Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Yamauchi, Motoo; Satoh, Makoto; Kitahara, Tadashi; Ota, Ichiro; Strohl, Kingman.
Afiliación
  • Yamauchi M; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
  • Satoh M; University of Tsukuba, International Institute for Integrative Sleep Medicine, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Kitahara T; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
  • Ota I; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
  • Strohl K; Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Sleep Biol Rhythms ; 18: 77-87, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38031560
Purpose: This review will trace the elements of neurostimulation for obstructive sleep apnea and details on its implementation, efficacy and safety, immediate clinical outcomes, and future prospects. Methods: The literature on upper airway neurostimulation was surveyed from July, 2013, to July 2019, with a focus on the components of devices, evidence for clinical utility, and adverse events. Results: Current technology is focused on the hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS). The most long-term experience is with the Inspire Medical System (Maple Grove, MN USA) which has both FDA and European regulatory approval. Given the inclusion criteria (BMI <35, ideally <32), AHI 15-65/h, and a favorable anterior-posterior velopharyngeal collapse pattern on DISE), across many centers ~65% of patients who are intolerant to primary therapy achieve clinical success (AHI <20/h with a reduction of <50% in AHI), and more have symptomatic relief. Adverse events are generally mild, often self-limited, with occasional need for uncomplicated surgical adjustments or replacement of the implantable generator. Three other devices are in various phases of development, each with a differences in nerve electrodes, implantable components, power sources, proprietary programming, and activation patterns. Conclusions: HNS is not considered a first-line treatment option. HNS therapy, however, should be considered as one alternative therapeutic option for patients meeting the inclusion criteria when more traditional therapeutic options have been considered.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sleep Biol Rhythms Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sleep Biol Rhythms Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón