Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study.
Takayama, Wataru; Endo, Akira; Morishita, Koji; Otomo, Yasuhiro.
Afiliación
  • Takayama W; Trauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0034, Japan.
  • Endo A; Department of Acute Critical Care and Disaster Medicine, Graduate School of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0034, Japan.
  • Morishita K; Department of Acute Critical Care and Disaster Medicine, Graduate School of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0034, Japan.
  • Otomo Y; Department of Acute Critical Care Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, 4-1-1 Otsuno, Tsuchiura 300-0028, Ibaraki, Japan.
J Pers Med ; 13(8)2023 Jul 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37623453
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effectiveness of automated chest compression devices depending on the time of admission based on the frequency of iatrogenic chest injuries, the duration of in-hospital resuscitation efforts, and clinical outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective historical control study of OHCA patients in Japan between 2015-2022. The patients were divided according to time of admission, where day-time was considered 07:00-22:59 and night-time 23:00-06:59. These patients were then divided into two categories based on the in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (IHCPR) device: manual chest compression (mCC) group and automatic chest compression devices (ACCD) group. We used univariate and multivariate ordered logistic regression models adjusted for pre-hospital confounders to evaluate the impact of ACCD use during IHCPR on outcomes (IHCPR duration, CPR-related chest injuries, and clinical outcomes) in the day-time and night-time groups. RESULTS: Among 1101 patients with OHCA (day-time, 809; night-time, 292), including 215 patients who underwent ACCD during IHCPR in day-time (26.6%) and 104 patients in night-time group (35.6%), the multivariate model showed a significant association of ACCD use with the outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation and higher rates of return in spontaneous circulation, lower incidence of CPR-related chest injuries, longer in-hospital resuscitation durations, greater survival to Emergency Department and hospital discharge, and greater survival with good neurological outcome to hospital discharge, though only in the night-time group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent ACCD during in-hospital resuscitation at night had a significantly longer duration of in-hospital resuscitation, a lower incidence of CPR-related chest injuries, and better outcomes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pers Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pers Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón