Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Urinary peptide analysis to predict the response to blood pressure medication.
Jaimes Campos, Mayra Alejandra; Mavrogeorgis, Emmanouil; Latosinska, Agnieszka; Eder, Susanne; Buchwinkler, Lukas; Mischak, Harald; Siwy, Justyna; Rossing, Peter; Mayer, Gert; Jankowski, Joachim.
Afiliación
  • Jaimes Campos MA; Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
  • Mavrogeorgis E; University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Institute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research, Aachen, Germany.
  • Latosinska A; Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
  • Eder S; University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Institute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research, Aachen, Germany.
  • Buchwinkler L; Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
  • Mischak H; Department of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Siwy J; Department of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Rossing P; Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
  • Mayer G; Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
  • Jankowski J; Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37930730
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

HYPOTHESIS:

The risk of Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) progression is significant despite renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blocking agents treatment. Current clinical tools cannot predict whether or not patients will respond to the treatment with RAS-inhibitors (RASi). We aimed to investigate if proteome analysis could identify urinary peptides as biomarkers that could predict the response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) treatment to avoid DKD progression. Furthermore, we investigated the comparability of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated using four different GFR-equations, for DKD progression.

METHODS:

We evaluated urine samples from a discovery cohort of 199 diabetic patients treated with RASi. DKD progression was defined based on eGFR percentage slope results between visits (∼1 year) and for the entire period (∼3 year) based on the eGFR values of each GFR-equation. Urine samples were analysed using capillary electrophoresis coupled mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis was performed between the uncontrolled (patients who did not respond to RASi treatment) and controlled kidney function groups (patients who responded to the RASi treatment). Peptides were combined in a support vector machine-based model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the risk prediction models in two independent validation cohorts treated with RASi.

RESULTS:

The classification of patients into uncontrolled and controlled kidney function varies depending on the GFR-equation used, despite the same sample set. We identified 227 peptides showing nominal significant difference and consistent fold changes between uncontrolled and controlled patients in at least three methods of eGFR calculation. These included fragments of collagens, alpha-1-antitrypsin, antithrombin-III, CD99 antigen, and uromodulin. A model based on 189 of 227 peptides (DKDp189) showed a significant prediction of non-response to the treatment/DKD progression in two independent cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS:

The DKDp189 model demonstrates potential as a predictive tool for guiding treatment with RASi in diabetic patients.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nephrol Dial Transplant Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nephrol Dial Transplant Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania