Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neutrophil Reactivity Intensity and misclassification of immature granulocytes.
Wiwe, Elias Frost; Kofoed, Isabella Katarina; Dufréchou, Muriel Julie Falk; Philipsen, Jens Peter; Lemvig, Birthe; Rasmussen, Katrine Laura; Smith, Julie; Hillig, Thore.
Afiliación
  • Wiwe EF; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Kofoed IK; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Dufréchou MJF; Department of Technology, Faculty of Health and Technology, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Philipsen JP; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lemvig B; Department of Technology, Faculty of Health and Technology, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Rasmussen KL; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Smith J; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hillig T; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 46(2): 312-321, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37985128
INTRODUCTION: Immature granulocyte percentage (IG%) is an important biomarker for infection control. We observed spurious cases where the IG% was dramatically underestimated on the automated Sysmex XN-series hehmatology analyzer compared with manual differential. These cases were associated with high values of "Neutrophil Reactivity Intensity" (NEUT-RI), which should reflect the metabolic activity of the neutrophils. METHODS: We conducted a three-stage study to evaluate whether NEUT-RI could be utilized to screen for misclassified IG% results defined as the manual differential estimating a 10 percentage points higher IG% compared with the automated Sysmex differential. First, 124 patient samples were selected for 800-cell manual smear analysis based on their NEUT-RI values and compared with the automatic Sysmex IG% results. Next, 11 098 routine 110-cell manual smear analyses were compared with the corresponding Sysmex IG% results. Finally, during a 19-day period 160 additional patient samples underwent smear based on NEUT-RI values ≥56 fluorescence intensity (FI) to screen for misclassified results beyond our current smear practice. RESULTS: NEUT-RI ≥56 predicted IG% misclassification with 91% sensitivity and 88% specificity, but primarily when the internal Sysmex flag "Abnormal WBC Scattergram" was present. 90.1% of misclassified results were identified by this flag. Beyond our existing smear rules including this flag, NEUT-RI ≥56 FI had a positive predictive value below 1%. CONCLUSION: Both NEUT-RI and the internal Sysmex flag "Abnormal WBC Scattergram" work well to identify cases of IG% misclassification. However, in our setting NEUT-RI ≥56 FI had no meaningful additional predictive capacity to identify misclassifications beyond our current smear rules.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Granulocitos / Neutrófilos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Lab Hematol Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Granulocitos / Neutrófilos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Lab Hematol Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca