Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study.
Song, Seung Ho; Park, Jun Seok; Choi, Gyu-Seog; Park, Soo Yeon; Kim, Hye Jin; Lee, Sung-Min; Na, Dong-Hee; Jeong, Min Hye.
Afiliación
  • Song SH; Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  • Park JS; Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  • Choi GS; Kyungpook National University Bio-Medical Research Institute, Daegu, Korea.
  • Park SY; Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  • Kim HJ; Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  • Lee SM; Kyungpook National University Bio-Medical Research Institute, Daegu, Korea.
  • Na DH; Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  • Jeong MH; Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res ; 104(4): 214-221, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37051157
Purpose: Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision. Methods: We reviewed our database for patients with rectal cancers who had undergone curative surgery between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were grouped according to whether or not an ALT was performed. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare outcomes for groups in a 1:1 case-matched cohort. Results: In total, 1,191 patients underwent rectal excision; 438 (219 in each group) formed the case-matched cohort for analysis. The protective stoma rate was 16.0% and 14.6% in the ALT and the no-ALT groups, respectively (P = 0.791). In the ALT group, 2 patients (0.9%) showed a positive result and were treated with rectal tube drainage, resulting in no leakage. There was no significant difference in postoperative AL rate between the groups (ALT group: 4.6% vs. no-ALT group: 4.1%, P > 0.999). Conclusion: ALT played a minimal role in detecting AL following rectal excision. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and clarify whether AL can be prevented with ALT or alternative methods.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Treat Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Treat Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article