Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health Research Collaborations by Academic Entities: A Systematic Review.
Sbaity, Eman; Zahwe, Mariam; Helou, Vanessa; Bahsoun, Reem; Hassan, Zeina; Abi Khalil, Pamela; Akl, Elie A.
Afiliación
  • Sbaity E; E. Sbaity is assistant professor, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Zahwe M; M. Zahwe is postdoctoral research associate, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Helou V; V. Helou is a medical student, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; ORCID: 0000-0003-4826-1659 .
  • Bahsoun R; R. Bahsoun is a medical student, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Hassan Z; Z. Hassan is research assistant, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Abi Khalil P; P. Abi Khalil is senior research assistant, Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Akl EA; E.A. Akl is professor, Department of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, and professor, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: 0000-0002-3444-8618 .
Acad Med ; 98(10): 1220-1227, 2023 10 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37232854
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To review the literature on health research collaborations by academic entities and to identify the main phases, components, and concepts of these research collaborations.

METHOD:

The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching 4 databases in March 2022 for studies on health research collaboration between an academic entity (individual, group, or institution) and any other entity included. They excluded non-health-related studies and studies in which collaboration was not for the purpose of research. From included studies, reviewers abstracted data about the 4 main phases of research collaborations (initiation, conduct, monitoring, and evaluation) and synthesized their corresponding components and concepts using thematic analysis method.

RESULTS:

A total of 59 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies described building research collaborations between an academic entity and other academic entities (n = 29; 49%), communities (n = 28; 47%), industry (n = 7; 12%), and/or governmental entities (n = 4; 7%). Of the 59 studies, 22 addressed 2 phases of collaboration, 20 addressed 3 phases, and 17 addressed all 4 phases. All included studies described at least 1 of the components relevant to the initiation phase and at least 1 relevant to the conduct phase. Team structure was the most common component discussed in relation to the initiation phase (n = 48; 81%), and team dynamics was the most common component discussed in relation to the conduct phase (n = 55; 93%). At least 1 of the components relevant to the monitoring phase was reported in 36 studies, and at least 1 component relevant to the evaluation phase was reported in 28 studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

This review provides important information for groups aiming to engage in collaborative research. The synthesized list of collaboration phases and their components can serve as a road map for collaborators at different steps of their research.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Organizaciones / Gobierno Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acad Med Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Líbano

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Organizaciones / Gobierno Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acad Med Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Líbano