were made in patients with and without ICD shock at follow-up.

RESULT:

When 158 patients with previous ICD implantation were analyzed in two groups with and without ICD shock, the number of patients with frontal QRS-T angle >120°, Tp-e interval > 105 ms, Tp-e/QT > 0.2 in the shock group (n 27) was found to be high with a different significance (p<0.01, p<0.01, p<0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding other ECG parameters such as QRS duration, QT interval, PR interval, fragmented QRS and positive T wave. In addition, more amiodarone use was observed in the shock group, and more hyperlipidemia cases were observed in the non-shocked group (p0.01; p<0.01).

CONCLUSION:

Increased frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QT ratio are arrhythmogenic parameters and predict appropriate ICD shock.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desfibriladores Implantables / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Electrocardiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desfibriladores Implantables / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Electrocardiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article