Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Practical Guide to Relugolix: Early Experience With Oral Androgen Deprivation Therapy.
Kasparian, Saro; Wei, Oren; Tsai, Ni-Chun; Palmer, Joycelynne; Pal, Sumanta; Lyou, Yung; Dorff, Tanya.
Afiliación
  • Kasparian S; Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Wei O; Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Tsai NC; Department of Biostats, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Palmer J; Department of Biostats, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Pal S; Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Lyou Y; Department of Oncology, Providence St Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, CA, USA.
  • Dorff T; Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Oncologist ; 28(8): 699-705, 2023 08 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36888587
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Relugolix is the newest form of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) approved for prostate cancer. However, as an oral drug, several real-world concerns exist, particularly medication compliance, safety with other androgen receptor-targeted agents, and financial burden to patients.

METHODS:

A single institution retrospective chart review was conducted evaluating all patients who were prescribed relugolix for any prostate cancer indication from January 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022. Demographic data, cardiac risk factors, concomitant therapy usage, and PSA/testosterone levels, were abstracted from the chart review. Adverse effects were obtained by examining progress notes. Compliance was assessed by clinic notes as well as prescription fills by specialty pharmacy records. The reasons patients did not fill or discontinued the medication were noted.

RESULTS:

Hundred and one patients were prescribed relugolix, and 91 patients consented to research. Seventy-one (78%) patients filled the prescription to relugolix, with a median follow-up of 5 months. Prescription fill data were available for 45 (63%) patients, with 94% of days covered. The most commonly reported reason not to fill was cost at 50%. Sixty-six (93%) patients reported never missing a dose. PSA levels were available in 71 (100%) patients with 69 (97%) showing stable or improved PSA. Testosterone levels were available in 61 (86%) of patients, which showed 61 (100%) stable or successful castration. Twenty-four (34%) patients used relugolix in combination. No new major safety signals were seen in combination therapy. Nineteen (27%) patients had switched to another form of ADT. Fifteen of these (79%) felt similar or better on relugolix therapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compliance with relugolix seemed acceptable. No major new safety signals were seen, even in combination. Among patients who switched therapy, most tolerated relugolix similarly or better than the previous form of ADT. The cost was a major reason for patients not initiating and for discontinuing therapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos