Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic compatibility of various fixed orthodontic retainers for head/neck MRI and dental MRI.
Juerchott, Alexander; Roser, Christoph J; Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah; Nittka, Mathias; Lux, Christopher J; Heiland, Sabine; Bendszus, Martin; Hilgenfeld, Tim.
Afiliación
  • Juerchott A; Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. alexander.juerchott@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
  • Roser CJ; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Saleem MA; Division of Experimental Radiology, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Nittka M; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Lux CJ; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Heiland S; Division of Experimental Radiology, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Bendszus M; Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Hilgenfeld T; Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(5): 2375-2384, 2023 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36640179
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the diagnostic MRI compatibility of different fixed orthodontic retainers using a high-resolution 3D-sequence optimized for artifact reduction. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Maxillary and mandibular retainers made of five different materials were scanned in vitro and in vivo at 3 T MRI using an MSVAT-SPACE sequence. In vitro, artifact volumes were determined for all maxillary and mandibular retainers (AVmax; AVmand). In vivo, two independent observers quantified the extent of artifacts based on the visibility of 124 dental and non-dental landmarks using a five-point rating scale (1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = acceptable, 4 = poor, 5 = not visible).

RESULTS:

Rectangular-steel retainers caused the largest artifacts (AVmax/AVmand 18,060/15,879 mm3) and considerable diagnostic impairment in vivo (mean landmark visibility score ± SD inside/outside the retainer areas 4.8 ± 0.8/2.9 ± 1.6). Smaller, but diagnostically relevant artifacts were observed for twistflex steel retainers (437/6317 mm3, 3.1 ± 1.7/1.3 ± 0.7). All retainers made of precious-alloy materials produced only very small artifact volumes (titanium grade 1 70/46 mm3, titanium grade 5 47/35 mm3, gold 23/21 mm3) without any impact on image quality in vivo (each retainer visibility scores of 1.0 ± 0.0 for all landmarks inside and outside the retainer areas).

CONCLUSIONS:

In contrast to steel retainers, titanium and gold retainers are fully compatible for both head/neck and dental MRI when using MSVAT-SPACE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study demonstrates that titanium and gold retainers do not impair the diagnostic quality of head/neck and dental MRI when applying an appropriate artifact-reduction technique. Steel retainers, however, are not suitable for dental MRI and can severely impair image quality in head/neck MRI of the oral cavity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Titanio / Retenedores Ortodóncicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Titanio / Retenedores Ortodóncicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania