Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Soares Ferreira Junior, Alexandre; Pinheiro Maux Lessa, Morgana; Kaplan, Samantha; Coles, Theresa M; Terrell, Deirdra R; Onwuemene, Oluwatoyosi A.
Afiliación
  • Soares Ferreira Junior A; Department of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto 15090-000, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Pinheiro Maux Lessa M; Department of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto 15090-000, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Kaplan S; Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Coles TM; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Terrell DR; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
  • Onwuemene OA; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Clin Med ; 12(15)2023 Aug 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37568558
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impacts of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) have been captured in clinical studies using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) that are validated for other diseases. However, the validity evidence to support the use of existing PROMs in patients with TTP is unknown. In a systematic review of the literature, including studies of adults and children with TTP, we assessed the validity evidence for use of PROMs in clinical research and clinical practice, characterized HRQoL, described the integration of PROMs in clinical practice and evaluated PRO scores for patients with TTP compared with reference populations. From an initial 4518 studies, we identified 14 studies using 16 PROMs to assess general HRQoL domains in patients in remission. No identified studies assessed the validity of PROMs for the context of use of TTP and no studies described PROM integration into TTP clinical practice or evaluated PROMs that were specific for patients with TTP. Moreover, PRO scores were worse in patients with TTP compared with reference populations and other chronic conditions. We conclude that, in patients with TTP, PROMs pick up on important patient experiences not captured by clinical outcomes at present. There is, therefore, a need for studies that assess the validity of existing PROMs in patients with TTP to determine if TTP-specific PROMs specific to patients with TTP should be developed.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil