Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of oral aprepitant and intravenous fosaprepitant for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric oncology patients: a randomized phase III trial.
Yu, Li-Ting; Wang, Zhuo; Han, Ya-Li; Zhou, Fen; Wagner, Lars M; Zhang, Shun-Guo; Li, Zhi-Ling; Gao, Yi-Jin.
Afiliación
  • Yu LT; Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang Z; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Han YL; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhou F; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wagner LM; Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Zhang SG; Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Li ZL; Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Gao YJ; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Transl Pediatr ; 13(1): 110-118, 2024 Jan 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323173
ABSTRACT

Background:

Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists have improved the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), but to date there has been no prospective comparison between oral aprepitant and intravenous fosaprepitant in pediatric oncology patients.

Methods:

Our study was a double-parallel study, and the distribution ratio was 11. Children aged 2-12 years who were undergoing moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC or HEC) were randomly assigned to receive ondansetron and dexamethasone combined with either a single dose of intravenous fosaprepitant (arm A), or 3 days of oral aprepitant (arm B). The primary outcome measure was the rate of complete response (CR) of CINV within the acute phase, defined as from the start through 24 hours after the last chemotherapy dose. Response during the delayed phase, overall response, and use of rescue antiemetics were also assessed.

Results:

We prospectively evaluated 108 eligible patients, including 55 receiving fosaprepitant. Study observations were made during a single cycle for each patient. The occurrence of CR in the acute phase was statistically higher for patients receiving fosaprepitant (95% vs. 79%, P=0.018<0.05). Modest differences were seen in CR rates during the delayed phase (71% vs. 66%, P=0.586), and overall response rate (69% vs. 57%, P=0.179). The use of antiemetic rescue medicines was similar between arms A (11%) and B (7%).

Conclusions:

Fosaprepitant produced more CRs of CINV in the acute phase than did aprepitant, although there were no statistical differences in delayed phase response, overall response, or use of rescue antiemetics. This study confirms the safety, efficacy, and potential advantages of fosaprepitant in reducing CINV in pediatric oncology patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04873284.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Transl Pediatr Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Transl Pediatr Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China